No there is not a record as The Jack Rubenstein of that memo was not Ruby. No one said she had a Barbiturate cocktail. She took barbiturates and drank a lot and she died in no unusual circumstances with NO signs of a struggle. But her career was in decline and her marriage was ending. Nothing to see. She is not known to have told anyone she was going to break the case wide open the only " freind " who made that claim was here hair dresser who made the claim six months after her death. In addition the claim that she was going to break it wide open meant NOTHING as she had months to do so and never tried. Now answer the question and cite one passage from the WC which is a lie and provide evidence of it being a lie
Every claim I make is accurate supported and proven by facts. However you have no support no evidence and facts to support any of your claims and have never tried. See what I mean? Your entire argument is you hate the government, you hate the government, you hate the government. In no thread or post have you EVER even TRIED to present a shred of evidence for any of the completely stupid assertions you make which are drawn from con artist you tube videos. That includes ALL of the 911 threads you respond to and it is absolute fact for all of your claims. Now cite one passage from either the warren commission or 911 report which is a lite and show evidence that it is a lie. Bitching about how much you hate the government is evidence of nothing except being a fool.
LOL! Are you that ignorant of the history of some of the basic characters in the Kennedy killing? Or do you just like to deny whatever is put in front of you? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Ruby Really, really lame and embarrassing in any case. "They reveal the presence of two additional barbiturates in Kilgallen’s system — Tuinal and Nembutal — not just the first-reported Seconal, a sleeping pill for which she had a prescription. The tests also revealed a powder residue on a glass found at her bedside, suggesting that someone opened capsules and poured drugs into her drink, Shaw writes." http://nypost.com/2016/12/04/dorothy-kilgallens-tell-all-on-a-mafia-don-might-have-got-her-killed/ "Dr. Michael Baden, who later became the city’s chief medical examiner, told a prior author, Lee Israel, that the dosage in Kilgallen’s bloodstream was the stunning equivalent of “15 to 20” 100-milligram Seconal capsules." Nobody takes that many capsules accidentally or casually. Nobody! That's handful after handful of sleeping pills.Why it's almost as if she was unconscious after having been drugged and then someone literally poured sleeping tablets and other drugs down her throat (and then destroyed all her files on the Kennedy killing). You've got everything all figured out...all except for the part about drinking a lot, the part about dying under no unusual circumstances, and her career and marriage being in decline. All of that rubbish is a slanderous lie and speculation trying to besmirch the life and death of one of America's finest journalists and that ALL her research on the Kennedy killing was taken from her residence should raise a red flag in any reasonable and moderately intelligent person....but not you, apparently. And by the way, I should have known better than believing anything you claim and withdraw my comment earlier about Kilgallen NOT personally interviewing Ruby...she actually talked to him one on one on two separate times as corroborated by Ruby's personal lawyer Melvin Beli. "Kilgallen jumped at the chance to cover the trial of Jack Ruby, the Dallas bar owner who shot Oswald in the stomach at Dallas police headquarters. She was the only reporter at the trial to interview Ruby. His lawyer, Melvin Belli, let her speak to Ruby twice" So there again we see a matter of fact where you simply are talking out of your ass! Making things up, lying, and I got it all right the first time, which is more than anyone can say for you. Simply not so as she told her lawyer, many personal friends and her employers but why should anyone be surprised that you are just making more crap up. It meant enough that someone killed her over her threat.
You just posted a wiki link which supports ME and undermines YOU,'' IT is very clear you are the one who ignores fact and is too lame to read. It does not say his name was jack rubenstein whatsoever. Once again you do the work for me and debunk yourself. Wrong boy there are no unusual circumstances surrounding her death and no evidence whatsoever that she had anything more than gossip. She NEVER had a one on one interview with Ruby her lawyer notwithstanding and this is proven beyond any question by the fact that she never visited him while he was in custody. Such visits are carefully documented. No one killed her she killed her self absolute FACT you have failed to challenge. She wrote for a long time but never found a shred of evidence of any plot to kill kennedy. Does that sound familiar? It should because it is a mirror of you. You have never presented any evidence and every attempt you have made has been crushed by me and others. Now stop evading and answer the question. Cite one passage from the warren commission which you claim is a lie and offer evidence that it is a lie
Jack Leon Ruby (born Jacob Leonard Rubenstein; March 25, 1911[1] – January 3, 1967)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Ruby Another bold faced ****ing lie and the rest gets deleted because of it (not that it had anything of value to say if your opening lie is an indicator). Why you are free to lie and ruin everything you come in contact with is a mystery to me and many other posters here.
No you are the one lying as the wiki link clearly shows. It is you lying and a coward and everyone knows it. Only a fool gives a damn about online reputation but you also lie about that as it is you and only you seen and PROVEN to be a laughing stock,' Now answer me. Cite ONE specific passage from the WC which is a lie and show evidence that it is a lie.
That's ok I'll still keep correcting your lies. You never read the WC report and so have no idea what is in it and therefore lie what you say that the reports is all lies
Actually it is not. If one cannot stand the heat...they usually leave the kitchen. I applaud your concession
It is not irrelevant. It illustrates the special treatment Mr. Oswald received from our State Department; for some reason. Again, if you can show me how many other former Americans, current Soviets and wannabe Americans received the same treatment and illustrate the number is in the thousands over that JFK era from lets say 58-63...I'll withdraw the allegation.
That's a ridiculous standard. What makes it not unusual in any way is that both sides ( the soviets and the USA ) were forth coming and explained why he was treated the way he was. Whether anyone else did the same thing or not when there is no secret it is not suspicious.
I haven't gone anywhere and aside from this one post letting you know, I am ignoring your vile insults and ignorance too. Stay gullible and uninformed.
Thanks but I never put anyone on ignore. I simply ignore posts I don't have any interest in responding to. I pick and choose what I want to respond to, regardless of author.
Good luck finding something of worth from Dr. No-bot to respond to. I'm frankly tired of blatant lies and and a total disregard for facts, but do as you will.
http://nypost.com/2017/01/29/manhattan-das-office-probing-death-of-reporter-with-possible-jfk-ties/ The case, even after 51 years, still stinks of foul play. It's good to see an attempt at getting justice done. Interesting to see who is on the side of murderers and criminals and it says much about the character of some.
True but at times I find something worthwhile to respond to with actual facts. That's important for those who want to know them. It doesn't matter to me what gibberish he tosses out, the facts speak for themselves and that's the only thing relevant. He believes his contrarian BS is convincing, who cares?
The only fact worth remembering is that you guys swear both the Warren Commission and 9/11 Reports are inaccurate. Why not quote the major inaccuracies and prove it?
I just don't like rewarding a moron by giving him the attention that he (and this other idiot troll) craves. If anyone else were interested in this issue I might agree with you but the traffic here isn't exactly busy and you are really just banging your head against a wall. I'm finished after this latest exchange over Jack Ruby and Dorthy Kilgallen.
After 51 years what stinks is the endless parade of self contradicting and increasingly lunatic theories which have no basis in any fact or reality whatsoever. You have never presented a shred of evidence and your clims have all been debunked. The Warren commission has the virtue of being supported by evidence and facts which you have never challenged
