Over 60% of US voters say Russia is enemy – poll

Well thanks for sharing your feelings.

 

Of course, lock-step denial without even bothering to read what you asked for. That, old chap, is what we in Britain call being dishonest. Or cowardly; not wanting to know the truth. The word I prefer is 'pathetic'.

 

I 'asked 'for' your input on Pol Pot? Where?

What is it about leftists that makes them so needful of remedial reading?? Or is leftism the reason why Johnny can't read?

 

I supplied you with three (3) links in support of my statement. Are you incapable of reading for yourself? I'm not here to hold your hand. And you say you're not stupid?
http://thirdworldtraveler.com/US_ThirdWorld/US_PolPot.html

 

As I will document on Tuesday with copy and paste, the United states created and maintained a system of terror in much of third world until the invention of free trade agreements, which serve the same purpose - protecting the climate for investment against "the popular demands for immediate improvement in the low living standards of the masses of the population."

 

Warmongering is not quite the word for our involvement (yours and ours, and Europe's, among others) in the Middle East in particular, where our fight is against the ******ned religiously inspired terrorism that turned parts of our country into a virtual warzone and killed thousands of people on fateful morning, and that following earlier terror attempts.

But Russian propaganda encourages the kind of negative, inaccurate thinking about it that you're displaying here.

 

I stated earlier, if Soviets had the Abomb in 45, they would've used it on Germany...in a blink!! They killed 8 million ukranians through starvation, look at Chernobyl, people getting cancers, birth abnormalities, etc.

 

Sure, yes, look at Chernobyl.

 

Thank you for your feedback.

There is no subjunctive mood in history... if.. History operates with real events and not with fictional ones. Chernobyl has nothing to do with intentional use of mass destruction weapons. Everyone knows now that it was a result of a poorly organizied expreriment .

 

No, it's far simpler. Decades of well-documented US meddling in countries where you were neither wanted nor invited, is what has bred terrorism. I'm not excluding Britain. We, the West, created the problems we are now complaining about. Iran and Operation Ajax is a perfect example of a really stupid idea which is reverberating to this day. The CIA calls it 'blow back'.

 

Look at Japan; babies still being born with genetic birth defects 70 years after the bombs.

 

It's embarrassing to me how immoral the US government is and has been, rationalizing torture and rendering here and there.

And the irony is beautiful, that in terms of honorable behavior the Russian government far outperforms the US government. Putin seeks peace and progress, POTUS seeks confrontation and war.

 

True, look at Chernobyl also.

 

Seeks peace? Outperforms? Like in eastern Ukraine, georgia, syria? LOL.

 

What was done was done, unfortunately, it brought a quick end to the war, whereas the famine was meant to destroy an entire civilization.

 

I'll be counting the moments.

 

Gee, if only they hadn't of attacked Pearl Harbor maybe none of this would have happened. Consequences can be a bitch.

 

The Russians were clearly just seeking peace in the Ukraine and Crimea, has large parts of eastern Europe nervous, while the US has expanded its territories into....somewhere.

 

Maybe try researching it or looking at my previous threads.

 

Yeah, I'll get right on it.

 

AND compere what USA did to Nagasaki-HIROSHIMA/Japan and what Muscovites did to Belarus/Ukraine

 

You don't know where to look, probably. And the right-wing insists that the media is liberal. If that were true this history would be common knowledge. See you tommorow.

 

Isn't it strange we were never told about Ukraine invading and annexing Crimea in 1996... and why wasn't there an uproar by our government at the time? And why wasn't Ukraine sanctioned?

When the Crimean people declared their independence again, and this time asked the Russian soldiers to protect them from another invasion by Ukraine so they could unite with Russia, they were sanctioned immediately. Why?

Under the Crimean Constitution of 1992, Crimea existed as a legal, democratic, secular state. Crimea’s relationship with Ukraine was based on bilateral agreements. In 1995 Ukrainian special ops forces and Ukrainian Army troops invaded Crimea and annexed the territory.

The Autonomous Republic of Crimea was established by the 1991 All-Union Referendum in which 94% of Crimeans voted in favor of re-establishing their status as an autonomous republic. Crimeans repeated the vote in 2014 by an even higher percentage, and this time prevented another Ukrainian invasion by reuniting with Russia.
​

Also why isn't there an uproar about the apartheid system in Estonia as there was in South Africa? Instead Nato deliberately affronted the Russians suffering under that system by marching its forces through the area the Russians live in.

Another thing, why aren't we upset about Poroshenko attacking and killing his own people in the Donbas? Weren't we the ones that were screaming about Assad committing the 'alleged' attacks on his own people in Syria?

As for the so called invasion of Ukraine, didn't the German Intelligence agents report General Breedlove as being delusional when he said he saw a Russian invasion that no one else could see?

 

And there is no way in hell Hilary is going to lose the election.

 

People like to think of the Russian Federation as being the same as the Soviet Union, but it's not. It's as different from the past as Nazi Germany is to the Germany of today.

We on the other hand are now what the Soviet Union was. We have it all; the media brainwashing, imposed atheism and attacks on Christianity, a government run by globalist ideologues with an indifference toward human lives, etc.