MOON LANDINGS 'FAKE': Shock video shows 'Stanley Kubrick' admit historic event was 'H

Discussion in 'Moon Landing' started by Destroyer of illusions, Dec 12, 2015.

  1. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,262
    Likes Received:
    421
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Debunking The Apollo Moon Hoax (debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com)

    11. Never mind that - look over here: When this hopeless individual has exhausted his inept repertoire of responses comes his most used spam. He resorts to spamming his wall of crap and ignoring the main issue!

    "Anyway, there's a ton of proof that the missions were faked and zero proof that they were real."

    What a sad, sad liar this person is. They have been humiliated completely on dozens of subjects, thousands of times on Apollo, yet they spew this cut and paste hogwash almost every time.

    James Van Allen:-

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2021
  2. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    4,165
    Likes Received:
    541
    Trophy Points:
    113
  3. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,262
    Likes Received:
    421
    Trophy Points:
    83
    This article has of course been authenticated huh? He didn't change his mind at all! He is a scientist, he takes data and evolves his position accordingly.

    What a colossal inventor of hogwash you are. If the evidence doesn't fit your spammed claims you invent a new one.

    Debunking The Apollo Moon Hoax (debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com)

    6. Credibility Test: "This calls for a credibility test. XXXXXXX maintains that the Chinese spacewalk was real and not faked in a water tank. Do you agree with him?

    This is where the spammer uses one of his pre-determined idiotic conspiracies or erroneous claims as the yardstick for a credibility test. He is the arbitrator of its provenance therefore anyone who disagrees with it can now be referred to as "discredited" and all their rebuttal can be ignored.

    Pathetic spammer.

    This person has been doing all of the above across 100's of forums for (best guess) coming up to 19 years. He cuts and pastes duplicate posts, responses, key phrases and dismissal videos. He determines any one or more of the above and posts them out, then slams a huge post with repeated and debunked bullshit. There is simply no level of response that can get through to somebody who has terminal Dunning and Kruger syndrome.

    Imagine somebody who is a layman and very ignorant in every subject relating to space travel. Then incorporate his total ignorance on virtually every branch of science and engineering.

    Now wonder to yourself how this clown has the audacity to assess ANYONE's credibility, when he himself is one of the most dishonest, evasive and deeply disturbed individuals online.
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2021
  4. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    4,165
    Likes Received:
    541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    More on space radiation...

    Nasa Telling Us We Have Only Accomplished Low Earth Orbit | 2016
     
  5. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    4,165
    Likes Received:
    541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I was reading the comment section of the above video and I found this.

    It looks to me like a current of air from an air vent somewhere is blowing the paper. It seems to want to go down and the air current is keeping it up.
     
  6. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,262
    Likes Received:
    421
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Pathetic. The last sections are talking about the circuitry. It is much smaller and more susceptible to charged particles.

    Debunking The Apollo Moon Hoax (debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com)

    11. Never mind that - look over here: When this hopeless individual has exhausted his inept repertoire of responses comes his most used spam. He resorts to spamming his wall of crap and ignoring the main issue!

    "Anyway, there's a ton of proof that the missions were faked and zero proof that they were real."

    What a sad, sad liar this person is. They have been humiliated completely on dozens of subjects, thousands of times on Apollo, yet they spew this cut and paste hogwash almost every time.
     
  7. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    27,767
    Likes Received:
    29,211
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This is true in the same way that every shark attack in the world has been staged by Steven Spielberg.

    Why not post the ACTUAL interview rather than just a transcript?
     
  8. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,262
    Likes Received:
    421
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Forget it. It isn't Kubrick - hoaxes made by Moon hoax liars are acceptable for them!
     
  9. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,262
    Likes Received:
    421
    Trophy Points:
    83
    The problem is where you type "It looks to me"! It is an air vent circulation plastic director. Stops the vents blowing "down" into the areas where they work. Moronic and ignorant observation by you - as always.
     
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2021
  10. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    4,165
    Likes Received:
    541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That might turn out to be true. "It looks to me" shows that I haven't commited myself and I'm not sure. If I'd said, "That's obviously a piece of paper being blown by air", I would have deserved derision.

    I'm still not sure. How can we verify it? You seem to expect the viewers to simply take your word for it. That merits dirision.
     
  11. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,262
    Likes Received:
    421
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Meh!! You have absolutely committed yourself. It's in your limited nature. Do you think I ever expect someone like you to do something honest and concede? You never have and never will. You are the opposite of a truth seeker. You have no objectivity.

    If it's woo you believe it. Pathetic.
     
  12. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    4,165
    Likes Received:
    541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This statement would get you laughed out of the debating hall. You're not using the scientific method. The movement looks consistent with a newspaper being blown by an air current on Earth. Instead of addressing the issue, you insulted the person who raised the issue.
     
