Ban importing chritianity to developing countries

What religion told them they couldn't get it with dry sex?

You cannot really expect the church to hand out condoms, but the Church should not be against them.

If one cannot do without sex, it is better to have condoms, and even for Gays to marry, than for people to burn in lust and kill us all with a mutated fruit loop virus.

 

if that’s what the people choose yes

 

mutated fruit loop virus?

 

Exactly. Pedophiles go to work where they can access children, unfortunately.

 

You are lying.
It is easy to prove.
1. You are an atheist. Atheists always lie or repeat lies.
2. If something even close to what you describe happened, all pederasts, atheists and other pervert of MSM would be all over it. Since you cannot link to usual insinuation and perversion by BBC or MSNBC to such an accident, you and your wife have made it up. May be you have made your wife up, too.


I am not even mentioning that it contradicts teaching and practice of fundamentalist Christians one can observe with his own eyes. I am not mentioning that because it has been already efficiently proven in 1. and 2. that you are lying.

 

Am I lying? You sound like a Christian on a guilt trip after reading my post.

Look buddy, not much comes out of Laos by way of the mainstream media. The international media possibly believes Laos is a little too insignificant to run stories that might sell newspapers.

I'll give you a couple of examples of events recently.

1. Four more children killed and three people injured from a UXO explosion last week. Ordinances dropped by American aircrews who by every chance were Christian.

http://www.vientianetimes.org.la/FreeContent/FreeContent_Four.htm

2. Do you realise there is a bit of a war going on in the Golden Triangle of Laos between the Lao, Thai and Chinese militaries against criminal gangs on the Mekong? 13 Chinese boat crew members have been killed.

http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/local/277199/outlaws-on-the-mekong

 

Granny says just so long as dey...

... ban importin' dat Mooslamicism...

... into the good ol' U.S. of A.

 

What does that have to do with Christians running aorund bulldozing schools?

Let me remind you, you atheists like tor emind us that you are right there on those battlefields with us.

http://www.atheists.org/military

Of course, when something bad happens? Why, just like I charged earlier, it was the Christians who did it - not you guys right there with us? Amazing how that works.

Not too mention, attempting to claim UXO are somehow nefarious is stupid beyond belief. Those bombs are dropped on known supply routes that were teeming with enemy activity. We do drop bombs on our enemies in war correct?

And sometimes those bombs do not explode when they land, and they are buried and forgotten about. When they return to the surface, they are usually found and an explosives team removes them or detonbates them. Sometimes, luck is not with us, and they go off. Its an accident, certainly not some vast conspiracy coming out of Rome.

Perhaps if you weren't blinded by religious zealotry, you would look for better solutions then blaming air crews in a war to make yourself feel better. You might also mention the atheist Vietnamese and their actions, leading to plenty of UXO of their own, after we savage Christians left. Maybe pay attention to what our adversaries were doing there as well - if you don't mind.

Somehow I doubt it.

 

no muslims to blame for any problems there?

 

ever read about the path of destruction left behind by missionaries in your history books.. untold misery, disease, slavery and kaka..

run them out of town..el pronto..

have any of you ever been to a small impoverished town in a 3rd world country..seen hundreds living in cardboard boxes and dreaming of a cup of rice..I have..sex is their only joy because they have nothing else..is a god going to help them..hell NO..
and don't think they're lazy..they'd work doing anything you ask em to..

 

You have a very limited knowledge of Lao history, or you are basing your knowledge on an American view only.

 

I would say the latter.

australia has been involved in cleaning up UXos and land mines, but the US is like a badly behaved child dropping litter around the place, and oblivious to the consequences.

because it doesn't suit the US to know what long term damage their wars have done.

that is why they are not signatory to the ottowa treaty, and why they have pushed the UN to lift the ban on cluster bombs.

 

The Convention on Cluster Munitions includes the usage, manufacturing, stockpiling and transportation of cluster munitions.

Australia signed the treat but reneged on the stockpiling and transportation.

I'm ashamed of the Australian government in this regard.

