PURE EVIL: Police Chief Breaks Down After Describing How Richmond Leftist Rioters Torched Home with

The police owe equal, fair treatment under the law to all. Period.

 

Not one single thing you said is true. You are literally, right now, doing exactly what you're accusing me of doing. You are making completely baseless accusations and not bringing an ounce of support with them. And.....they're personal attacks.

You are quite literally just making up stuff. It's as if you have me confused with someone else.

Or....like most lefties....you are accusing me that which you are guilty of (I think we're onto something).

 

No they just owe us EQUAL treatment under the law.

Do you owe the whites stolen property.

 

To change the laws to end this type of behavior.

Sorry, you can't change history to His-Story.

You didn't, America did.

Rioting is not the problem, but that's the cop out you try to use.

This is why we don't have a discussion, because of ignorant babble.

Well since I have done none of that, I don't know how it happens.

That's is what you wish we would do.

 

It's the truth. Mudman cannot support his assertions. He thinks his assertions are facts.

And all good Americans on this forum will keep pointing out his deficiencies in argumentation.

He will keep projecting his rhetorical inadequacies on his opponents.

 

you mean them twitter accounts run by them white supremacists were about this. yup.

 

you're making it all up.

 

Not sure what you are talking about. Nonsensical

 

Not at all...here's the Act....read for yourself:

Title IV made major sentencing reforms to the draconian sentences in Biden and Clinton law.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Step_Act


Title IV makes a variety of sentencing reforms. Section 401 amends the Controlled Substance Act (21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.) to constrain the application of sentencing enhancements for defendants with prior drug felony convictions by redefining “serious drug felony” and “serious violent felony,” to reduce the mandatory minimum sentence for a second violation from 20 years to 15 years, and to reduce the mandatory minimum sentence for a third violation from life to 25 years. It makes similar revisions to the Controlled Substance Import and Export Act at 21 U.S.C. § 960(b).

Section 402 expands the number of defendants who may be eligible for "safety valve" relief. Prior to the First Step Act, only defendants with one "criminal history point" could receive sentences below the mandatory minimums, but under the Act, defendants with up to four points (depending on the type of offense) may be eligible.[30]

Section 403 eliminates the "stacking" provision of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c).[31] Prior to this legislation, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)—which stipulated that an enhanced mandatory minimum sentence could be added when a gun was used in the commission of a “second or subsequent” conviction—was interpreted to permit the imposition of enhanced mandatory minimum sentences where a gun was used in a concurrently charged offense. The First Step Act clarified that gun enhancements can only be added where the defendant was previously (e.g. non-concurrently) convicted of a gun violation, so as to restrict sentencing enhancements to "true" repeat offenders.[32]

Section 404 applies the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010—which, among other things, reduced the discrepancy between sentences for crack cocaine and power cocaine convictions—retroactively. Under the First Step Act, prisoners who committed offenses "covered" by the Fair Sentencing Act are permitted to petition a court directly to reconsider their sentence (after certain administrative steps are satisfied).[33] Prior to this law, the Bureau of Prisons acted as the "gatekeeper" of prisoner petitions, and prisoners were not able to make motions to federal courts directly for back-end sentencing review.[34]

 

I take it that you accept Institutionalized racism is a real thing. I sourced it. And now you're started to interrogate me with 5 questions not related to Institutionalized racism.

 

you didn't debunk it with a source. So my source stands.

 

LOL. Yet another post of personal attacks with no justification to them.

Wanna go for another?

 

it's necessary for society to function. Most people abide by society's wishes. If you don't you tend to run afoul with enforcement.

So why should I give a rat's ass about something that happened to you 55 years ago? Did your **** about what happened to me 22 years ago?

 

If the Southern white racist society would have had their wishes Jim Crow segregation would have never ended, it took LAWS to end those racist practices. If you would have been living in an unjust society I would have given a rat's ass, but it's because of anti-black attitudes like yours that we have laws.

 

I understand the history tell me why I should care about it as though it was a current issue

first and foremost I did, I still do. And don't lie to me and say you give a rat's ass.

is it because I don't cry and bitch and complain about it constantly?

Oh poor little guy. Everyone that disagrees with you it's just anti-black.

Boohoo everyone hates me waa waa waa.

 

Hi objectively did the bucket, you simply don’t really know what you are talking about. Your source doesn’t prove what you claim it cruise and was easily

 

You shouldn't care if you don't want to, why should I care if you care or not.

is it because I don't cry and bitch and complain about it constantly?[/quote]

Well when you are not on the receiving end, most don't.

You are what you are.

 

you seem to care you keep talking about it. You keep suggesting that's something I need to understand if we're going to have a dialogue I understand.

I'm on the receiving end what's the weather in you will ever be. And currently not 55 years ago when you were seven. there's places in the world where people still exterminate people like me. Richest places in the world I can't go because I might face a death sentence that's not the case for you.

I know what I am better than you do. And notice I don't have to tell you what you are. Because my argument doesn't rely on perpetual victimhood yours does.

 

why is do not steal racist?

white folks do not owe black folks 40 acres and a mule

 

if they do not want to comply with lawful orders like everyone else, they could move to kenya

third world countries support anarchy, America is a first world country

 

Why don't you move to Siberia, you love everything white it would be a great place to live.

 

in America there is law and order, when you are caught stealing you have to submit to lawful orders.

kenya's police are underfunded and thieves can disobey orders to flea into the jungle.

 

Maybe you just have a vendetta against white people.

Maybe that's what all this is.

Maybe they're just your scapegoat.

 

Um.. that video was published by CBS News.

Nice deflection attempt though.

Care to grow a pair and actually condemn the loser looters?

 

I think its monstrous to intentionally light other people homes on fire in general.