  13. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,262
    Likes Received:
    421
    Trophy Points:
    83
    You're like a robot cut and paste machine. EVERY single thing you type is from your idiotic, used a thousand times manual.

    Debunking The Apollo Moon Hoax (debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com)

    9. Idiotic Closes: "You'd get laughed out of the debating hall ..." or "you're about as impressive as the Black Knight in this video"

    The sheer irony of this is always lost on him. If ever there was somebody who behaved like the Black Knight - as his arm gets chopped off it's a "moot point" it would be this serial forum spammer. There is not a debating environment on this planet where this person would show up to. He knows more than anyone that he would get the floor wiped with his drivel.

    So YOUR "scientific method" is your ignorant layman observation? It looks NOTHING like a newspaper - it is white, it has no business being anywhere in that picture, an air duct would blow it AWAY from it. If it were in gravity how the hell does a white newspaper fly up to the top corner?

    As I said, you are already committed to your useless opinion. No amount of logic or reason will change that ignorant viewpoint.
     
  14. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    17,513
    Likes Received:
    2,876
    Trophy Points:
    113
  15. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    17,513
    Likes Received:
    2,876
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is youn who allways and consistently ignores sceicne and no the movement is NOT consistent with newspaper being blown by air as any third grader would know by watching.'

    This is why you are a laughing stock and have been pwnedand crushed with every post.

    You would not be ALLOWED in a debating hall. You do not debate you repeat proven lies.
     
  16. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    4,165
    Likes Received:
    541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't have a foregone conclusion. I just want to figure out what's happening. If I see an anomaly, I want to have a discussion with objective people.

    I was referring to the size and movement. I knew it wasn't a newspaper. There seems to be an up and a down. It seems to want to go down and the air is keeping it up. It looks exactly like the way a newspaper would behave if it were hanging and air was blowing past it.

    I've looked at it more closely and I see that there are a bunch of them attached to the ceiling and some of them are loose. Slightly below and behind it there's something that looks like a vent that blows air. I might be wrong but it looks like the air is coming from there and it's blowing the paper-like object. It looks to me like it's in gravity and the air from that vent is making it move. It looks like it wants to go down the way it would in gravity but the air from the vent is blowing it back up.
     
  17. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    17,513
    Likes Received:
    2,876
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That is an outright lie from you.

    Your misuse and dishonest claim to have shown crushing proof is in fact evidence of a foregone conclusion. Your circular reasoning and use of standards which actually apply more to your own argument and debunks your own arguments prove you have a forgone conclusion.

    Your false and oft repeated claim that anomolies PROVE the landings were a hoax is proof you have a forgone conclusion and do not weich to have any sort of objectivity much less an objective discussion.

    Every claim you have made has been massively crushed with hardcore evidence which you cannot challenge or refute. Yet you still continue.

    There was no ceiling and no air period.
     
  18. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    4,165
    Likes Received:
    541
    Trophy Points:
    113
  19. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,262
    Likes Received:
    421
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Spam. After your pathetic performance at Avalon I don't expect your ignorance to be able to come to any reason.

    That isn't an anomaly and neither are any of the ones in your idiotic claims. If I get time and the moderator doesn't close it for ludicrous spam, I shall show you why you are a gullible fool.
     
  20. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    4,165
    Likes Received:
    541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Start now. Don't wait.
     
  21. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,262
    Likes Received:
    421
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I already started at Avalon and you were too stupid to acknowledge any of it. I'll get around to it.
     
  22. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    4,165
    Likes Received:
    541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The viewers can judge for themselves.
    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sh...-that-the-International-Space-Station-is-fake

    This must be a pretty sensitive issue because the moderator gave a very lame excuse for closing the thread. There was no reason to close that thread except for pressure or instructions from above.
     
  23. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    17,513
    Likes Received:
    2,876
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes they can and all of them judge you to posting foolish lies which have been crushed.
     
  24. Betamax101

    Betamax101 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,262
    Likes Received:
    421
    Trophy Points:
    83
    The imaginary "viewers" who never agree with your stupid and gullible claims?

    I was censored too or doesn't that count! You are always bitchin' about how you are the wounded party, but every thread you get banned in is usually where you are getting your sorry ass kicked, just like this one.
     
  25. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    4,165
    Likes Received:
    541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As I said, the viewers can judge for themselves.

    You've destroyed your credibility several times. Anyone who looks at these cases closely can see that so your ranting isn't going to affect those who look at these cases closely.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...anding-is-fake.553296/page-11#post-1072198469
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...anding-is-fake.553296/page-11#post-1072198980

    You've said such lame things that I doubt many viewers take you seriously.
     

Share This Page