As the UN document stated, the voting on that did happen, but the PLO never fulfilled the voting, hence since the voting was never been fulfilled, then te Charter wasnt amended in any way. Do you know that Intentions are not actuall actions? For example: "Jimmy intended to go to football practice, but instead he chose to stay at home and watch netfilx." According to the passage, did Jimmy go to football practice? If no , then you cant say that Bibi really dragged Oslo, because as you could see "Intentions" are not "actuall actions". So if you are saying that "Withdrawals are only good if it means Israel has less responsibility over Arabs residing in Gaza Strip and West Bank.", then you are support Wye and Hebron Agreements that was a withdrawals of lands of the West Bank and giving it to the Arabs responsibility. And yet again, this sentence of yours contradicts you previous statement that you said that you are against Wye and Hebron Agreements. I never said you do. As I already told you: Carmi (like all of the people that you cited that were "former" of something) he is today ordinery citizen like you and I, thus it makes him no more importent that you and I. What he toady is saying it's only his own opinion and nothing more. I never said that you say that. And still it doesnt mean that he necceserily should kill another Jew, there is alot more acitons that this person can do that are legal without kill someone. The fact that Ehud Barak is the most decorated soldier, it doesnt necceserily means that his opinion carries heavy weight. The fact that Ehud Barak is the mose decorated soldier in Israel is only means that he was brave, with great shape etc. . His opinions today are his own opinions, and thus his opinions has no special weight then yours or mine. As I already wrote to you: I already read what you provided here in the third time, and still what you provided here does not answer my question. My question was who were the men that were identified, what were their names, and yet I didnt get names. So once again: what were the names of those settlers that been identified? And still the fact that they did not cooperate in the interogation is not bad. A citizen has all the right to not cooperate in an interogation. Moreover, you say that they were identified- what were their names? So if the officer already knew who was the perpetrator, then what was his name? So if they were identified, what were their names? It does not contradicts what was written in it. And it is not contradicting the fact that such memo can be used in a future nagotiation. I never talked about Kiryat Arba regarding the memo. Please read what I'm writing to you. Kiryat Arabs has permits to exist. Moreover, here is the policy options from the memo: As you can see, the "Policy Options" in the memo does not state that the Jews have the right of return as long it will be under the "Palestinian" state. So if Eliezer Waldman WAS the chief rabbi of Kyriat Arba, then his opnions today does not relevent, since, once again, he is not the chief rabbi of Kiryat Arba. You havent answered my question, just repeated yourself. Once again: Did you made a survey and checked if most of the settler in those settlements are extremists? Because if not then you are just generelizing.