The Pentagon on 9/11 - MODERATOR WARNING ISSUED

Discussion in '9/11' started by Bob0627, Nov 1, 2016.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Any word yet on what took down the light poles if it wasn't AA77? No? Carry on.
     
  2. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,320
    Likes Received:
    854
    Trophy Points:
    113
  3. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    28
  4. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    22,834
    Likes Received:
    11,828
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't recall there being any coherent response by you to the FDR issue for AA77. Silence and denial is all, with a smidgeon of ad hominem.
     
  5. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    28
    What FDR issue was that?
     
  6. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    22,834
    Likes Received:
    11,828
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As I predicted, denial....
     
  7. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Well, what about the poles. You charted it up to “theatrics” earlier as if there was some sort of bonus involved for pole arrangement…. care to try again?
     
  8. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,320
    Likes Received:
    854
    Trophy Points:
    113
  9. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Again, it was already addressed and discarded. And it makes no mention on why the supposed conspirators would even include the light poles from the beginning…. Just increase the approach angle by a degree or two and you clear the poles easily so you don’t have to pay off a bunch of guys to plant something, a cabbie to say his cab was hit, a wrecker driver to deliver the cab (which would have had to be staged too) and

    A) hope that nobody sees you do any of it in broad daylight
    B) hope that none of the planters/cabbies/drivers ever spill the beans

    Your asinine post makes no sense so it cannot be accepted. Sorry. Try again.
     
  10. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,320
    Likes Received:
    854
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No one who actually reads it will agree with you.
     
  11. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Which of course is why nobody gives you guys the time of day except to amuse themselves.
     
  12. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,320
    Likes Received:
    854
    Trophy Points:
    113
  13. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    For me the only story that counts that is total BS is the official fairy tale. It's not about light poles or theories about what really happened at the Pentagon, it's that we were LIED to and scammed by the Bush administration and their minions/accomplices about just about everything that has to do with 9/11. There was a mass murder on 9/11 and the complicit criminals covered it up and are using the coverup story as pretext to commit much more mass murder. The proof? The evidence exposed in these 2 threads just scratches the surface.

    http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-nist-9-11-scam-exposed-in-all-its-glory.458597/
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...mission-scam-exposed-in-all-its-glory.495859/

    And yes, there is quite a bit more to the above in many other videos and documents, you're absolutely right Scott:

    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...orted-9-11-terrorists.456423/#post-1066183060
     
    Last edited: May 10, 2017
    jack4freedom likes this.
  14. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Monty python was never as funny as your theory about why the light poles were included for no reason.
     
  15. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Yet you cannot quote any major inaccuracies in the 9/11 Commission Report OR account for the light poles being knocked down/why the conspirators would even include such an event in the scenario.

    Inform us if you ever make it off of square one.
     
  16. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Reminder, this thread is about The Pentagon on 9/11, not other posters. Please stick to the subject.
     
  17. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Of which there were 5 light poles knocked down.

    Why would the conspirators even include the scenario where the light poles were hit thus having to employ people to stage them—in broad day light.

    On top of that, if you believe the light poles were staged, the conspirators then had one of the light poles hitting a taxi cab. So now you have stagers and a taxi-cab.

    And since the cab had it’s windshield crashed in, you have to have another vehicle like a tow truck deliver the cab to the place where it was supposedly hit!!!!

    Since we’re on the topic, why not answer the question. Why would these conspirators that infect your mind include all of these needless people and the possibility that someone would see them doing what they do—since they were having to do it in broad daylight and all???

    Your move.
     
  18. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because it's not my theory, I wasn't there and don't have any answer for you as to what really happened to the light poles. As already stated multiple times, my problem is with the Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT), I have no problem with alternate theories even the claim is that Santa Claus did 9/11. All those theories are harmless. OTOH the OCT is a lethal scam that has caused the death of hundreds of thousands of innocent people and allowed the real criminals to get away with mass murder.

