Come on use common sense. What good does a gun in your purse do. I guess I should’ve said to him, “wait don’t move I have to go to my purse and get my gun so I can shoot you” and yesI’m going to walk down the street with a hand on a gun. Women who have guns usually end up being victimized by them because men are usually stronger and can just pull the gun away from them.
1. The Internet gets the message out there, but society is changing and MGTOW is part of that and yes I support the message unless you happen to be an Alpha or Beta man in society who has the means and resources to attract women many of whom are getting more picky as to mates. 2. Not true just intimate relationships in cases where its unfair to the man. 3. No more than radical feminism, and hello these men used to be called 'confirmed bachelors'. 4. Of course see if young men don't see a good future they are going to consider that path the ordinary one not practical anymore and choose something else, college doesn't assure a good job with a future so its not attractive to go as opposed to other cheaper options. 5. I'm not so sure I have a nice life and if I want sex. there is pornography and my hand OR I can hire a prostitute OR enjoy phone sex OR sex cam sex so there are commercial sex options look at Japan if one wants sex find an outlet and all are cheaper than a relationship with a woman and possibly being stuck with a kid one doesn't want.
You are wrong. Talk to Nancy Bittle of A.W.A.R.E . I have trained many Women, Detectives, U.C. ops, and civilians in concealed carry, and successful as far as defending themselves from attack. This whole they will take the gun away from you is an Anti Gun farce, take classes in Martial Arts too as well as defensive gun classes. No purse carry, you wear a holster on your belt, and a sports jacket to conceal it from common view.
Do as you wish. Women are very successful using guns especially handguns to protect themselves. And I know this first-hand. Women were my best students and many went on to become competitive shooters surpassing me in every way.
What macho nothing. Women excel at shooting, it has absolutely nothing to do with macho B.S. if anything, so called macho crap slows the learning curve.
I just love your suggestion that women should carry guns. What is this the wild west? The problem is we shouldn’t have to
A gun is no garantee that you won't be victimized if you leave it in your purse just leave it at home. But a gun is a tactical advantage. If it wasn't criminals and militaries wouldn't use them. It requires the proper attitude and skill. Keeping it in your purse is foolish. Keeping it on your person is much wiser.
I agree you shouldn't have to. We shouldn't have to lock our doors or be weary of strangers. But sadly there are people who mean others harm. And a tactical advantage is what it is. There are people that steal attack and rape others. And because of them self defense can be handy. I believe in empowering women to not need to rely on utopias or men to protect them. Women even being physically weaker are perfectly capable of defending themselves or at least trying.
People don't need many things. The military carries machine guns. A so-called assault rifle which is just a rifle like any other rifle is not a machine gun. It's a semi-automatic rifle just like what people would hunt with with a few odds and ends added to it it doesn't change the way it shoots or its lethality.
I would have to disagree with you on number two. I don't think they seek to cease all relationships where the woman has the upper hand it seems like they just personally opted out. Which shouldn't be a problem for anybody it's your choice whether you want to be in a relationship or not. You are the best Arbiter of whether or not you can handle it. I think the reason we see such anger and vitriol toward it is due to insecurity. Men going their own way has been a thing since there were men. The concept of a hermit or monks or priests or men who just don't get married is nothing new.
True but clergy and hermits were institutional and women did have the same options in the case of Priests and Hermits called Nuns and Anchoresses however it does seem at time bachelors were big targets. Rome had laws where it was a big benefit to marry and pressures were there. Around the turn of the century America they also had movement by women to target bachelor men with dubious results. However MGTOW might be different go look at Japan around 40% of men and women of child bearing age are marrying and/or reproducing and still its often below a value to bolster the population if each of these couples have one baby there is no long term benefit, two babies they replace themselves as population goes it would take each having five children to see growth and big families there aren't the norm. The rest of the men are opting out of relationships that would lead to possible mating and women are opting for careers and seem to both use commercial options for sexual needs. If this does expand to all major first world nations and immigration isn't an option many countries are going to be in trouble. Either they risk losing their national historic identity as immigrants change things or they will lose population overall its not seeming to me something governments want. I in not humor said to a Japanese man with government ties in his nation just offer a lot of cash per healthy child and pay women to be mothers, say, in US funds $100k for the first child then $200k for the second and on the fifth or more children go to $500k each and women will opt for that. I was serious. Make having babies a career choice and cover them with day care, education, a home, a stipend for each child's expenses and such for the children and a nanny or governess take all the issues with raising them away. I don't see they have many other options if the nation wants to survive unless they open up their borders to immigrants.
