“Early voting begins in Georgia with long lines

I'm not trying to trigger you. I don't know what about being a gun owning, Vietnam era veteran who supports the military, fiscally conservative, free trade supporting believer in American leadership, who used to like and vote for Republicans, has you spooked. Is it because I also support a safety net for the disadvantaged and needy, and support equality and oppose division? Sorry if I'm not conservative enough for your tastes. Don't get so triggered. Step up your game.

 

When you step in with a conservative narrative, I'll reconsider. So far, you're batting 0. If that is all you have, it's difficult to recognize your new found liberalism as a pointer. Just sayin.

 

I'm a neverTrumper. That's my narrative. I've given my positions on the military, guns, federal deficits, trade, American leadership and my voting record where applicable in the threads I've participated in. I know who I am. That you don't is of no consequence to me. But, trigger as you may. Whatever floats your boat.

 

^^^^^ and there it is. And now, given that "freedom" all semblance of actually being a conservative has been washed away. The real problem posters like this have is consistency. The inability to actually remember that they are supposed to be conservative, so, over time, again and again, we see them fail to even grasp the narrative, and instead insert whatever lame progressive talking point was appropriately delivered to them.

When someone says they're a "never trumper" that doesn't make them a conservative. Kamala Harris is a never trumper, and this poster seems to support her views more than not. Again, it's a question of consistency. And this poster certainly isn't.

 

I'm a moderate independent. I've never claimed anything else. Being a moderate independent makes me more conservative than Trump. I've been entirely consistent on all of it. You seem stuck on making this personal. I feel your pain, but really don't care.

 

I already did and called you on it

The canard you keep repeating, it doesn't take significant fraud to change the outcome of a close election and can have TREMENDOUS consequences.

 

United Food Stamps for everyone!

 

I talk about prevalence of voter fraud and you keeping saying my statement is false by pivoting to something I didn’t talk about - the outcome of elections.

If you want to talk about outcome of elections that’s another discussion, but it doesn’t only relate to fraud. It also relates to turnout. Making it easier for people to vote can result in a higher turnout and that gives a more accurate reflection of the will of the people.

You can’t look at either factor in isolation. Some ways of making it easier to vote will not increase the risk of fraud. Some may reduce it. Some may increase the risk, but that will be overwhelmed by the increased turnout, so a price worth paying. Some ways of making it easier to vote will increase the risk of fraud to unacceptable levels.

It isn’t a one dimensional question. Unfortunately a lot of people on both sides look at it that way for political advantage.

 

and so do we.... you are a supporter or Biden, Pelosi and the squad...

They support "almost peaceful" riots and looting, police defunding, anti-white racism, anti Christian bigotry, gun confiscation, open borders, court packing, green new deal, amnesty for illegals, outsourcing, socialism and socialized medicine, including for illegals.... lest we forget the corruption of the swamp, selling the country wholesale and retail to China and Russia, which is so aptly represented by the Biden criminal family.

you support Biden, Pelosi, the squad.... I haven't missed much of their agenda, have I?

 

Yes you have missed it completely. Biden doesn’t support any of those things.

 

Bernie says he does, Biden says he does, Kamala says he does and she does, AOC says they do...

that he occasionally attempts to split hairs and speak out of both sides of his lying corrupt swampy mouth (i.e. I have my own green new deal and I won't defund the police, I will realocate their funding) isn't fooling anyone... well, maybe you but rest assured, not anyone else. duh

 

That's because it's not only false, it's ridiculous.

 

You got one thing right. It's just an internet forum. You can't be expected to read all my posts.

 

Nope. Biden doesn’t support any of those things. If you say he does, prove it to.

 

My statement is that there’s no evidence of significant voter fraud. Do you say that statement is ridiculous?

 

I don't particularly care indeed how you twist yourself into a pretzel trying to reconcile your claims of conservatism with your support of Democrats' anti American, racist, fascist, anarcho-socialist, gun grabbing, flag-burning, job outsourcing, supreme court packing, economy destroying agenda.

 

You need to up your reading skills. You're obviously confused. I'm not gong to argue stupid nonsense. Have fun. Be safe.

 

certainly IS ridiculous. the whole point is that the mail-in approach provides incalculable opportunities to commit voter fraud and hide the evidence of voter fraud and that even "insignificant" voter fraud may be enough to change the result of a close election.
duh.

lest we forget that we do have a ton of evidence.... all those hundreds of thousands of incorrect ballots all over the country, in dozens of states, more and more cases reported daily... what do you think it is?

 

Sorry, I must have misread what you wrote.

 

What you lack is evidence.

This is the real world, you know the one with cops and judges, not the one with Democrats running pedophilia sex rings...

When this winds up in court, it usually gets laughed out of court, no evidence of organised fraud. My favorite case was in Virginia. This isn't the only case where the State couldn't come up with a single case of fraud as evidence, but their bumbling was entertaining.

 

LOL, like I said, the libs push a system deliberately designed to allow countless opportunities for virtually untraceable fraud and then claim no evidence. Typical leftist intellectually dishonest circular "logic". They think they are clever.
That being said, hundreds of thousands of ballots all over the country have already been incorrectly printed, mailed, misplaced..... the numbers are growing daily and the libs keep pretending that they just don't exists.... just like the riots and looting did not,.

PS What you lack is evidence that the good old trip to the polling station to vote is any more dangerous than a trip to the local grocery store. But the dems decided to replace it with a fraud-prone system nonetheless.

 

Fraud is easily traceable, which is why the odds of a fraudulent absentee ballot is 0.00006%.

Mistakes ain't fraud, you need better lies.

 

1. When hundreds of random people have access to my ballot (on its way to my mailbox, in my mailbox and on its way back to the polling place), the system is prone to virtually untraceable fraud - 0.00006% is the percentage of fraud that will be discovered.

2. This is not absentee ballot we are talking about. Your attempts to conflate them show that you have no leg to stand on...

3. Hundreds of thousands of american citizens have already been disenfranchised by faulty ballots and the libs are splitting hairs whether it was fraud or "mistake". Guess what, the corrupt democrat system is prone to both fraud and mistakes and the people are equally disenfranchised regardless. Jeez.

 

Nice fantasy, but that's all it is.

You guys will believe anything, feel free to prove me wrong. If you know anything about this, you know you can't.

But I do love the projection, Republicans love disenfranchising people, well, mostly minorities of a certain hue..

 

I could not help but notice, you've failed to provide even a shred of evidence that the old and reliable way of voting at the polling place that you are replacing with a corrupt fraud/mistake-prone system is any more dangerous than a trip to a supermarket. I wonder why