Please cite your best evidence of "no-planes"

Discussion in '9/11' started by LogicallyYours, Dec 11, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,784
    Likes Received:
    363
    Trophy Points:
    83
    LMAO!

    electrical energy and electricity do not have the same meaning. now we have 2 of them that get the LMAO award!
     
  2. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,784
    Likes Received:
    363
    Trophy Points:
    83
    debunked?

    Now thats a stretch and here is your chance to post all that incontravertible debunking you think you have, so put Mr wrong up and lets go.

    The burden of proof is on the agency proffering the faked fraudulent reports and anyone who steps in their place disseminating the same false information.

    >>>MOD EDIT: INSULTS<<<

    [​IMG]

    where are all your pals that you claim seen the plane impact the building?

    Why havent any debunkers collected the cash?

    You dont even answer the challenges much less prove anything then come out claiming everything has been debunked!!! Yeh its been debunked alright! by truthers!


    [​IMG]


    pretty tough to claim a win when all that cash is just sitting there waiting for ANYONE who can provide a legitimate original plane impact video.
     
  3. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    88,474
    Likes Received:
    20,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    From Mirriam Webster, Electricity - a form of energy that is carried through wires and is used to operate machines, lights, etc.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Yet all you have are people that were not there claim they are experts on what happened.
     
  4. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,784
    Likes Received:
    363
    Trophy Points:
    83
    ok so you are not an engineer, or at least you are not an engineer that understands the physics of electricity et al. thanks. Now we are up to 3.

    I suppose you were and you are?

    Explain why the top of the building is blown all to hell, the roof on building 7 stayed nearly intact most of the way down why did the roof on 2 get blown all to hell?


    [​IMG]
     
  5. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    88,474
    Likes Received:
    20,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Now that is funny, you show no understanding of electricity or physics.

    All I see is a collapse and no "blown to hell" that you claim. But then, you still don't understand physics.
     
  6. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Just watch, Jojo will be referring to Judy Wood next.
     
  7. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,784
    Likes Received:
    363
    Trophy Points:
    83
    do you see a building?
     
  8. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    88,474
    Likes Received:
    20,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Do you see dead people?

    Of course I see a building, one in collapse.
     
  9. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,784
    Likes Received:
    363
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I dont know about judy wood but since you want to bring it up why dont you explain why the fire extinguishers were exploding and going off on floors that had no fire?

    Since all the OSHuggers here claim to be physics experts of one fashion or another that should be very simple to figure out.

    - - - Updated - - -

    did you see the roof tip over?
     
  10. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    88,474
    Likes Received:
    20,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, that generally happens when one side weakens first.
     
  11. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,784
    Likes Received:
    363
    Trophy Points:
    83
    great thats a good start

    so now:

    [​IMG]
     
  12. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Are you saying that his refusal to insist that the didn't see a plane but an object is proof he really saw a plane, or that he's really just going along with the myth of planes?
     
  13. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    88,474
    Likes Received:
    20,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You mistake the roof for the lower outer skeleton falling outward which is obviously clear in anything but one of your gifs.
     
  14. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You have no eyewitnesses who provide plane descriptions that can match to any photo or video with markings. You'd have to provide that corroboration in the real world. No real planes or good fakes exist for debate over whether they could be real.
     
  15. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    The visual of the ball is one thing, sure, but what's even more irrefutable is the object passing east of T1 less than 2 seconds before explosion and the media acknowledging that fact, but still pretending it was a plane. That is the simple and factual stupidity you'd/they'd be covered in. The vertical black line is the ball moving between the towers.

    [​IMG]
     
  16. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have no eyewitnesses who saw martians on 9/11 either....and thats as ridiculous as the standards you're setting here

    You're still a joke with this 'no plane,orb' crap..
     
  17. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You'll always be a simpleton. The ball is a confirmed fact, filmed by the media and seen by accompanying witnesses, such as Patricia who said it looked like the size of a golfball. That one eyewitness 100% verifies the 4 news broadcasts that aired the ball.

    Patricia Ondrovic saw the ball, no doubt, and her seeing the half burnt cars proves how close she was to the towers, if not in them at some point.

    As this terrified woman was running pell-mell away from the first collapsing tower — her hair, coat and feet on fire — Ms Ondrovic witnessed vehicles parked along the street spontaneously erupt into flames.

    She even witnessed an aircraft disappear while in flight: “I saw something in the sky, it was a plane, but it was way out. It looked like it was over Jersey or something, then it wasn’t there anymore. I saw a small fireball, and it was gone. I saw two other planes. One came in one way, and the other came in the other way, and there was a plane in the middle that was way far off in the distance. Then the plane in the middle just disappeared into a little fire ball. It looked like the size of a golf ball from where I could see it. And the other two planes veered off into opposite directions. I just kept on running north.” And she’s got a lot more to say. - See more at:

    Witnesses Saw People ?Vaporized? on 9/11 « Just Wondering ? Alternative News and Opinions

    "I believe that could be a police helicopter".

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Obt-1d9POXM
     
  18. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Are you stating he knows his video was altered and is not exposing that act of fakery?
     
  19. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ondrovic was describing what SHE saw,she had already saw it was a plane 'over jersey',and she already said both towers were already burning as she was approaching them,so there was NO way she saw an 'orb' hit the second twer..

    fail
     
  20. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,111
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You guys still arguing with no planers? Why?
     
  21. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I suppose he would know it was faked.
     
  22. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You're reaching,now....
     
  23. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The why the eff is he not exposing the fact that someone added a plane to his effing video! Damn man!...you what little brain you have!
     
  24. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,784
    Likes Received:
    363
    Trophy Points:
    83
    but its more than 10 stories higher than the top of the demolition zone


    [​IMG]

    how does gravity blow the roof all to hell?
     
  25. 7forever

    7forever Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    How could Clifton Cloud have not seen a plane coming from his left (SOUTH) considering that he started filming 14-16 seconds before the second tower exploded? What excuse can you conjure up to make this impossibility somehow possible?


    "I just caught the second explosion on videotape...No, a bomb, I saw it, NO PLANE HIT NOTHIN', the building exploded from the other tower floors down."

    NIST FOIA: Clifton Cloud Clips 1-3 (WTC2 Plane Impact, 9:03am) - YouTube

    "Ya, but I don't think it was a plane." This was in response to someone on the roof, regarding the second tower, the one he witnessed.

    "No, because it happened like 20 minutes later." He's telling them that the second tower exploded 20 minutes after the first tower.

    "I think it was a bomb on the second building." He couldn't be more clear.

    "I think they had that bomb in there" (THE SECOND TOWER, the one he witnessed and recorded) and they were like alright let's maximize it. Hit it with a plane, and then hit the bomb." He's saying that he thinks they thought to hit the first tower with a plane and bomb the second one. At no time does he describe seeing a plane, that's a fact.

    "Ya, the second one I'm tellin' ya..was...I didn't see a plane...I was watching it...I didn't see a plane." He didn't see a plane because he was watching it. Just imagine trying to refute this evidence. It's unassailable.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_bttrlyx4k
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page