Evidence severely lacking for claim that most of Flight 93 had buried

Who's time am I wasting?

 

You want evidence of my claims?

Contact the people on the scene, like I did. Simplicity.

I'm not doing your truth seeking for you.

 

I wasn't on the scene, so I can't give you any specific percentage to how much was buried, nor am I fixated on how much was buried. Because the debris was found in the ground, on the ground, in the trees, in the lake, and that's official.

Btw, lol at the bolded part.

I'm not even going to bother asking for your evidence proving the plane was planted, because we both know you don't have any.

 

Outside of everyone who's read this thread, your own?

Maybe I shouldn't give you the benefit of the doubt, for I suspect this "may" be your intent.

 

http://www.devvy.com/flight_93_part_3.html

The author did not say precisely what percentage of the plane was buried.

 

Yes, will you show evidence that you have evidence that proves most of 93 was buried?

 

Certainly; go directly to the source I provided to you.
They will confirm my observations.

 

LOL, then why did you ask?!!!

Can the lack of evidence be evidence?

For instance, if a women claims she was raped, but there is no evidence proving that, isn't that evidence she wasn't raped? Not saying that's proof she wasn't raped, just saying is that evidence she wasn't raped?

 

Then why are you participating in this thread? No one is forcing you.

Why do you care?

Funny, that's what I think is your guy's intent, to waste time. Hannibal is surely proving that.

 

What's your point?

 

I've said "Go to the source" plenty of times.

If you still refuse, the problem is yours. I'm done.

 

Hannibal, do you agree that public evidence is severely lacking for claim that most of Flight 93 had buried?

yes or no

 

What did not disintegrate was buried. Don't know if anyone calculated a percentage or not.

Even if they did and it was 43%, I doubt that you would be satisfied.

 

I know what the story is. That's what we are trying to prove, or disprove.

Try me.

 

Whether it was buried or precisely what amount?

 

Whether it was buried, or not.

 

Honestly,I'm not sure if Suede isn't trying to cut down the mightiest tree in the forest with a red herring

 

What's the red herring?

 

Guys, if you claim to have proof of something, post the link. Don't continue posting in the thread unless you are prepared to actually contribute something.

Saying that 'evidence has been posted elsewhere in the forum' is not going to cut it. If you are asked to provide a source, then provide one, or make an argument, instead of trolling.

 

http://www.devvy.com/flight_93_part_3.html

I provided you a link to a source -- a real person, investigative journalist Devvy Kidd, not an anonnymous YouTube poster -- that cited eyewitness accounts that specifically stated that "the ground swallowed what didn't disintegrate".

She also explained the physical characteristics of land that has been strip mined that make this not only possible but probable for a plane crashing into the ground at a steep angle and at over 500 mph.

This linked source also contained the quote that she has seen similar circumstances at other crash sites.

 

I must have missed that. Please post the actually quotes.

I don't really care if it's possible or probable, I only care if it happened or not.

Means nothing to prove another alleged crash.

 

I already did -- in Post #155 of this thread. But, I'll do it again.

http://www.devvy.com/flight_93_part_3.html

See above.

Supporting evidence for when you say "It's never happened before.".

 

You said "that cited eyewitness accounts that specifically stated that..."

Who were these eyewitnesses?

People saying so doesn't cut it. Lot of people say they've seen Bigfoot.

Got to admit, never heard of this crash. Link to verify?

 

She interviewed the following people. Her interviews are all linked in the article.
Wallace Miller the county coroner
Kirk Swauger, Somerset Bureau Chief, The Tribune-Democrat newspaper
former Mayor, Ernest Stull
Residents Nevin Lambert and Nena Lensbouer

As I suspected. Eye witness accounts aren't good enough for you. What are they supposed to do? Provide you with photo or video evidence, which you would say was faked anyway? Build you a time machine and take you back to the morning of the crash?

Lots of people say that plane parts were planted but you seem to believe them even though you don't have their names and they were not eye witnesses to the alleged "planting of plane parts"

The journalist did not mention any specifics. Her quote was

The focus of her article was Flight 93. Interestingly enough, she does not treat the 9/11 story with kid gloves. There are lots of aspects of the "official" story, as you like to call it, that she is uncomfortable with even when it comes to Flight 93.

But she does say that . . .

and

And as you stated.

Whether it was "most" or 51% or 42%, I do not know and neither do you.

 

I'm simply asking you to show me the specific witnesses accounts to the plane being buried.

I don't think anything was staged by planting it in the ground before 9/11, so after if there is video showing the ground, them digging the ground, then the debris being uncovered, I'd believe that. Or photos of embedded debris or piles of debris around the excavated hole.

Regardless, doesn't prove another plane buried.

Good...

for...

her.

Some saying 2/3rd, 80%, and 90+% have been shown. Can't believe all the photograph evidence shows >1% and no video evidence. Amazing.