It’s Official: Democrats Are Performing Better After The Abortion Ruling

The way democrats fund their MAGA opponents it wouldn’t surprise me at all they’re happy at a minimum and possibly funding anti abortionists just to help with elections.

 

Abortion is a personal issue. It should be left to the woman. No one has the right to say what they can do. If a woman wants to abort her child, so be it.

Midterms generally are a boon for the opposition party, but Republicans blew it.

 

synonyms do not mean one means EXACTLY the same as the other.

It means approximately.

And I am making a distinction. But I could do the same for the word 'Hate".

IN fact, I do not even need to introduce the synonym, or any synomym.

There is the kind of hate that is blind, for no good reason, that kind of hate is a crime.

And there is a kind of hate that is just, for a good reason, based on facts, based on observation.

One could hate one's uncle because he is a terrorist. Taht isn't blind hatred, that kind of hatred is NOT crime.

One could hate one's neighbor because he is gay, for no reason at all, that kind of hatred is blind, that kind of hatred is a crime, if it's acted upon. If it isn't acted upon and merely felt, it's called 'bigotry'.

So, there are two kinds of hatred.

But rather than over burden right wing simplistic brains, I chose to call the hatred that is just, as reasonable, logical, as 'loathing'.

But, apparently even that won't work for a simplistic mind.

If you can't fathom such a simple thing, I can't help you.

 

Snotloller name one centrist thing he’s done.

 

I’m actually happy I hope the Dems keep their slight majority after the midterms. Because the only possible hope they have of winning in 2024 is if they lose in the midterms and can blame everything on the republicans. If they can’t do that, they’re screwed come 2024 because they’re incapable of governing.

 

Spontaneous abortions, almost every woman has many during their lifetimes.... also known as miscarriages

looks like it's you trying to change the definition of words

 

no one is killed

but some do want to force rape victims to have their rapists babies... sick

 

I never said he was a centrist.

 

Your post says “he has governed from the center”.

So I’ll ask again. Can you name one centrist policy he has pushed? Cause I don’t think you can name even one… certainly not enough to make the argument that he has “governed from the center”.

 

Of course someone is killed. Once again you have to try and change our language and ignore what happens in an abortion even up to the moment of birth.
I asked you first, and already addressed your question now address mine.

Do you believe the moment before a baby who was the product of a rape is about to be born the mother should be able to decide to kill it instead? Do you put that human LIFE below your concerns for the mothers FEELINGS?

 

Yes I know how the pro-abortion side must change the meanings of words to better accept what you support. Abortion is an elective medical procedure that purposely kills the unborn baby.

 

Actually there are several more forms of hatred but then the simplistic mind might only not be equipped to comprehend more than two or that loathing could be just as blind as hatred.

Glad to have been able to help you.

 

A "compromise" and only then? Why do you need a compromise to ban the killing of a baby the moment before it is born?

 

Because there are those against abortion who would be happy with a complete ban on the procedure altogether. Compromise is essential.

Speaking hypothetically, if there was a policy that banned abortion after say 15-20 weeks, leaving open exceptions for the health of the mother or the discovery of birth defects after the cutoff, I'd be okay with it. In a perfect world women could regulate themselves and have or not have abortions as each saw fit, but you gotta work with the world you have.

 

LOL...it's the Repub's who can't govern chit.

Keeping in mind your track record on this forum, I don't think you can even predict tomorrow's weather with any degree of certainty.

 

nope, it's you trying to change the language

 

you're the one trying to change the definitions of words though, and no, abortion is not murder

 

I don't really understand what level of ignorance it takes, or what degree of fanaticism it takes, to believe that every conception will result in a birth, even without outside interference. Miscarriages are quite common in the human species, and these laws are forcing women to carry dead babies. Why not sue God for causing these miscarriages in the first place? At least the idiotic philosophy espoused by some here would match that idea.

 

Is that the dead canary? We shall find out soon

 

Didn't the RNC tell Trump the would quit paying his legal bills if he decided officially to run before the midterms?

 

I didn't say that, the article I quoted did. Even if he isn't, your harping on it is a red herring. The accomplishments listed in the post are the point.

You sift through a bowl of cherries and manage to find a pit, and then argue the bowl is about pits.

Try that trick somewhere else.

 

Exactly. And democrats are doing EVERYTHING to get him to get him to announce. I was just about to open a thread commenting on that.

 

I'm a atheist and a miscarriage is not an elective medical abortion. Try again and actually respond to what I asked.

Why do you need a compromise to ban the killing of a baby the moment before it is born?

 

I believe their rules or FEC regulations would require it.

 

Since I didn't say abortion is murder no I am not trying to change the definition of words. Murder is something codified in our laws and statutes and it is not defined as an abortion.

You got anything true to say instead of just making things up?