‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane, government dupes crazy and hostile

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Nov 25, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Still waiting for Jojo to answer the two simple questions posed.

    Toss up all the word salads and off topic posts you like, it's still just obvious you are avoiding the facts with your false assertions.

    View attachment 23994
    Not getting any younger here, son.
     
  2. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,698
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
  3. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Bumped for Jojo in the hopes of his not derailing the thread any farther.

    The question is in your court.
     
  4. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,698
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    BUMP BECAUSE LIAR BOY TROLLS POST IS OUT OF CONTEXT

    MY RESPONSE


    I keep telling you
    [Perilica] that I have no intention to respond to your strawman until you address the original issue.

    the first thing you need to do is make sure you address the issue at hand that koko HAS NEVER MOVED ANY GOAL POST, YOU HAVE. A strawman is a question you made up to move the goal posts. This is not real difficult. Then again....

    Dont anyone answer his strawman question till he responds to the issues please.

    Perilica has now dodged

    "Explaining how all load bearing columns suffered global symmetrical failure within milliseconds of each other from random office fires across a 200 x 200 ft building.
    "

    in 19 subsequent posts.

    NOTHING you have said gets us any closer to your answering or explaining how this magical global symmetrical failure occurred in 3 WTC buildings. Hint the hat has very little to do with it.


    19 posts and counting

    [​IMG]

    not getting any younger here son


    LIAR BOY TROLL DISRUPTED AND DERAILED THIS THREAD AND PLAYED EVERY SCUM BAG TRICK IN THE BOOK TO DECEIVE THE READERS AND SHOULD BE BANNED FROM POSTING IN THIS THREAD.
     
  5. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Temper, temper Jojo.

    So much simpler to just either answer the questions or admit you haven't a clue. Railing on and constantly trying to make the thread about me does nothing to advance the conversation.
     
  6. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Quite simply, all you have to do is acknowledge that you understand and agree with those two details. Then the conversation can move forward.

    Let the math begin!

    * Per the thread title: Who is acting 'crazy and hostile' here?
     
  7. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,698
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83


    [​IMG]
     
  8. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,698
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    more dodging MY issue

    [​IMG]
     
  9. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why do you do that to yourself?

    Do I need to post the questions for you again, or are you ready to step up be mature?
     
  10. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,698
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I already posted them thanks anywy TROLL

    I keep telling you [Perilica] that I have no intention to respond to your strawman until you address the original issue.

    the first thing you need to do is make sure you address the issue at hand that koko HAS NEVER MOVED ANY GOAL POST, YOU HAVE. A strawman is a question you made up to move the goal posts. This is not real difficult. Then again....

    Dont anyone answer his strawman question till he responds to the issues please.

    Perilica has now dodged

    "Explaining how all load bearing columns suffered global symmetrical failure within milliseconds of each other from random office fires across a 200 x 200 ft building.
    "

    in 19 subsequent posts.

    NOTHING you have said gets us any closer to your answering or explaining how this magical global symmetrical failure occurred in 3 WTC buildings. Hint the hat has very little to do with it.


    19 posts and counting
     
  11. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Circled nothing is still nothing. You can post all the kindergarten blue text and flashies you like, but we are not impressed. The bottom line is that you people just can't grasp the simple fact that ten stories will crush one and that that means that you have mis-applied your entire religious dogma and made enormous asses of yourselves.
     
  12. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Calm down, and drop the name calling.

    This assertion you posted above is a false one.

    Do you understand and agree with the two questions posed to you?
     
  13. Mike12

    Mike12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    3,003
    Likes Received:
    851
    Trophy Points:
    113
    perilica has destroyed koko...

    this is what happens when a real expert takes some time to deal with these amateur truthers and why these amateurs haven't been able to gain any respect from the scientific community.
     
  14. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,698
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83

    The bottom line is that there was instantaneous global symmetric failure throughout a 200x200 ft building, a feat that can only be accomplished by demolition NOT by random fires spread throughout the building.

    You insist on claiming it was fires you have to PROVE how the failure occurred in the first place which gets us right back to the blue text and the reasons that you are running from responding on point as fast as you can.

    "Explaining how all load bearing columns suffered global symmetrical failure within milliseconds of each other from random office fires across a 200 x 200 ft building."

    The only people making asses of themselves are you people who continually duck the issue on the table!

    If I were on your side I would be running as fast as I could too! LMAO

    Using NISTS DATA:
    [​IMG]

    to answer the question "correctly" you hang yourselves.

    [​IMG]
     
  15. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They didn't. To state so is a false assertion.

    - - - Updated - - -

    "Crazy and Hostile".
     
  16. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,698
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    did I hear a liar
     
  17. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, if you were listening to your assertion.
     
  18. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,698
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    see events have a sequence, he jumped past my issue and went straight to this crashing down (*)(*)(*)(*), well we didnt get that far along the train of events, we are still at what caused the crashing down. NOT what happened immediately after the crashing down.

    first things first

    you dont need to be a physics genius to grasp that but you do need to keep up.

    first things first, how and what caused the GLOBAL symmetrical failure.

    I have this vision of little green men with blow torches each assigned to his own column to preheat watching a temperature gauge and a stop watch so they can get perfect timing for symmetrical collapse.

    see they were really designed well
    [​IMG]
     
  19. Mike12

    Mike12 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2012
    Messages:
    3,003
    Likes Received:
    851
    Trophy Points:
    113
    i see you as the one dodging perilica's questions and failing to follow his detailed accounts but i'll let him get back to you

    Also, who are you to challenge NIST findings? why should anyone listen to you?
     
  20. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,698
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    who is chandler? lil ole high school teacher forced nist to change their fraudulent graph to reflect building 7 freefall.

    who is anyone?

    See here is how strawman arguments work

    person a presents an issue challenging person b

    person b seeing they are in trouble dodges person a's issue by creating a different issue and claiming it was person a's issue.

    Its deceitful but thats what these guys do when someone like muah comes aaong and puts their panties in a twist.

    this is my issue that I placed on the table for debate

    "Explain how all load bearing columns suffered global symmetrical failure within milliseconds of each other from random office fires across a 200 x 200 ft building."

    it happens BEFORE any crashing down could occur that perilica's wants to discuss.

    first things first and in order of the event.

    I do not answer strawman question designed to evade my ORIGINAL issue. If you want you can be suckered into that, but count me out
     
  21. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nothing of the sort. All Perilica has done is dodge Kokomojojo's question. And it is really a simple question. We all know the answer to it. It's impossible. It's physically impossible for fires to have caused the global collapse of WTC building 7.
     
  22. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why is it 'impossible'?and it wasn't a 'global' collapse...it was gradual.
     
  23. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Your issue is a false assertion.
     
  24. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh, stop that. You people and your idiotic version of Newton have not explained how it is not possible for ten floors to crush one, thus to evenb prove that your brains are engaged here.
     
  25. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,698
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    not talking about newton, talking about failure mechanisms. you got your (*)(*)(*)(*) twisted again.

    "Explain how all load bearing columns suffered global symmetrical failure within milliseconds of each other from random office fires across a 200 x 200 ft building."

    that is the problem you are faced with. explain it.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page