Charges: Masked Gunmen Invade Minneapolis Home and Rape Woman, Daughter

So is French, like my family. But I am white.

Here, let me illustrate...

White:



Not white:



Mexican, actually. See the difference?

- - - Updated - - -

There are no white Mexicans in Mexican gangs.

 

They should get rid of the hispanic label entirely. The ones who are white, are white, the ones who are black, are black, etc. We both know that the white nationalist crew don't have a problem with hispanics that look like Ted Cruz, but despise the ones who look like Sammy Sosa, or Danny Trejo.

 

What have you proven here? Mexican is a nationality, you do understand that, right?

Prove it. Libertarians are becoming very obsessed with skin color similar to their conservative brethren.

 

I don't think I've ever disagreed with the point that there are white people in the Hispanic world. There was a guy I met once who had long blond hair, blue eyes, typical Aryan type and I was shocked when he started speaking perfect Spanish. He was from Argentina. Had more typically white features than I did, and I'm almost 100% Scandinavian (genetics tested).

However, the overwhelming majority of "Hispanics", both in the country already and coming here every year, are not white. They look more like the picture I posted, which we both determined, are not white.

 

Some progressives have posting histories that focus almost exclusively on race relations discussions, so why can't libertarians discuss the topic?

 

Prove it. Also, chances are a lot of the people in that crowd you posted have a large percentage of European DNA.

 

So that makes them white? I thought we just determined they weren't?

 

Likely mixed race.

 

Which still puts you at odds with Athelite's premise. Your reply made it sound like you were in agreement, but you were actually not in agreement at all.

 

they allow it for death row inmates, why not for murderers?

 

My response was that most conservatives consider hispanic a race, which they do, well, at least when it's convenient.

If a hispanic who looked like Sammy Sosa punched another hispanic that looked like Ted Cruz, conservatives would be here screaming about "black on white hate crime", so it depends on the circumstances.

 

I said the right would be saying that.... it was as ridiculous as the post I was replying too, that was the point

 

Nah I didn't.

The "points"

1) White people are seeing that the future will no longer be dominated by whites, so they are securing that future by having less babies.

2) Obama's fault that this happened.

3) Black men rape more white girls than white men rape black, and this hurt the feelings of those who are keeping this kind of scores.

Or something of that sort....

 

I think the point of this thread was to use a horrific tragedy to spread more anti black propaganda. It's a common trend on political forums like these, sadly.

 

The point of punishment is to teach criminals a lesson, which means it must eventually end. Lwop isn't punishment, it's pointless torture. It serves no purpose other than for somebody's sadistic gratification. Those who would condone that are wicked enough to deserve it.

These men are beyond punishment. We must dispose of them quickly and cleanly, without disgracing ourselves in the process.

Innocent people are only ever convicted in cases based on indirect, circumstantial evidence.
The death penalty should only apply in cases based on direct evidence because that eliminates the possibility of innocence.
The two victims in this case provide all the direct evidence required to qualify the death penalty.

 

did you read my link, he was convicted on forensic evidence... bite marks, they got it wrong and sent him to death row

in fact in his case two juries found him guilty, both were wrong

http://www.forejustice.org/wc/ray_krone_JD_vol2_i9.htm

 

What are you basing that on?

 

Statistics, but it's from a Government reporting agency. I don't think I have a libertarian source on it.

 

Are you incapable of discussing an issue without resorting to snarky, girlish comments?

Can you produce these statistics?

 

I've produced these statistics dozens of times. Yesterday, in fact. Here you go:

http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus0502.pdf (Table 42)

0.0 percent of black rape victims claimed a white person was the perpetrator of the crime

 

I don't follow you around and remember every post you've ever made.

Noted.

 

I never claimed you did. I was answering your question on whether or not I could produce the statistics.

So what do you think about them? Tens of thousands of white women victimized by black males, with no black females victimized by white men.

 

Last I checked, the Right doesn't run MSNBC. You might want to take that up with the other media operatives since they're the ones who stoked racial tension.

 

Exactly my point. Forensic evidence is circumstantial. Those cases should not have qualified for the death penalty.

 

But plenty of white females victimized by white males. Perhaps white male rapists have little preference for or proximity to black female victims.