Hillary a liar? When? Where? How? Inform us.

Be so kind as to post where I supported or even said that Trump has not lied. Quite n assumption on your part and typical of liberals, putting words in another's mouth and then demanding that others defend your statement.

Not a wonderful thought process, since in fact I do not support Trump and have stuck to the topic of the thread. You should try it.

 

LOL, you are the one that inferred you were in the know to be able to so confidently call him a liar when you have no clue of his worth. Tripling down on your lie now.

 

Or you can admit that you posted things of which you have no personal knowledge, only that which provided by a hit piece of the opposition. And you put it forward as an iron clad fact. Claiming things you have no direct knowledge of as fact is a lie. See how that works?

 

Creating a question that sets someone's statements up as lies is not Schizophrenia. It's called dishonesty.

 

When a politician's support base exposes serious character flaws it has far more credibility. Clinton's key support within the MSM are now exposing Clinton to preserve their own credibility.

“WASHINGTON (AP) — Key assertions by Hillary Clinton in defense of her email practices have collapsed under FBI scrutiny.
The agency's yearlong investigation found that she did not, as she claimed, turn over all her work-related messages for release. It found that her private email server did carry classified emails, also contrary to her past statements. And it made clear that Clinton used many devices to send and receive email despite her statements that she set up her email system so that she only needed to carry one.” AP FACT CHECK: Clinton email claims collapse under FBI probe, By STEPHEN BRAUN and JACK GILLUM, Jul. 6, 2016 4:01 AM EDT

http://www.bigstory.ap.org/artic

So, yes, Clinton is a proven liar.

 

You have just described Hillary Clinton and her dishonesty.

 

LOL, she was asked questions and she lied. What a set up.

 

I have no problem you do, now focus like a laser and try again they are simple questions and if you don't know those answers then you are attempting to debate our of ignorance there have been two official investigations which addressed those claims she made.

Was her shadow server approved for official use by the State Dept IT, security and legal officials as she claimed?

Did it meet all the regulations that were in place as she claimed?

 

Find just one source that thinks Trumps worth is actually ten billion. Just one and then you will have a case. Bet you can't. But I have posted a respected conservative source that said Trump lied and can post many more. So find just one or go home.

 

Well here is a list of at least 101 of Trump's lies. Please try to disprove any one you can.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/4834/trumps-101-lies-hank-berrien

You can't even begin to compare the number of Trump's lies with those few misstatements of Hillary but it will be hilarious to watch you try. Maybe just for starters try the Trump lie that he opposed the invasion of Iraq. Or perhaps that he opposed the action in Libya. Or perhaps his claim of a ten billion net worth. Or Even just one of the endless lies in the posted link.

For a Trump Supporter to hang his hat on Hillary being a lier is an act that defines stupidity considering Trump's record of lying.

 

All of the news outlets when Trump first announced. Now you just go home.

 

Considering Hillary' Forty years in public life and the continuing stream of lies she has told, not a reach. Unless you are another one who denies she has ever lied. Not bright.

 

*snip
Let's do this:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=trump+net+worth
then this
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=hillary+net+worth

One of these people got their money from legit business dealings;The other did not.

Who got a lot of money for the Clinton foundation from foreign interests?
List of Clinton foundation donors:
AUSAID **
Stephen L. Bing
Commonwealth of Australia ** *
COPRESIDA
Tom Golisano ^
J.B. and M.K. Pritzker Family Foundation
Kingdom of Norway [Government of Norway] **
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Denis J. O'Brien and Digicel
Cheryl and Haim Saban & The Saban Family Foundation
Susie Tompkins Buell Fund of the Marin Community Foundation
The Elma Foundation
The Hunter Foundation *
The Rockefeller Foundation
The Swedish Postcode Lottery
The Victor Pinchuk Foundation
Theodore W. Waitt
S. Daniel Abraham
Sheikh Mohammed H. Al-Amoudi
C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, Inc.
Elton John Aids Foundation
Government of the Netherlands **
Irish Aid **
John D. Mackay *
Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD) **
OCP Corporation
Michael Schumacher
State of Kuwait
The Clinton Family Foundation
The Coca-Cola Company
The Wasserman Foundation
Tracfone Wireless, Inc.
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership (Canada)
Fred Eychaner and Alphawood Foundation
Frank Giustra, The Radcliffe Foundation
Nationale Postcode Loterij *
The Children's Investment Fund Foundation
UNITAID

https://www.clintonfoundation.org/contributors?category=Greater+than+$25,000,000

That's all while she's Secretary of State and not doing her job.
Not protecting America's embassies and all that.

 

Just a further observation, why are you so intent on changing the topic to Trump lies when the OP was about Clinton lies. Kind of desperate.

 

Sorry but you chimed in on the subject of Trump's lies lies about his wealth so we thought you had something to contribute but clearly you have no evidence to support Trump's claims so maybe time for you to change the subject.

Or did you forget your post #361.

 

I forgot nothing. You apparently are intent on ignoring the OP subject. You just keep going back to off topic posts. You seem to think that whenever you want to hijack a thread it is just fine, regardless of how off topic you are. Very telling in that you appear to not be able to defend your parties candidate on the subject or why else keep changing the subject.

 

Wouldn't you want to change the subject when your candidate is a congenital liar? She has been at this awhile.

 

How many of his involved the endangerment and the extremely careless handling of our national security and acts as a high government official?

 

Well since Trump has never held any public office Hillary wins that minor category although there is no evidence except in Trump's deranged mind that national security was actually harmed.

 

Obviously you didn't read the OP so I will give you a quote:

" Perhaps I'm wrong and someone out there can provide an example, but my concern is whether this widespread belief in her dishonesty might be a result of non-thinking voters listening to Trump's pompous propensity to call everyone he disagrees with or competes with some form of derogatory or disrespectful name, and simply accepting Trump's accusations as if they were fact, without regard to the truth."

Note that Trump's honesty is clearly part of the OP. Suggest next time you feel a need to make silly statements you actually bother to read the OP instead of just the Title.

- - - Updated - - -

See above post. Guess you didn't actually read the OP either.

 

LOL, she was labeled a congenital liar in the 90s. Gonna try and blame that on Trump?

 

ROTFL now isn't that rich the issue is they are both running for the highest office of the public trust, the highest office when it comes to national security but that is just a "minor catagory". And yes Clinton endangered our national security and then lied about it.

 

And you obviously do not care to reply to the request in the OP. Attacking Trump and giving Clinton a pass, even making excuses for her lies, seems to be what you are all about. Did you receive a liberal education? If so, you should demand your money back.

 

"Misstatements"! That underlines the problem Trump's critics are having now - they have sacrificed their credibility.

It is not just Trump supporters who know that he opposed the Iraq war.

“Look, the war is a disaster. The war should not have been entered into,” he told the Dallas Morning News in a July 2004 interview. “To lose all of those thousands and thousands of people, on our side and their side. I mean, you have Iraqi kids, not only our soldiers, walking around with no legs, no arms, no faces. All for no reason. It is a disgrace.” The Surprisingly Strong Progressive Case For Donald Trump BY JUDD LEGUM JUL 25, 2015 8:57 AM
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2015/07/25/3684164/case-for-donald-trump/

 

30k emails you dummy
where are they?
if nothing to hide, why delete?
where was she during bhengazi?
how did she get 140million$?