CDC admits the jabs made hospitalizations worse!

@Kokomojojo When are you going to give an honest answer to this graphic/link!

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...lizations-worse.616993/page-4#post-1074693204

 

Thats actually a fact, anyone keeping tabs on VAERS were witnesses, Dr Jessica Rose publicized it and of course was demonized for telling the truth in a world based in lies. She was also called to testify to the fact in a Senate Committee hearing.

 

DOOD! That is so ****ing funny! I poked fun of that ever since I was a youngster! Everytime Id be out of town with friends would warn them we have to be extra careful because we are within 25 miles of home! Funny that youd mention that one!

Its most often spun to promote some agenda.

 

Meanwhile you are running away from a table presented to you a dozen times and evaded!

 

They couldnt get natural mRNA to work so they went into their junk drawer and came up with a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA which is a synthetic messenger RNA in which some nucleosides are replaced by synthetic nucleoside analogues. Thats the real problem here and why we see so many diseases thought eradicated, untreatable cancers etc starting to surface.

 

Well folks, it appears we have this guy checkmated and he is afraid to respond honestly.

 

I posted where it came from several times, it was ignored, and gave the link and it was ignored so now I am just sitting back watching all the spamming of my thread and crying!

 

You posted an image on page 1, post #16 about some crap concerning insurance analysts. NO LINK was provided then or since, despite requests to do so.

You have evaded at every opportunity explaining the graph from actual data sources, showing that your claim is horseshit. We now are being treated to useless single line responses that amount to complete evasion.

 

Wow So untruthful!

 

but you said you cant use that source!

so neither can you!

2 foot shots and 10 toes at the same time!

 

A lie.

You lied, so yes I most certainly can.

Are you afraid to address this data, so much, that you evade it at all costs?

 

Yep here it is!

You use the same data base I used for the same purpose!

your chart shows vaccine effectiveness!



Therefore 100% contradiction!

 

False. For some baffling reason you have lifted quotes from another thread, totally unrelated to the graph you have been asked to address.

Why are you so afraid to be wrong?

 

Same subject spammed across several threads does not get anyone off the hook!

Let me clarify that:

 

A lie. This has not been spammed on to any other thread!

Nowhere have you answered this.

 

Let me clarify that a little more!

 

And the doctors have agreed that there were instances of myocarditis in vaccinated individuals. That doesn't make it a universal problem. You had a few thousand cases of myocarditis out of hundreds of millions of vaccinations. I don't see it as a vaccine killing fear. I doubt it is much different statistically than side effects of every vaccine every used. They all have side effects. It is why they require professional application. Why do drugs require prescriptions? Because they have side effects.

 

It's common. A lot of statistics are used that way. One shouldn't take them at face value without some active analysis.

 

I wasn't aware that natural mRNA existed. I have always considered that the technology is synthetic. I'll do some research before I comment.

 

Covid vax has more disabling side effects than all vaxs combined!


From Vellner the gal that created the new VAERS system


See this thread: http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/mrna-vax-unprecedented-side-effects.617145/


When you tire of all the bravdo here are independent expert labs/scientists/microbiologists to fill in the blanks

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...n-toxic-shuts-down-your-immune-system.617143/

 

@Kokomojojo When are you going to give an honest answer to this graphic/link!

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...lizations-worse.616993/page-4#post-1074693204


Writing big red letters across a graph that inconveniently debunks your claim is quite deceptive. This graph DOES appear in another thread - YOU spammed it there! Now be brave and honest and answer the statements.

You posted an image on page 1, post #16 about some crap concerning insurance analysts. NO LINK was provided then or since, despite requests to do so.

You have evaded at every opportunity explaining the graph from actual data sources, showing that your claim is horseshit.

 

Still contradicting yourself, now starting to shoot the fingers off too!
You seem think people are blind and cant see the games you are playing out here.

 

People are waiting for you to answer the graph. I really don't know what kind of person can deliberately avoid data that proves them wrong because they are afraid to BE wrong. Your games have a specific name and they are really quite pathetic.

You have evaded at every opportunity explaining the graph from actual data sources, showing that your claim is horseshit.

 

If the data is no good for my vax comparison its no good for your vax comparison, your claims have been BUSTED I have no reson to respond!

UNLESS you want to retract your bogus claim in every thread you spammed it in.

 

Your problem: For some reason you seem to think this data is connected to your other dead thread. I don't quite know what screw-up you have made to come to this conclusion. It is not.

Some truly sick irony from somebody who has created a dozen threads more or less the same, who cross posts the same crap from one to another, who systematically evades and deflects in responding to rebuttal.

You are afraid to answer a post that you specifically asked for the data source, whilst you yourself failed in post #16 to supply one.