Charges: Masked Gunmen Invade Minneapolis Home and Rape Woman, Daughter

Firstly, the FBI changed the way they gauge rape a few years back:

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/cjis-link/march-2012/ucr-program-changes-definition-of-rape

In 2011 there were 14,611 rapes in the USA of which 9,504 were perpetrated by Whites (which since 1987 has included Hispanics until only recently changed). Blacks perpetrated 4,811 and the rest interspersed among various other minorities, e.g,, Native Americans, etc. However, when you factor in that even at these rates, and with Blacks being approx. 12% of the pop., the numbers are very disproportionate. Since we don't know what number of the "White" rapists were Hispanic we cannot have a true total. But, using other vectors regarding Hispanic violent crime we can assume it's a large percentage of the 9,504.

 

I don't deny blacks are "over-represented" percentage-wise in the rape (among others) statistics.

But it shouldn't matter that non-hispanic whites and hispanic-whites are both listed as white.

FBI also lumps all native Americans/Alaskan natives together.

And Asians are not further divided into East Asians, Southeast Asians, etc.

 

WHAT? Of course Hispanics skew the stats because their cultures are the most violent in the hemisphere with 43 of the 50 most violent cities in the World being Hispanic/Brazilian. Seriously, do you really know anything about crime or just what you read?

 

Apparently, this author doesn't consider the rape, assaulted, robbed of non-white women and children to be no big deal....

 

Despite the cherry picking, I just don't care about the difference.

Blacks are blacks.
Natives are natives.
Asians are Asians.

And whites are whites.

 

And they probably count bogus cases like the Duke LaCrosse case.

 

You don't understand percentages or ratios very well do you? And since when do Hispanics get a break from identification in rape stats? But wait, that's the liberal way. Gays don't have a separate category when defining violence among themselves, but will damn well count so called hate crimes when they were victimized by straights. Of course you have to be a protected class of the Democratic Party. Therefore the answer is no to are more people raped by Whites.

 

It wasn't as if the Dems just up and left. Regan needed the South and so implemented the Southern Strategy, turning the Repubs right to attract them. As the Dems (not the Repubs) had just passed the CRA, the conservative wing was in a state of rebellion (not unlike the current TP faction in the Republican party) and so were open to Reagan's overters. The influx of conservatives and Reagan's leadership in turn forced out the liberals who's only choice was to go to the Dems due to our 2 party system. If the Repubs had never abandoned their founding principles the Democratic would have likely collapsed under the weight of it's political contradictions.

 

lol.

The democrats (to include democrat Robert Byrd, a former KKK grand wizard) FILIBUSTERED the CRA in 1964. The CRA, by the way, was essentially the same bill written by Eisenhower (a republican) in 1957, which had been struck down by racist democrats numerous times prior. LBJ, who had been a straight-line segregationist prior to this, signed the bill into law after having been passed by a larger percentage of REPUBLICANS than democrats. This heralded the switch from OVERT and VIOLENT democrat racism, to the policies still in place today, of subjugation, division and dependence. LBJ proudly declared (behind closed doors, of course) "We'll have those (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)s voting democrat for the next 200 years!", and they probably will.

 

It is the worst nightmare for ANY family man no matter what the race.

 

Let's not forget the media tripping over themselves to label this guy as white:



I know plenty of Mexicans here in LA who would kick your ass if you called them white. They even call it "brown pride." Apparently you are allowed to have any kind of racial pride except for the white kind... until, of course, the media needs to turn you into a white guy to perpetuate the narrative.

 

careful now, a lot of these race baiting dingbats think Hispanic is a race.

 

Because clearly they are white, right?

 

You said Republicans, as if it was a part of their party platform.

 

Thus completely missing the point of the thread.

 

Perhaps you could let the DOJ know?

http://time.com/4065359/california-prison-release-department-of-justice/

 

Except for the fact that he himself identified as white, which is why he is listed as white in the original Sanford PD Police report. There's also the fact that his dad is German...

What's your point? So because some Mexicans don't consider themselves white, means white hispanics don't exist?

Also, nobody has a problem with Italian pride, German pride, Irish pride, etc. My neighbor always puts up her German flag during the World Cup. I work with an Italian American who always roots for Italy, not the American team. Actually, what's funny is right wingers/Libertarians have a HUGE problem with Mexican pride/Mexican Americans rooting for Mexico, but when someone "White European", even if they are American born, or citizens, does it, you don't hear a peep out of them. Funny how that works, eh?

- - - Updated - - -

Congrats, you found one hispanic that isn't white. Want me to post a picture of one who is white?

 

I got nothing.

 

The ACLU would never allow it.

 

Actually I see what looks to be hundreds in that picture who are not white. Try looking again?

But since Hispanic isn't a race according to you, how do you classify this guy? We both agree he isn't white. He doesn't look Asian, he doesn't look black, so what is he?

 

Come here to LA and call a Mexican 'white.'

I'll drive you to the hospital then...

- - - Updated - - -

Mexicans are?

 

Looks Native American.

- - - Updated - - -

Mexican = A nationality.

 

I am about as white as they come, of French and Tyrolean origin. I am automatically disqualified from a Mexican gang. Go ahead, tell them they're white. I dare you.

 

The ones who are white, I'd call them white. The ones who are not, I won't. You do realize Mexican is a nationality, right?

 

Oh, so you were actually disagreeing with Athelite earlier when you responded to his post. He doesn't mind the classification of Hispanics as whites, but as we've just determined, they might be better classified as "Native Americans". What tribe does this guy belong to, you figure?