Parts of U.S. set for record low temperatures

I never said otherwise Mr. Strawman.

 

There have been polar vortex conditions in the past though the effects tend to concentrate east of the Rocky Mts. Looks like more rain for California this week.

 

The prattle you engaged suggests you dont know about the deforestation thats going on in third world countries like brazil

 

I wonder how the canucks are doing?

 

Today's forecast max in Chicago is -13F [wow] but in the 40's by this weekend

 

Hold on to your hat.
It's gonna be -50 tomorrow morning in Chicago. And... hold on to your hat once again.. 48 on Sunday.
Talking about climate change.

 

Yes its SUMMER in the southern hemisphere.

Perhaps that is why people don't pay much attention to your opinions.

 

Nothing I said implied anything of the sort. You must be confusing me with another poster or have serious reading comprehension issues.

 

Good thing that the Super bowl is being played in Atlanta rather than Chicago if these cold conditions were to last into the weekend. Of-course Mercedes-Benz stadium is covered anyway.

 

So then you can’t help but be a charicature, got it.

 

The only charicature is in your twisted imagination

 

Yeah that's pretty much how it happens with companies like Weyerhauser and others in the US who provide lumber products. They plant many more trees than they harvest. Even still the wackos don't want them to do that. The wackos live in houses built with wood produced by American forest products companies and object to how they product their products...they want them to just let the forests grow naturally and return to wilderness.

 

Ironic, isn't it, that just a few days ago a "climate change" hoaxer was testifying in Minnesota that Duluth Minnesota would never again see temperatures below 10 degrees F. http://www.startribune.com/u-scient...he-nation-s-fastest-warming-states/504398862/

So, yeah, we should really put our lives and our money in the hands of the "scientists" and hoaxers who keep telling us how bad things will be 100 years from now when they are wrong about events just a couple of weeks in the future.

 

The true science deniers are those that ignore any science that is inconvenient to the current dogma which resembles mass hysteria.

 

You said "climate is not political". HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAAHAHHAHAHAAHAH.

"Grade school science". Science is pretty much confirmed by experimentation, As Prof. Richard Feynman said, if the experiment does not confirm the theory, the theory is wrong. We have had over 30 years of the climate hoaxers telling us over and over that if we don't give them all our money and control over our lives we are DOOOOOMMMEEDDDD!!!!!. Yet, their 5 year time lines, 10 year time lines go by and NASA atmospheric data show minimal or no warming. The Himalyan glaciers haven't melted. There are more polar bears than ever. There arent flooded streets in Miami, the Arctic isn't free of ice in 2014 as Al Gore and other climate hoaxers predicted.

So, yes, I deny belief in a total complete absolute hoax driven by global redistributionists and politicized "scientists". Because I AM educated and not subject to the ministrations of climate religionists telling me to believe their proclamations without evidence confirming their computer model driven theories. (Look up the term GIGO)

 

Says the guy so disinterested in the existence of other parts of the world that he forgot the Southern Hemisphere experiences summer while we experience winter.

 

I hear most of Australia is in danger of becoming almost desert-like.

 

I hears it was sooo cold, politicians had their hands in their own pockets!

 

Are they scientists?

I will give you the same challenge I give every “sceptic”

Read the IPCC sythesis report and get back to me with an analysis of where the science is in error

 

Knock yourself out



http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/change/#tabs=Tracker&tracker=trend-maps

The BOM has lots of that there science stuff

 

Do not confuse good science with poor journalism

 

Why just 50 years ago Australia was covered in lush foliage.

 

That is part of the globe no?

How are we going to stop places like Brazil from cutting down trees?

I suppose we could try getting every country in the world to sign an agreement in some city like Paris........

 

Didn’t read the link did you?

 

Well there's not much to read on an interactive chart.

I'm willing to bet you didn't look at your source in any detail, especially when you look at the 1980 - present graph that shows the upper half of Australia rapidly cooling.