AI: Up to 13000 Hanged by Assad in Saydnaya Prison

Uhhh, I have news for you Margot. The first city conquered in Syria by the Sunni jihadists was Homs, and the first thing they did was to tell the 60 thousand Christians living there to leave or be killed. But that's nothing new, they have been ethnically cleansed from the Near and Middle East for centuries. I say we give the land back to the Christians and kick out all the Sunnis... unless they want to become 'dhimmis'.

 

link to any western respected source?

 

After Assad and Putin, I wonder who the monster of the day will be.

 

Amnesty International is a Soros organization, which means they see atrocities only if they benefit Soros' one world government agenda...

This doesn't mean that Amnesty International is not factual, only that it's giving its adherents a very small and narrow perception of events.

 

George Soros is the greatest philanthropist at present. All the propaganda you find on the Net against him is basically from the perspective of racists and nazis.

 

Are they? Okay if you say so.

(say something often enough . . . ? )

 

Well, President Trump obviously? Come on Jeannette, get a grip!

 

How could we connect Soros with Syria?
What benefits would he get if he will divulge the atrocities of Assad?

 

Please type this one in red as well "Amnesty International",
I did not say so.

 

Lefties keep telling me that American prisoners are the worst treated in the world.

 

Some nonsense about a "strong arm," a reference to US-caused accidental civilian deaths due to drone strikes and some nonsense about the US causing suffering is not a defense.

This is inhumane treatment of prisoners and mass murder, you dolt. It is sad that the US has caused as much death and suffering as it has, whether intentionally or unintentionally, but that does not justify this!

 

As you probably know, Amnesty International is a human rights organisation with its own agenda (including fund-raising??) and doesn't know what goes on inside Syrian prisons, or the prisons of any other country for that matter, any more than you or I do. The more they highlight supposed human rights infringements and injustices, the more they advertise themselves, and they do that to attract public and government donations. In other words it's a business, with business interests.

 

Putin supports Assad. Trump supports Putin. Many RWers in this forum love Trump and Putin. Are they hypocrites?

- - - Updated - - -

Case in point. Why do some support assad, trump, and putin?

 

RWers seem to be a dumb lot in who they support in Syria. It changes with Faux.
Hate Assad, love Putin. They are in bed together, but some are to dim to know what the want or believe.

- - - Updated - - -

The regime, Assad, the R's wanted ousted. Dimwit these R's are.

- - - Updated - - -

The whole, almost RW world of the USA.
See the typical RW view, straight above ^^^^^. The terrorists were fighting against Assad. RW wanted to back Assad. After they wanted to oust Assad. But obama wouldn't back Assad, now the RW wants to side with Assad and Putin.

 

How come if they won the 1977 Nobel prize and The United Nations Prize in the Field of Human Rights in 1978?
Could you support your claim that it's a business?

 

You still have no clue what you post.

 

I'm afraid I can't - any more than I can support my belief that many other charities are businesses, but from observing their activities over the years with increasing cynicism, I just know they are.

 

Okay if you say so.
But I beg to differ for donors will eventually retract if they will find out that their donations are squandered.

 

There will always be enough donors to charities because it either brings on 'the feel-good factor' where public donors are concerned, and is great PR advertising for commercial donors. I agree that some will withdraw but they'll soon be replaced by others. We don't often hear of charities which have gone bankrupt?

 

Would you agree that if somebody knows that someone did withdraw because of ill reasons, there will be second thoughts of indulging. But I have a question would you propose to defunct such an institution which defends human rights? just because they were donated. I do believe that any organization will eventually collapse if they did not function as how they should and as how they are supported.

 

No, but as you will have guessed, I regard them with a great deal of scepticism and suspicion, and like to keep my beady eye on them.

 

Bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

The Right has never supported Assad. On the other hand, LW leaders such as Blinky Pelosi and Hillary Clinton were notorious for heaping praise on the Great Reformer.

Another fact you're conveniently forgetting in your little exposition in revisionist history is that RWers like McCain were calling on President Red Line to get on top of the situation from the beginning, but being the feckless "progressive" that he is, he dithered and waffled just like he dithered and waffled on the links while ISIS overran central Iraq and sawed the heads off of American journalists.

I'm sure Obama would be glad to find that individuals such as yourself are still dedicated to his cult of personality...



It's all about Barry, all the time...
.

 

Have you not read the posts from RW's in your thread (and in previous threads)?

Do you support the actions of Putin? Who is allied with Putin?

 

Homs' population reflects Syria's general religious diversity, and is made up primarily of Sunni Muslims, with minorities of Alawite Muslims, Eastern Orthodox Christians and Syriac Orthodox Christians......

Your answer sort of surprised me.. I said that Iran was colonizing Syria with Shia settlers from Iran, Iraq and Lebanon.

 

I'm aware that there are some RWers who support Assad for one reason or another, but that doesn't mean the Right supports him. I'm a RWer and I have never supported him.

No, I don't support Vlad the Invader and I have actively debunked the propaganda that his admirers have disseminated on his behalf to excuse his revanchist escapades in both Ukraine and Georgia. I was one of the people who stated at the onset of the Obama administration that their "Russian Reset" wasn't going to work, but Obama labored under the delusion that you can change the attitude and behavior of anti-American thugs by appeasing them.

Who is allied with Putin? Assad. The Islamofascist regime in Iran. Do you support the sham Iran nuke "deal" with Putin's allies in Tehran? I don't, but it's a dream come true for many on the Left.