CDC admits the jabs made hospitalizations worse!

Yes and you totally contradicted yourself BUSTED now trying to bluff your way out of it, hilarious!

 

For some baffling reason you have lifted quotes from another thread, totally unrelated to the graph you have been asked to address. You make the lie about some baffling contradiction and then avoid, yet again, answering this graoh.

Why are you so afraid to be wrong?


Writing big red letters across a graph that inconveniently debunks your claim is quite deceptive. This graph DOES appear in another thread - YOU spammed it there! Now be brave and honest and answer the statements.

You posted an image on page 1, post #16 about some crap concerning insurance analysts. NO LINK was provided then or since, despite requests to do so.

You have evaded at every opportunity explaining the graph from actual data sources, showing that your claim is horseshit.

 

Answer the questions posed to you. Deceptively writing busted across a screenshot doesn't work. You have lifted half a screenshot from the other thread that you couldn't understand. Then added it to this thread, to a graph you are afraid to explain.

 

Hilarious, ^^^ says the person that can't explain it!

 

Your "hilarity" is noted.

 

This isn't a "dance" and it isn't over. What we have is a baffling level of evasion and diversion. Anything but respond to the graph below.

The problem is not my inability to explain anything it is the total failure to understand a simple medical report! The above idiotic "busted" image is NOTHING whatsoever to do with the graph below. This person is simply running away from the graph below by linking it to something from another thread, totally irrelevant to this one!

 

More information to consider if a person is at a very low risk to the bodies reaction to covid 19 infection.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/healt...=Among hospitalized patients,the authors said.

 

Good old "epoch times" giving its own spin on things! Best to go to the actual report and see how THEY word it!

Frontiers | Brief research report: impact of vaccination on antibody responses and mortality from severe COVID-19 (frontiersin.org)
"One explanation of our findings might be that of hospitalized patients, Vax patients tend to be less healthy. In support of this, we found that Charlson’s Comorbidity Index score (CCI) was significantly higher in Vax vs. NVax (p=0.0002) patients [Figure 2A (iii)]. Additionally, age differed significantly between Vax (68 years) and NVax (62 years) patients [p=0.01, Figure 2A (iv)]. However, other factors are likely relevant and CCI or age may not be sufficient to stratify risk, as even when patients with similar CCI/age were compared, we still observed significantly (p=0.02) improved survival in NVax patients (Figure 2B). Importantly our results do not address the overall efficacy of vaccination with regards to mortality in a general population, as our analysis is limited to patients with severe infection admitted to the OSU hospital."

"While our investigation raises potentially important questions regarding the generalizability of vaccine efficacy, several limitations (including the small sample size) may impact the findings. Accordingly, these results require validation with further studies involving larger cohorts and must be interpreted cautiously. Further, the small sample size did not allow us to carefully evaluate the role of individual comorbidities [including immunosuppression, cancer, diabetes and pulmonary disease highly prevalent among the Vax patients (Supplementary Table 1)] that might influence Ab production."

 

You obviously missed the following from the Epoch Times article quote that I posted. But good on you for taking the time to read the referenced paper.

 

Nope.

Unlike you it appears.

 

So, the vaccine causes cancer? I wonder what stage we're at for the cancer to society anti-vaxxers are causing to this country.

 

Please, spare us your faulty parallels.

Even the most recent vaccines reduce your chance of getting infected for short periods.

 

Thanks, doc.