Is the 9/11 Scam Coming Undone?

Discussion in '9/11' started by Sly Lampost, May 16, 2016.

  1. Katzenjammer

    Katzenjammer New Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2016
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    has it ever occurred to any of the supporters of the official story, that attempts have been made to submit papers for peer review, and have been refused by the academic community. The BIG LIE is very strong in this society.
     
  2. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LOLOL. You didn't even wipe that rubbish off when you extracted it from your fundament! Of all the nonsense I'll read today, you win. If any papers were rejected it was because they weren't up to standard, but I know it is a lie. Even Jones and Harritt had to commit fraud to pretend their papers went under peer review-yes, they lied didn't they?
     
  3. Katzenjammer

    Katzenjammer New Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2016
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I submit to this forum, that "peer review" in its classical form, is dead,
    long live internet review, people continue to publish their work on the internet and its constantly under review by all who read it.
    this is a far more fair system than having some sort of establishment publishers pick and choose what they will give there blessing to, and what not.
     
  4. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That would just make a mess of the process as every idiot would be able to stall the process.

    There's that ol' false generalisation again. 'Scientists=bad; Cranks=good', except of course the so-called scientists 9/11 truth-they're above reproach! LOLOL That kind of dualistic thinking should be abandoned by the time an individual reaches High School.
     
  5. Katzenjammer

    Katzenjammer New Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2016
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    " 'Scientists=bad; Cranks=good', " and obvious projection on the truth movement by someone who obviously disagrees with said movement.
    Never have I exalted the work of "cranks" over good science, however there are times when individuals parading out their degrees to justify
    calls for blind obedience to some sort of anti-science .... I have my limits!
     
  6. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why does the truth movement keep proving my point then? Your claim is specious and projects much. *SIGH* Don't start that crap.

    And your opinion of the matter is noted and ignored. Try disproving the science and discuss the matter on that level if you want to be taken seriously. Only other truthers are interested in low level posts.
     
  7. Katzenjammer

    Katzenjammer New Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2016
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Will anyone actually address the point,
    that is in order to create that nose punch out hole in the tower wall, there would have to be mass displaced,
    now an aircraft allegedly traveling at 540 mph, would experience what sort of jolt upon contact and overcoming the inertia of said mass?
    come on now, this is freshman physics stuff. Who wants to actually discuss the fact that the airliner crash as depicted in the Evan Fairbanks video,
    would be totally impossible to do......
     
  8. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Addressed and shown to be specious. Try again.
     
  9. Katzenjammer

    Katzenjammer New Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2016
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    exactly where & when was this addressed? Pointer to a post, or something?
     
  10. DoctorSmith

    DoctorSmith Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2016
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    foundation for this assertion please.
     
  11. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    6,576
    Likes Received:
    2,321
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Foundation for that statement?
     
  12. Blues63

    Blues63 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,110
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I know it's a novel concept, but try reading the thread.
     

Share This Page