Is the Holy Bible the timeline for mankind's existence?

Those aren't 100% effective either.

 

I had to smile when you quoted Clinton - it's obvious to me that he was just joking about "who really killed JFK" and UFOs.

 

It's even more than that duranduranvndal...

Chronologically, the Bible begins in the Beginning

Then moves to the beginning of Creation. .

Goes through one Major LINE (pre-fall|fall/unreemed)

Goes through another Major LINE (unredeemed|redeemed) JESUS

Zips passed our Present

and ends up at the beginning of the next New Age (New Heaven and New Earth)

or maybe New Eon?

According to Saint Wickë...


"The largest defined unit of time is the supereon, composed of eons.
Eons are divided into eras, which are in turn divided into periods, epochs and ages. "


Then again, Saints are not infallible in everything that they may say or do to day.

+++

 

What's this? You're quoting 4Horsemen and addressing moi?

Technically speaking, the Bible only brings us to the end of the Age of Pisces, which is now, actually. This is the dawning of the Age of Aquarius - my age!!

 

Technically speaking?

In Truth, In very Truth, Death shall be buried forever...

 

Prominent people and experts have reputation to hold, why would they risk their reputation and prestige to even talk about UFOs if they weren't serious and believe it?

Bill Clinton was the president of United State of America, he wouldn't dare even make such joke if he wasn't serious about that two issues.

 

There are plenty of evidences. The UFOs keep flying in our sky, have been shown on the internet, news networks thousand times. They are real.

Open your eyes!!!!

 

Lights in the sky =/= UFO's.

 

The ancient Hebrew language did not have a word for "sphere." The only word they had for round shape like a 3D ball is Circle! They just didn't have the right and exact word for sphere.

I also found another scriptures that describe the earth in our modern understanding:

Job 26:7 "He stretches out the north over empty space And hangs the earth on nothing." ~ Job understood the idea that the earth is suspended in space.

Job 26:10 "He described a circle upon the face of the waters, until the day and night come to an end." ~ Job also understood the movement of the sun and moon in circular patterns.

While it is assumed that the Greeks were the first to suggest this idea, the fact is the book of Job written over 1,500 years before Eratosthenes of Alexandria was born contains the exact same information.

It was in fact a small handful of scholars not associated with the Christian church who began that inaccuracy nearly 300 years after the life of Christ.

 

It's just a book, get over it. Actually, a book that you lot never even bothered to give a proper title. ("Bible" is a misspelling of "biblia," which is simply Latin for "book." Calling it "the bible" is just calling it "the book" in very bad Latin.)

No other book covers all of history? I take it you've never read The Silmarillion, Dianetics, or heck, just about anything by James a Michener then. For that matter, "from the very beginning" seems like a tad of an exaggeration. My understanding is that the Christians' book covers about the last 6,000 years or so. Modern humans appeared about 200,000 years ago, so that would make it about 3% of human history. Of course, the universe itself originated in the big Bang about 13.7 billion years ago, which would reduce your book to 0.00000044% of the history of the universe.

 

It's a rough timeline for Jews and early Christians. Beyond that, no.

By the way, the "finish" hasn't been confirmed, nor has the "start."

 

Since none of the Christians ever came back with proof to back up the claims about the Chinese and Australian aborigines being in the Bible, I'm going to call that claim debunked.

Just more Christians doing some Lying for Jesus.

 

go back and read, I debunked that 5 pages ago..lol

 

So where is the start of mankind's existence? some use the Big Bang but that's nonsense.

what other literature on the planet can pinpoint how we got here better than the Bible?

 

What is this suppose to mean?

Proof has already been exposed that UFO's exist and have visited this planet before.


This is why the lying notion of the Big Bang is such nonsense. for if UFO's are indeed real, they definitely didn't come from a Big Bang either.

 

Dianetics?...hahahaha...such a crap book. based on the Bible. how come? it's trash and not even worth discussing in this context of factual books.

 

You made claims and I asked for evidence that you never provided.

Since you can't provide, I can only assume that you are Lying for Jesus.

 

That does not logically follow at all.

 

Is this^ the logic of people that are in denial. "show me proof first?"

I hear this a lot when people deny the Bible as well.

Fact is, the Bible is a real book and UFO's are real too.

These things have proven over time to accurate.

If the Bible was trash and fiction, Governments would've banned them as lies a long time ago.

and if UFO's were fake, then the crop cricles are man-made. which any idiot knows they are not man-made with planks and rope.

 

If I wanted to create a quote book made up of your quotes would you be upset?

 

So wait...

Because the government hasn't banned the Bible...it must be true?

So I guess you believe that the Quran is true, that Greek myths are true, and that Narnia is a real place, don't you?

 

Take it easy, Questerr. This person just described the Big Bang as lying nonsense. You shouldn't pick on people who obviously can't defend themselves.

 

Exactly. if people are deeming it fact when it's not, shouldn't the book be in the fiction section of the Barnes and Noble? ask yourself. WHY is the book in the religious section of every bookstore and library???????? you have to connnect the mental dots to see what I'm saying here.

Greek myths tell on themselves, "myths" but you have a lot of people that think that stuff really happend..

 

So you are basically saying every book that appears in the religion section in Barnes and Nobel is the truth.

Fail.

So then those myths must be true too.

Fail.

 

But you must agree that the Quran, the Bhagavad Gita, the I Ching, and Wiccaism must be true because their books are in the religion section too, correct?

By the way, the Greeks did not call their own stories "myths".