Climate Activist Greta

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Just A Man, Sep 24, 2019.

  1. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No it's not.

    If I'm responding to your non answer with my interpretation of your non answer, that's not a strawman.

    Try answering the question next time.
     
  2. redeemer216

    redeemer216 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2013
    Messages:
    1,598
    Likes Received:
    421
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Um, yes it is. In that exact quote I said scientists needed to be there and you responded with "so, never". Doesn't even follow. The question itself was a completely leading question in that it encouraged a non answer since the actual question had no answer. How the hell would I or anyone else know when scientists are going to present at the UN and how is it relevant besides being a misdirection tactic?
     
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2019
  3. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh I can't wait.

    Who do you think the "expert" will be?
     
  4. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, you just started complaining about "how we wouldn't listen" creating your own strawman to which I simply acknowledged your dodge.
     
  5. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh. I see.

    So you admit that the only people standing up there telling us we're all about to die do not include ANY actual scientists.
     
  6. redeemer216

    redeemer216 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2013
    Messages:
    1,598
    Likes Received:
    421
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Would or would you not listen to these experts? regardless of their so called personal past. In regards to your other posts here, the answer is no as you have literally attacked one scientist out of a large group (the hockey guy) in order to discredit the rest of them and misdirect the conservation. It happens every time and it's hilarious to me watching the pattern. And if not, it definitely wasn't a strawman to imply you wouldn't listen to them regardless. Good for you on being one of the fallacy kings of this forum. Can only say that about a couple people on here, so it is an honor.
     
  7. redeemer216

    redeemer216 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2013
    Messages:
    1,598
    Likes Received:
    421
    Trophy Points:
    83
    So now you agree. Good. So greta is right we should be listening to experts. Glad we can all agree then.
     
  8. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'll always listen to a cogent argument presented that is willing to undertake scrutiny and answer questions.

    I asked earlier and you didn't answer this question: why would anyone deny AGW if they believed it was real?
     
  9. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm not sure what makes them experts.

    Not a single AGW prediction has actually come to pass over the last 60 years.
     
  10. redeemer216

    redeemer216 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2013
    Messages:
    1,598
    Likes Received:
    421
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I received your paradoxically leading question and deferred it to the ether where it belongs. Plus you'd have to give me the context if it were to make sense... if that even makes sense. Until then it goes in the recycle bin.
     
  11. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    32,338
    Likes Received:
    15,854
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hilarious...
     
    redeemer216 likes this.
  12. vman12

    vman12 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2015
    Messages:
    66,736
    Likes Received:
    46,529
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Asking why people deny AGW if they're just doing it for political reasons is too hard for you to come up with an answer for?

    Not really a hard question but everyone has to stay in their lane I guess.
     
  13. redeemer216

    redeemer216 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2013
    Messages:
    1,598
    Likes Received:
    421
    Trophy Points:
    83
    That wasn't what you asked. Regardless, why are you asking me this? I don't deny AGW.
    This video should be the auto response to about 80 percent of the responses on here. It's valid.
     
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2019
    ECA likes this.
  14. ECA

    ECA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    32,338
    Likes Received:
    15,854
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Absolutely
     
  15. redeemer216

    redeemer216 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2013
    Messages:
    1,598
    Likes Received:
    421
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Interesting piece. This is how you do an actual critique without attacking the person. I'm still debating in my head what to think but was a good watch.

    Also interesting. That glare though. Disgraceful. :banana:
     
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2019
  16. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Where specifically?
    Here's your chance to shine
     
  17. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yer looking for ways to Believe in the Climate Change Power grab.
    The same thrust that is being mounted against a duly-elected
    sitting President.
    Climate CANNOT be *altered.At least Not by human activity.
    If you think it can you are a great example of the movie :
    - The Rainmaker - { 1956 } with an all-star cast.
    When during the Depression a con artist { Burt Lancaster } who
    travels around in his covered wagon looking for ways to hoodwink
    Impressionable people and maybe score some dough or free lodging.
    There's a severe drought in the territory he is travelling thru and goes
    into his Rainmaker act.
    We've been thru this drill before Bubba.Stop being so Impressionable.
     
  18. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,158
    Likes Received:
    5,912
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yawn.....
     
  19. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,158
    Likes Received:
    5,912
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Against dullards, that’s easy.
     
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2019
  20. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,158
    Likes Received:
    5,912
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You’re absolutely right. It’s much worse. The effects of AGW were understated.
     
  21. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yer another one who is incapable of spotting a fraud.
    Historically Frauds are part of society.A very big part of history.
    Whether Religion or Territory or Mores { Morals }.
    That is why it is of utmost importance to go back and
    use the Humanities or Reason & Logic.Not ALARMIST
    Groupthink.We've been thru this before in the Dada Period.
    The Period during World War I and how those in France
    used Dadaism to humiliate the seriousness of war.
    Using art and poetry and other means to Reject logic and
    reason in order to make an impression on the populace.
    Same thing is happening today in the U.S.
     
  22. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Do its
    1, 2, 3 go!
     
  23. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I accept your concession
     
  24. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Have I ever got a neat group got you to join.
    Not Charles Manson's freakniks who found safe harbor
    in living off other's { Spawn Ranch } and making trips into
    L.A. to heist food wherever { Garbage cans or begging }
    Or maybe cults like Jim Jones.Just follow his every word.
    Today it's Climate Change { rerouted from Global Warming }
    because Americans can't be that duped.We have Cooler summers
    on whole.The occasional Hot week or two in the dog days like
    July or this year august.But nothing like in the 80's.
    Or heaven forbide the The Dust Bowl 1930's.
    You are being used or Stooged.Nothing more.
    Climate Change is a Power grab to indoctrinate Globalism.
    Whatever happened to that Ice Age that TIME magazine had on it
    cover in the 1970's.
    Technically we're In an Ice Age.Where a certain percentage of the Earth's
    surface is Ice.You weren't even aware of that I bet.
     
  25. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm pretty doggone sure what makes them Experts.
    Because they got Funding from Al Gore as he was Big on EPA
    issues while Vice President.After his loss in 2000 to Bush and the
    Florida Recount Fiasco and Gore just incapable for giving up his
    lifelong dream to be the President he went into action.First demonizing
    Bush and then using his contacts to usher in a new Movement to make
    himself known.Gore is the one who made it possible for Climate Scientist
    to get the needed funding.Without Funding Scientist are almost nonexistent.
    So Gore used Scientist he knew were prone to desired results.
    That desired result was Global Warming.And any independent Scientist
    who dared to write Peer Reviews that refute or complicate Gore's chosen
    hand-picked Global Warming bunch were either Not Published or made
    public.The exact same model used today { our Corrupted MSM }
    who write nothing but Negative { over 90% } articles about Trump.
    It's an Insider elitist Cabal of people looking to profit and have
    summer homes by Hoodwinking the Populace.
    Meaning it Pays to be corrupt and shilling for a leftist Agenda.
    There is no doubting this.It's rampant.Legion.Open yer eyes.
    Globalist Goldfingers like George Soros and son are major benefactors.
    Soros is The Biggest Benefactor to the ACLU the last few years.
    Which is why the ACLU has turned nutty.
     
    vman12 likes this.

Share This Page