Another one who when the are wrong simply turns on the poster and try's to discredit them. Now do tell how I can give you the article I did without looking it up moron?
To play your game, no, all you have is biased testimony from promoters of the John Adams-myth. Got any unbiased evidence? See how that works?
It does not work at all. We have first party testimony, documents in his hand writing and good historical records, we have his signature on important documents, we have paintings done at the time of him, property records and so much more. It really is very sad if you are unable to comprehend the difference between a figure like John Adams and something like your Jesus who is much like King Arthur or Robin Hood.
So what do you have. and please don't say in the bible. It was written long after his death by people who never met him. And LOLOL Google is not an answer.
So here is Richard Carrier one of the main detractors of the Jesus myth, Not much doubt he exists, now how about you providing the evidence that the hippy on a stick existed?
So you have no answer for the statement you made, so you try to put it on someone else by calling them names. Nobody cares what atheists believe or don't believe. That has nothing to do with what you claimed.
I have no need for statements of what I believe about atheism. I know that atheists can't prove that deity does not exist. The arguments for atheism are as silly as the hatred to Islam.
LOLOL Nobody is making arguments for, or against atheism. We are waiting for your proof that Jesus exists.
No reason an atheist would want to prove a deity does not exist, if you believe one does show some evidence, but you do not and cannot. So not only do you not understand what atheism is you make false claims about them.
I know that the evidence supports the existence, that it laughs at atheism, and who cares about Islam other than will it outgrow its violence.
That was really d--b. I never made any claims. You made claims. You said you have evidence for Jesus. we asked you to show your evidence. You made every excuse you could, and still have not shown the evidence.
All I claimed is that you made a statement and refused to back it up. Even refused to admit you could not back it up.
Which deity? Atheists don't have to prove or disprove existence of deities. Throughout history believers did a pretty good job of disproving deities' existence - their own deities - by changing their religion. Funny enough, none of the dead and forgotten deities ever came back to reclaim the throne. I don't have proof that five legged giant talking mushrooms don't exist. Does that mean they exist?
Does not matter which deity? Atheists have neither the symbols, logic, or language to disprove the existence of deity. Your fallacy of false equivalency is cute.
Because they do not need to, it is like being asked to prove the Lochness Monster or Bigfoot does not exist. YOU make the claim about your hippy on a stick, provide the evidence or shut the **** up!
That is a fallacy of kind not degree. I said there is more documentation that he lived than there is for you, not that he is God. But, yeah, I believe that. That's no problem to me but will be for you, ese.