Cuccinelli losing by 17%

$175 trillion in red ink; 1000% of GDP?? and you want more??

If that is "most Amerikans", and that is moderate - what would the "radical left" look like?? lol...

I've worked most of my life to stop this train wreck - to no avail. There are simply too many people like you. Ignorant, narcissistic, belligerent - you deserve to lose your freedom.

 

Republicans, historically, have represented what most Americans believe. Today, they do not... they've become liberalized, because they want to feel liked by the mainstream media and Liberals. Unfortunately, they're the best we've got in many states, so Conservatives will make a showing for them. However, when a true Conservative takes to the podium and challenges the establishment and the liberals, get ready for a true Conservative win. Put a real Conservative in a national election and I bet he/she wins. There's a reason why liberals pretend to be conservative, during campaigns, and then turn a 180 and govern liberal.

How many times did Obama say we need to stop reckless spending? How many times did he say we need to balance the budget? He even called increasing the debt unpatriotic. He was also against gay marriage, before he was for it.

- - - Updated - - -

The only people who compromise are the Republicans... Democrats never do. Republicans sacrifice their principles and values at every chance they get. It's time for someone who will actually stand for their principles and values.

 

Looks like McAuliffe is losing his swagger: http://washingtonexaminer.com/as-cuccinelli-rebounds-mcauliffe-warns-he-could-lose/article/2538282

 

You seem to be confused. Being a Right Winger (Conservative) does not have to be a set of broad values that everyone shares. You can be a Right Winger in economics and still be a left winger about other things (gay marriage?!). That does not mean your a sell out they are just your views yet the TEA party loons only want "true right wingers" who fit every criteria running the country.

Its the equivalent of some extremist left winger saying all democrats must denounce god. Its pure lunacy.

You can be a free market billionaire Establishment Republican yet still hold religious conservatives in contempt.

 

Ok YOU CANT TOUCH THIS !!!!!!! an neither can any where else, for all our troubles best country on the planet

 

Kevin your first sentence makes you wrong buddy MOST AMERICANS it is not most americans its less than half

 

I think that after requiring a Government Shutdown because he would not delay" Abominalcare" nor discuss the matter and now he has to, is having a Reality Check on his personality and over confidence.

In hind sight, Obama would have saved face by cooperating with Cruz and letting the public assume "Abominalcare" was delayed by the Republicans, not because they government can do anything Big right and smoothly.

 

Care to comment on Cuccinelli's drubbing, or are you just going to ignore the thread?

 

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...r_cuccinelli_vs_mcauliffe_vs_sarvis-4111.html

Still at almost 8% average. No change. McAuliffe just doing a last minute get out the vote speech.

 

Latest Emerson College poll says +2 McAwful, leaving an average of 7.5%. Ken's closing the gap and with all of the headliner rallies this weekend and Monday (with Mark Levin, Marco Rubio, Scott Walker, Ron Paul, Bob Erlich, et al), I can see him actually pull ahead and possibly win this - especially with the Obamacare debacle hanging over the heads of Democrats.

 

What does this have to do with what I said?

- - - Updated - - -

Used to be.

 

40% - Conservative
35% - Moderate
20% - Liberal

More Americans are Conservative than there are Liberals or Moderates. That's what I mean by that.

 

It is possible, but a lot of GOP in his state refused to help him, he was largely funded by the Tea Party and Christian groups, and he is now broke. It is possible but he will lose by 5% by my measure.

 

Still over a 6% lead on average. Emerson isn't exactly known as a political laser beam. LoL!
Good luck.

- - - Updated - - -

So less than half, as the poster you are responding to stated.
Great to see people in agreement.

 

Yeah, the GOP needs more candidates like Cuccinelli, I agree with you there.....

 

But 60% aren't conservative, which explains Cuccinelli's poll numbers.

 

The Democrats agree with this as well.

 

No, they actually don't. They try to push Republicans into getting more McCains into office. Why do you think that is?

 

They loved the witch from Maryland, and the crazy gunslinger Sharon Angles, the suicide choice of Palin, and on and on and on. How do Democrats "push" more moderate candidates? What influence do they have in the Republican primaries?
Democrats salivate when the hysterical far right candidates do well in primaries. The general elections are nearly over when the crazies become candidates.
Cuccinelli is the latest version of GOP suicide. They were running against a candidate with serious weaknesses and managed to find a candidate that could lose to him.
The Democrats schedule vacation time for poll workers when candidates like this get through the primaries.

 

Last time I checked McAuliffe was ahead only by 2 points

 

You're confused.

They were scared to death of Angles and O'Donnell (not to mention Palin): two Right-wing, Constitutionally Conservative, Tea Party women. That is why they attacked them personally. And it's hilarious, because the Democratic Party is supposed to be the Party of Women's Rights. In reality, they're the Chauvinist Party that demonizes and throws women under the bus at every turn.... just look at who the fall guys are in Obama's administration. Look at how Clinton treats/treated women... JFK, Ted Kennedy, Anthony Weiner, Terry McAuliffe, Bob Filner, etc. The list goes on, because they're "for women" about as much as Hitler loved Jews.

The only way Liberals win, is if they demonize and lie about their opposition (and their own policies). And if they didn't have the mainstream media in their court, going to bat for them on a daily basis, they'd have no leg to stand on. They use Saul Alinsky tactics on a very consistent basis.

The opinion of Democrats holds weight with the establishment Republicans. If a Democrat complains about compromise, the liberals in the Republican party will cry for more compromise in their own party and demonize the Tea Party representatives. It happens all the time.

 

BTW, that spread has shrunk, once again, from 7.5% to 6.7%. That means that in less than half a month McAuliffe's lead has shrunk from 17% to 6.7%.

Something to note... Sarvis has come out in opposition to Austrian Economics. so I'm pretty sure he's a plant (probably from the Dems), as Austrian Economics is one of the bedrocks in Libertarianism. There's a reason Ron Paul is propping up Cucinnelli.

Regardless, Sarvis support is also waning, which is good news for Cucinnelli. It's going to be a very close election... but it shouldn't be. McAuliffe is such a (*)(*)(*)(*) poor candidate, even for a Liberal.

 

When did you check? March?

 

Not in the least bit confused.
Nothing has to be made up about these lunatics. They open their mouths and bury themselves. The Democrats LOVED watching the Republican primary debates as the idiocy of the far right candidates revealed itself over and over again, picking them off with their own words and lunacy. It was like a party for Dems to watch.
If you want to move forward, you have to confront this truth.

 

Please remind me of the instances of lunacy...