well these options for women that have honestly always existed as well did not interfere with the options for men. Basically put a woman going her own way and no way interferes or even contradicts a man going his own way. well I don't think governments really have any saying that unless they force the population to have children. And I don't think mgtow in and of itself poses any serious threat like I said that's always been a thing. I think population decline and the US has much more to do with abortion. so they're going to take more money in the form of taxes to pay women to have children seems like a failing system to me.
What a bunch of crock. I had this female cop was so scared of me she was shaking. I had a bad day and I was pissed. I can assure you practically frozen. I don't go on attacking women for nothing but I did have to defend myself from a woman who tried to stab me and my step mother. All I can say is that I kicked her pretty good but she was so highly on drugs she barely felt anything.
With the #Metoo garbage now men are not going to companies parties if there is one. Only a few married men go. Men had enough. Also men will not meet women one on one anymore without another woman. Quite a few men have stated they will not hire women any longer. Men deal with this crap and MGTOW is growing even more with the #metoo crap.
Its so funny until men lose promotions and other access from being alienated by the SJW led political correctness police then either more men will opt out, or go and not deal with women in business risking the lawsuits or ,I so hope, sue for making the place of employment an unfair and biased work environment for men using the 14th Amendment and all those wonderful equal rights and protections women wanted in place based on gender.
Let’s do away with the political correctness stuff and let your male,boss grab your balls.... By the way they said the same thing about women in business when anti-discrimination laws came into practice. They said the same thing with the woman’s movement that that would be too many lawsuits. Now the medical schools are half women, now law schools are half women, and women have more power now than they did. I guess using your logic they will only hire women with undesirable asses to pinch
Fine, agreed, but don't expect men to stay either they will fight and you don't know competition when men go on the path to crush rivals or they will go and just not want to be around women and change their whole outlook. I for one am seeing more and more men young and older just deciding its not worth it if a man is single he can do a lower wage job and live okay so why bother with college or trying so hard? Why try and that is key MGTOW is doing its own thing and its not the home, picket fence, wife, children, a pet dog or cat and a stable career its I'll work part time in Walmart and share the rent with a male buddy and enjoy my hobbies and interests and not bother with women its a distraction. Its not good for women to the pool of men worth and willing to marry will be smaller and smaller and smaller then what women are glad to marry equals and love trading up however trading down not so much. This is key the woman's ,power of the p***y, is dying slowly and without that men don't care we love our sisters and mothers and are good men but just don't care to deal with the BS having women do deal with in personal sexual relationships. Feminism created MGTOW and your gender should be scared in a century or so I predict only 33% of people will reproduce the top men and women the most successful and educated or close to it and the rest it will be out of fashion. Marriage is dying now and its going to get worse. This isn't a war Renee its a disengagement and that will be mimicked by women not as desirable as partners who aren't beautiful, or brilliant or successful and who have careers to compare with matching women.
It’s obvious feminism created MGTOW...it’s a bunch of threatened men who need to blame women for their lack of success. More and more women are opting not to marry...and you’re right . Women Have traditionally married men who are their equal or better while men have married their equal or less. Now that women are becoming educated they will not settle for less, but who knows maybe that will change. Women do not need to marry as they did years ago. Women used to get married at 19 and 20th and now if they get married often in the 30s and 40s. Remember women can have babies if they want and don’t need a husband. And most marriages the men need the wives more than the wives need them unless they are financially dependent
