Fire can't melt, bend, and warp steel?

Too bad there was no thermite or traces of thermite found anywhere in the wreckage of the WTC.

The former is not necessary to get the latter.

http://www.cracked.com/article_15693_the-10-most-ridiculous-inventions-ever-patented.html

 

thats not true there was lots of thermate found thats what the problem is.









how did fire dissolve so much steel?

NIST Chief criminal Gross showing off the steel they didnt think check for explosives or accelerants.








oh yeh think 10,000 years of corrosion can happen in 50. RIGHT!

and all that concentrated heat deformation

and dissolved iron

 

There was exactly zero thermite or thermite residue found anywhere in the debris of the WTC. There was no melted or molten steel found anywhere in the debris of the WTC.

Fire didn't. Corrosion did.

Well... ignoring the idiotic numbers you pulled out of your ass, the corrosion found in the debris of the WTC is not extraordinary. I gave you a paper to read. Go read it.

Assumes facts not in evidence.

Iron doesn't dissolve. It does, however, corrode.

 

You just proved the facts for the truth movement. See all those columns still standing? If those massive office fires could cause a large steel structure to collapse, then why didn't it collapse? Because it is impossible just like office fires did not collapse the WTC buildings. That is what the high rise building professionals are saying in architects and engineers for 9/11 truth "Experts Speak Out" YouTube video. You should watch it sometime. Some of them have more than 40 years experience in building construction.

 

It is the new Fizix for the 21st century because Newton's laws are over 300 years old and outdated.

 

Those columns are sheathed in concrete, unlike the ones at the WTC and the ones that failed at Windsor. The steel portion of the building in the photos ... Collapsed.

 

Too bad all of them are wrong.

 

only those steel columns without concrete collapsed.

all reinforce concrete beams remained.

you see, steel without concrete reinforcement is easily weakened, buckled, and bent by office fires.

just like what happened on 9-11.

 

Actually, they are. Newton's laws were replaced by Einstein's about a century ago. But other than a demonstration of just another layer of your factual ignorance, that really makes no difference regarding the events of the WTC collapses.

There is not a truther alive that has earned the respect of serious people.

 

In less than 15 seconds?

 

Really? What is Einstein's Third Law of Motion?

- - - Updated - - -

How long did that building burn?

 

http://www.dummies.com/how-to/content/einsteins-special-relativity.html

 

In none of the WTC buildings did it tale the fires less than 40 minutes.

 

The theory of special relativity.

 

Okay then. da nu Fizix 4 a nu centry.

 

Could there be a better example of why truthers are comedic punchlines?

 

I don't know, man. There's so many to pick from.

 

what language is this?

 

Jargon is actually one way cult leaders isolate their congregation from critical thought. It's called "loading the language."

 

Jojospeak. "If you can't supply evidence, speak in gibberish."

 

dats text speek 4 da nu centry it gos along wit nu Fizix an nu Maph so bilding calaphses kan b blamed on ofice firrs.

 

It hardly matters. Truthism is gibberish in any language.

 

http://www.theness.com/index.php/the-prey-of-cults/

http://www.ex-cult.org/fwbo/CofC.htm

The cult of 9/11 is no different.

 

Text speak is abbreviation. When you "abbreviate" a four letter word into another four letter word, it's not text speak. It's stupidity.

 

Now I see why you didn not want to discuss the thermite cutter

http://www.ae911truth.org/news/41-a...ence-at-wtc-cited-by-former-cdi-employee.html