 

I am basing my knowledge on the logistical realities of North Vietnam moving troops and supplies down the Ho Chi Minh trail and teh fact that the Loatian Civil War erupted as a direct result of that activity - which is what lead to US intervention in Loas in the first place.

You make an awful lot of assumption to avoid the simple fact that you blamed Christians in error and provided evidence that was very different than the charge you levelled.

Once again, it would be good for atheists to realize that they are not more intelligent than everyone by default. Such assumptions, as we can see, easily lead you astray.

 

We are not a signature to the Ottowa treaty because of the likely consequences on a battlefield. Maybe you would like to write the letters to the mothers of Soldiers and Marines that said, "Sorry, we had a weapon that could have saved your son's life, but we signed a treaty that gave our enemies an advantage that they exploited - no worries though, we retain the moral high ground!"

Its very easy to castigate, but when you are responsible for someone's life? For providing victory to your country? Its a little bit of a different equation.

 

A couple of errors in your post.

1. There were parts of Laos well away from the Ho Chi Minh Trails (I use trails because there was more than one) which were heavily bombed. Bokeo province on the Thai/Burmese border copped a pounding. Luang Namtha province on the Chinese border was also bombed. The bombings also took place within 75 kilometres of the capital Vientiane. My friend's youngest brother, aged eight years, was killed by a UXO just outside Thalat, 75 kilometres north of Vientiane. The American military started pounding Laos in May 1964, three months before the Gulf of Tonkin Incident and 10 months before the commencement of Rolling Thunder.

2. America was the cause of the Lao civil war. The American government supported the elected government of Laos, while the CIA secretly supported the Neutalists lead by Kong Le and in 1960 the CIA aided Kong Le in the overthrow of the Lao government. A coalition was formed but the left wing element of the Neutralists moved their allegiances to the Pathet Lao. It was the CIA's aim to destablise Laos.

 

Amazing, the entire Indo-China conflict begins with the US, eh?

And clearly there was only one side to the war? Only one side ever dropped ordance anywhere?

Amazingly enough, the atheists in the conflict were angelic, righteous, and who cares abou the atrocities they commited before and after the US involvement?

Only the US is wrong when it goes to war.

There is a difference in acknowledging US mistakes during the Vietnam War and making the US responsible for everything.

And certainly, nothing above justifies the blaimg Christianity for bombs dropped by ... someone, duirng a lengthy process that explode .... and somehow bulldoze schools.

Atheists.

 

yes i said you are lying. as you wake up in the morning you go. you were lying about No rice had been planted in that village because the rice field was totally destroyed by a bulldozer because of fundamentalist Christians.

I made 2 proofs that you were lying.

Your reply is a confirmation that they both are true in all words and points.

now you post new lies and perversions. if i go through them you will come up with another bunch. And so you'll go until you will not wake up one morning.

 

thats a very convenient strategy.

when someone presents you with information that disagrees with what you want to believe, call them a liar.

that way you don't have to consider wshether there is something isn what they have to say

 

while there are a lot of good things our govt does, unfortunatelky there are a few areas where they seem to backtrack on commitments - I suspect this is often due to their sycophantic relationship with the US, but is also related to their not wanting to rock the boat with major trading partners.

 

I'm now wondering about your age. Does your mamma know you are using her computer?

Never mind, we all know UXOs don't kill and maim today in Laos, it's just propaganda. And care to visit the families of the 13 killed Chinese crewmen and tell them it really didn't happen?

 

This is what I'm thinking. Gutless bastards!

 

They should ban religion from the practices of carrying VD to infect the host population, and taking their children away from their parents, and other missionary stuff they did to the Native Americans, and the Alaskins, and the Hawaiians. That is not moral, and it is not what god wanted. but they do it anyway and continue to do it.

 

so you are saying that African men are to stupid to figure out how to not spread the virus on their own ?

Perhaps they should be allowed to have their gene line stopped in its tracks.

 

She does.

I proved that you lied about buldozing the rice fields because of Christians. You keep on coming with more lies and perversions, but you don't understand that it does not change my proof and I need not multiply it. my proof stands solid. atheists always lie and pervert. It is proven.