FBI Seizes Oath Keeper Lawyer’s Phone in “Seditious Conspiracy” Investigation

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Bush Lawyer, Sep 12, 2021.

  1. Condor060

    Condor060 Banned Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2018
    Messages:
    20,939
    Likes Received:
    15,446
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You would think Pearl Harbor was attacked on Jan 6.
     
    AmericanNationalist likes this.
  2. stone6

    stone6 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2019
    Messages:
    9,281
    Likes Received:
    2,780
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    There were thousands at the Capitol. Over 800 illegally entered. Over 600 have been charged with everything from misdemeanors to felonies. And, these were federal crimes. While there have also been federal violations elsewhere, the vast majority stemmed from local violence growing out of state and local law. You'd have to define the specific crimes you want to discuss.
     
    Hey Now likes this.
  3. Hey Now

    Hey Now Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2021
    Messages:
    17,719
    Likes Received:
    14,140
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, just the center of governance in America, the Capitol.
     
  4. stone6

    stone6 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2019
    Messages:
    9,281
    Likes Received:
    2,780
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That's what the investigation is for...I believe there are around 31 oath keepers under investigation for seditious conspiracy...one has pleaded guilty so far.
     
    Hey Now likes this.
  5. HB Surfer

    HB Surfer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    34,707
    Likes Received:
    21,899
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No one has pleaded guilty to Sedition. Quit with the propaganda.
     
  6. stone6

    stone6 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2019
    Messages:
    9,281
    Likes Received:
    2,780
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    He was asking them to break the law. Civil disobedience is not a presidential prerogative.
     
  7. stone6

    stone6 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2019
    Messages:
    9,281
    Likes Received:
    2,780
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I presume the one pleading guilty to seditious conspiracy is pleading guilty to seditious conspiracy.
     
    Hey Now likes this.
  8. Polydectes

    Polydectes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    53,631
    Likes Received:
    18,211
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The reason why nobody seems to cares because she was wearing a red hat.
     
    Bob Newhart likes this.
  9. Polydectes

    Polydectes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    53,631
    Likes Received:
    18,211
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Compared to 8 months of BLM riots it was the orders of magnitude more peaceful. Didn't even burn anything down or create an autonomous zone.
     
  10. Polydectes

    Polydectes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    53,631
    Likes Received:
    18,211
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The FBI certainly didn't care but then what do we expect from the Federal bureau of incompetence.
     
    AmericanNationalist likes this.
  11. AmericanNationalist

    AmericanNationalist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2013
    Messages:
    41,184
    Likes Received:
    20,958
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No one asked for a link yet, but I'm going to ask for the link.
     
  12. stone6

    stone6 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2019
    Messages:
    9,281
    Likes Received:
    2,780
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No problem...Newsmax, September 13, 2021, "Oath Keeper Members Indicted in Plot to Storm U.S. Capitol." It points to three indicted, one of whom has said they'll plead guilty. The other two haven't pled yet. The others are under investigation. Lawyers can't claim "client privilege," if it can be shown they are part off a conspiracy.
     
    Last edited: Sep 13, 2021
  13. Condor060

    Condor060 Banned Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2018
    Messages:
    20,939
    Likes Received:
    15,446
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And I hope every one gets 20 years. I wonder how many have been hunted down with the same enthusiasm for attempting to burn down federal court houses, assault at the SCOTUS, taking over the city of Seattle, burning down the church at the WH and attacking and wounding over 50 Capital officers at the WH?

    We already have a compromised FBI. How many people in this country are going to get behind this investigation if its just the one incident while everything else is overlooked. Do you feel its more important to just get Trump at all cost, or find a way to stop the division in this country. What good is it going to do even if everyone who were in attendance goes to prison if more than half the country thinks its nothing but a political stunt?

    If the long game is of no interest then swing away. Go after Trump with everything you can muster. But when your all done with that, you haven't resolved anything but your own hatred for one person. I don't give a s*** what happens to Trump. What I do know is if this becomes a political one way street, you haven't seen the end of the problem. All you did was fan the flames.
     
    Polydectes likes this.
  14. Condor060

    Condor060 Banned Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2018
    Messages:
    20,939
    Likes Received:
    15,446
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You mean a riot at the capital. Unless you thought they were going to take over the government and start executing politicians.
    Is that what you thought?
     
  15. Bob Newhart

    Bob Newhart Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2021
    Messages:
    3,684
    Likes Received:
    1,477
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Maybe you should read up on events before making invalid statements. It will help. :)

    https://www.fox2detroit.com/news/le...aulting-wife-after-argument-at-swingers-party

    https://www.mlive.com/news/grand-ra...ormant-to-lie-delete-texts-attorney-says.html

    https://www.jstor.org/stable/26402433

    So, what else is the FBI hiding . . . .

