Poll. Germany or USA - Which country has the more advanced technology

Discussion in 'Warfare / Military' started by StealthDefender, Jun 28, 2011.

?

Who is more advanced. USA or Germany?

  1. USA is more advanced

    39 vote(s)
    53.4%
  2. Both are equal

    10 vote(s)
    13.7%
  3. Germany is more advanced

    24 vote(s)
    32.9%
  1. Sadistic-Savior

    Sadistic-Savior New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    32,931
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why is that relevant? There are lots of foreiners on here and even Americans that agree with you. Sour grapes?
     
  2. Catch

    Catch Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Messages:
    8,092
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There are more pro-Americans; they think America won the Vietnam war and so forth. Why think that the poll will go any different.
     
  3. Mushroom

    Mushroom Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,554
    Likes Received:
    2,454
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Notice what he is saying. He does not care about the poll, or facts. He is simply a racist that hates Americans.

    And reading back, the posts all pretty much say the same thing. Not that the technology is superior, or that this or that is superior. His claims are all that Germans and Germany is superior, and America and Americans are inferior. No knowledge, only speaks of hatred and racism.

    Wow, nice. Pick 2 wars (hey, Germany is in Afghanistan also), then claim that proves your point.

    Well, get ready, broadside comming (one I do not believe in, but should make a point):

    Germany lost in World War I and II. US won in World War I and II.

    Germany, 0. USA. 2.

    And now for some bonus rounds: Spanish-American War, Boxer Rebellion, Panamanian Independence, Korean War, Berlin Seige, Cold War, Gulf War I, Former Yugoslavia, Gulf War II.

    Same time frame, Germany had the Boxer Rebellion, WWI, WWII, Former Yugoslavia, and Afghanistan.
     
  4. Catch

    Catch Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Messages:
    8,092
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I am an America, I'm not really a self-hater. I'm just saying that technology is based on result as per definition.

    If we go back to Post-WW2; the start of the post-modern society; then we see that in recent times, Germany has had better technology. This isn't about who had better technology when; it's about now.

    Germany is achieving all their political goals. America is not.
     
  5. Sadistic-Savior

    Sadistic-Savior New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    32,931
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Please explain why your opinion means more than theirs. Is this some kind of CPC edict that I have not heard about yet?
     
  6. Flag

    Flag New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    2,970
    Likes Received:
    67
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How is building a nuke good for germans?
    Having good education and healthcare is.
     
  7. Sadistic-Savior

    Sadistic-Savior New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    32,931
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Its a she. She's actually Chinese (I know, the flags are misleading...but she isnt European). She claims she was educated in the US.

    I personally dont think she is racist. But she is heavily biased against the US on most issues from what I have seen. Not that I have any room to throw stones...like all Neocons, I am definitely an American nationalist.


    If you look at the first few pages, you can see she is not really talking about technology at all...she goes off on this weird tangent about how it isnt the hardware that is the "real" technology, but how it is employed. Which is of course retarded. We did a back and forth over several pages where I explained to her why her definition of technology was retarded. I think she finally conceded tacitly.

    So I dont even know if she is on the same page with the rest of us on this topic. She might be talking about something else.
     
  8. Catch

    Catch Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Messages:
    8,092
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, I didn't. Why do you only use one definition of technology when it has several? I don't get that purposeful ignorance!
     
  9. Catch

    Catch Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Messages:
    8,092
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    By the way, thanks for the 'kind' words, SS. We'll be best buddies in no time!

    Though we'll have to play it cool. You have to keep up your street cred among Neo-Cons and I have to keep up mine among anti-Neo-Cons.
     
  10. Sadistic-Savior

    Sadistic-Savior New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    32,931
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Based on your posts, I do not believe you actually self-identify as American, regardless of your citizenship status. I think you self identify as a Chinese national living in America.


    That is not how most people use the word "technology". I think you misunderstand the definition.


    That is how the word is most commonly used. And that is what is meant in the context of this poll.

    Personally, I thought this was obvious.


    By that definition, all you have to do to have the best "technology" is to simply have the easiest goals. That is retarded.

    My only goal is to breathe. Therefore my technology is far superior to Germanys or the US. ta-daaa
     
  11. Catch

    Catch Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Messages:
    8,092
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Who said that's the definition and context of this thread? Why is it not the first line? The immaterial.
     
  12. Sadistic-Savior

    Sadistic-Savior New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    32,931
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have no friends on this forum. I'm here to learn, not to make friends.


    I have crossed swords with every single neocon on this forum. Usually on gay marriage or religion.
     
  13. Sadistic-Savior

    Sadistic-Savior New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    32,931
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This might help.

    Let me know if you need further clarification.
     
  14. MrHarper

    MrHarper New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Germany has certainly taken a leap backwards with this anti-nuclear shenanigans. Current government is awful... 'Christian Democratic Union' says it all.
     
  15. Sadistic-Savior

    Sadistic-Savior New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    32,931
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Everyone except you.

    In fact, you are the only one I have ever seen on here that uses that weird definition of "technology". I mean, I have not even seen that with other Chinese users. When I said "technology" they all immediately understood what I meant. You are using some obsolete 18th century version of the definition or something.
     
  16. Catch

    Catch Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Messages:
    8,092
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why is it the same FIRST line in every definition?
     
  17. Sadistic-Savior

    Sadistic-Savior New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    32,931
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Because that is the broadest version.
     
  18. Sadistic-Savior

    Sadistic-Savior New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    32,931
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I dont think Catch is trolling, but I agree I am an easy mark for Trolls. I tend to give people the benefit of the doubt.
     
  19. Catch

    Catch Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2011
    Messages:
    8,092
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I thought you were a troll at first; didn't think Neo-Cons of your magnitude existed. I was wrong. The "Bomb and destroy all non-Western democracies" wasn't a parody...
     
  20. Up On the Governor

    Up On the Governor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2010
    Messages:
    4,469
    Likes Received:
    164
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I do not report people. I could not care less how you get your jollies.
     
  21. Up On the Governor

    Up On the Governor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2010
    Messages:
    4,469
    Likes Received:
    164
    Trophy Points:
    63
    See Savior, this would be trolling as anyone that has paid attention sees the fallacy in the part in bold.
     
  22. Sadistic-Savior

    Sadistic-Savior New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    32,931
    Likes Received:
    89
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So StealthDefender, did the poll turn out as you expected? LOL
     
  23. StealthDefender

    StealthDefender New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The result should be a shame for you as you should expect 100% saying USA are more advanced. It doesn't seem that clear, even though many posters here are American.
     
  24. Rexody

    Rexody Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    330
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    18
    And nobody has even mentioned droves of German scientists taken out of Germany in 1945, experts in missiles and rocket engines together with trains of blueprints, drawings and different relevant documents that went the same road.

    Wasn'it that a real pusher to boost the US after war technological edge?

    There's no tech relation between the US Army power and the Victory in the WW1 won by the French Army who bore the brunt of the war. What was the tech edge of the US Army that joined the war in the very end over the other Armies?

    There's no tech relation between the US Army and the Victory in the WW2 won by the Soviet Army who bore the brunt of the war with Germany who held hundreds of Armies on the Eastern but Western front.

    What was the tech edge of the US Army that joined the war in the very end over the other Armies?
     
  25. StealthDefender

    StealthDefender New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Very good post... WWI was actually won by France, WWII by Russia. Nevertheless the American bandwagon-jumpers are bragging about it.
    Almost every war after WWII they lost, mostly against a bunch of guerrillas. There is really nothing to brag about US military and all its "super technology". Actually they are quite pathetic.
     

Share This Page