    FBI agents regularly get innocent people to take a plea deal.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opini...utors-are-coercing-plea-deals-yes-ncna1034201

    So, yeah, I suggest reading more than DNC talking points.
     
    Last edited: Sep 13, 2021
  16. HB Surfer

    HB Surfer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    34,707
    Likes Received:
    21,899
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A link would be nice.
     
  17. stone6

    stone6 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2019
    Messages:
    9,281
    Likes Received:
    2,780
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The only federal court building I know of that was recently attacked was in Portland, Oregon. Trump sent federal Marshals in and a number of people were arrested and charged with federal crimes. I don't know of the outcome. Not sure what happened at the Supreme Court. I would assume that people there would have also been arrested for crimes. Ditto on the Church fire...although only one room was burned. The attack on the WH...Capitol Police wouldn't have been involved...more like the Secret Service and the D.C. Police. Same thing...although I don't think there was any serious penetration of the WH itself (maybe one person, who sort of wandered in). Trump denies he was taken to "the safe location" because of the protest, but was only on a tour, to explain to him where it was and what it looked like, just in case. While no large organization is perfect, the FBI generally does a good job as the investigatory agency of DoJ. DoJ uses the same bar for indictment as for a jury conviction, "beyond a reasonable doubt." As a result, the get a 90%+ conviction rate by juries...but maybe you don't trust juries either?
     
  18. stone6

    stone6 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2019
    Messages:
    9,281
    Likes Received:
    2,780
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    See post #187.
     
  19. Bush Lawyer

    Bush Lawyer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2018
    Messages:
    15,333
    Likes Received:
    9,736
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Can you provides examples....actual events?
     
    Hey Now likes this.
  20. Bob Newhart

    Bob Newhart Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2021
    Messages:
    3,684
    Likes Received:
    1,477
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's in the court filings. Can you look up and read them?
     
  21. Condor060

    Condor060 Banned Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2018
    Messages:
    20,939
    Likes Received:
    15,446
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    They get 90% conviction rates for a reason.
    1. They do investigations before arrest. Not like your local law enforcement. Their case is already made.
    2. They have a lot of power to force people into plea deals and most don't have 2 million for attorney fees to fight them
    3. They can hold you indefinably without bond.
    4. The can coerce you into a plea deal and its legal and nowhere is that more true today than our criminal justice system, which features a streamlined process for transforming millions of suspects into convicted criminals quickly, efficiently and without the hassle of a constitutionally prescribed jury trial. It’s called coercive plea bargaining, and it’s the secret sauce that helps us maintain the world’s highest incarceration rate.

    Of the roughly 80,000 federal prosecutions initiated in 2018, just two percent went to trial. More than 97 percent of federal criminal convictions are obtained through plea bargains. Why are people so eager to confess their guilt instead of challenging the government to prove their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt to the satisfaction of a unanimous jury?
    They’re being coerced.
    .
     
    AmericanNationalist likes this.
  22. mdrobster

    mdrobster Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    Messages:
    34,385
    Likes Received:
    12,988
    Trophy Points:
    113

    This was your statement.
    Ever heard of the "attempted kidnapping" of the Michigan governor - yet another case falling apart.

    Now those people are in jail :)
     
    Zorro likes this.
  23. FatBack

    FatBack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    53,137
    Likes Received:
    49,491
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    With not a single firearm, anywhere but in cops hands...some "insurrection" or "coup"....
     
  24. HB Surfer

    HB Surfer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    34,707
    Likes Received:
    21,899
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So... no link. Thanks for playing.
     
  25. balancing act

    balancing act Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2020
    Messages:
    4,091
    Likes Received:
    3,711
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Thanks! That I agree with you that the things you stated are legal. I have a very different view on it, but legally Trump has insulated himself pretty well and he probably won't get charged, as he didn't do anything illegal.
    But as a leader! Wow, a real leader would have been down there when they went there, only partially because he said he would. If he had wanted a peaceful non-violent protest, he would have done something to help that. He had the crowd hanging on his words WHILE it went on and he didn't say anything about stopping the violence for over 90 minutes, and didn't appear on the news with a message until over 3 hours after it started. LINK Illegal? I'm no legal expert, but that type of behavior and "leadership" is not good for our country. There's been partisanship for as long as we've had a government, but some things should transcend that. I liked Bill Clinton overall, but he made some critical errors, like allowed the president of the united states to be in a position of blackmail or coersion.There's a reason that I don't hold the "legality" thing as the only factor. We haven't had great choices for a while, though. I did not vote for Trump in 2016, but I hoped he would change my mind and do a great job, but he was what i figured. Then I had to vote for Biden. I like him........in 2008! He is not what he was. But he wasn't Trump.
     
    Last edited: Sep 13, 2021

Share This Page