    I'll ask you the same question. Why is your mind infected by the conspirators who scammed YOU? Why do you feel the need to troll every thread with utter nonsense that you know is utter nonsense just because you disagree with everyone and everything that doesn't align 100% with the official fairy tale? Why have you never ever questioned one single thing about this blatantly obvious massive lie that even you know is a massive lie? What is your real purpose for posting in this section nearly 24/7 flailing at every post that exposes the SCAM? Do you understand this section of the forum is all about conspiracy THEORIES and not about attacking posters who post conspiracy theories?

    Why don't you take a stab at answering those questions?

    IMO, 9/11 belongs in a section by itself because it is NOT a conspiracy theory no matter what anyone wants to believe really happened, it is a CONSPIRACY FACT. Terrorists murdered over 3,000 people and caused massive destruction on 9/11/01. The question is who are all the terrorists responsible. Unlike you, I know the official story is a scam and that it's "accurate" to you (according to you) is also a lie. You know yourself that's not even within the realm of reality. You fool no one. Unlike you I question EVERYTHING about the official story because not one word is reliable.
     
  19. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ahh I see, so the fact that the ONLY thing that could knock down the poles given their distance apart from one another and the approach vector and that no other poles were knocked down was a large jet has escaped your supposed 16 years of research….



    <Mod Edit-Rule 2/3>


    Hey, the light poles are physical evidence that you choose not to account for. There has to be some explanation….

    As for the “scam” <Mod Edit-rule 2/3>…100% of the 911 Commission Report makes perfect sense; is backed up by the physical evidence, and the famous impotence of you and your buddies to find one major inaccuracy in the 9/11 Commission report all point to it’s accuracy.

    <Mod Edit-Rule 2>

    As for “attacking”…yeah okay; Questioning your theory or plan is attacking you? Prepare for a life of misery then…its what happens IRL every day.
    Take the light poles for example. Your buddies have stated that they were staged for “theatrics”. Are we supposed to let that ridiculous statement go unchallenged? If so, post it in the poetry section; this ain’t it.

    <Mod Edit-Rule 2>
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 11, 2017
  20. willburroughs

    willburroughs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2013
    Messages:
    2,276
    Likes Received:
    324
    Trophy Points:
    83
    And yet, you come right out and dismiss his post because your thread is not about that. You don't want a discussion or honest debate. You just want a circle jerk with your tinfoil hat fellowship.
     
  21. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Couldn't have stated it better myself..
     
  22. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    At least you acknowledge that's what you're here for. Good thing you failed to answer or even address one single question that I posed you.

    Re-phrase your post omitting the personal attacks, sticking to the subject of this thread (hint: I'm not it) and I will respond as I see fit. Until then, I am no longer interested in responding to your insult filled post(s). If I respond in kind, the post(s) will get deleted as yours should be.
     
  23. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Same goes for you. I dismissed his post and will continue to do so with similar posts unless and until posters stick to the topic of the thread. The only reason I'm responding to your insulting post is so you understand my position. An honest debate or discussion is about discussing the topic of the thread (in case you missed it, I'm not the topic of the thread, the topic of this thread is and always will be The Pentagon on 9/11). If Shiner or you want to discuss a different topic, find the appropriate thread or start your own. In any case, I'm not here to debate anyone, I've posted that countless times but perhaps you missed it. I'm here to discuss, minus the insults (see bolded from your post), there is a vast difference. As for who I choose to have a discussion with, that's my prerogative. If you don't like it, avoid my posts, it's as simple as that, you have the exact same prerogative.
     
  24. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As promised, I will no longer respond to posts that include insults and/or other personal attacks (i.e. feeding the trolls). Posts of that nature will be reported. If a post is merely off topic, it will be pointed out in any thread I started. Specific posters are always off topic aside from discussing why they subscribe to their respective personal opinions on the specific topic being discussed.

    Now that I got that out of the way:

    The issue with the knocked down light poles at the Pentagon came up in this thread and it is the same as the issue with all 9/11 physical evidence. I posted 29 facts about the 9/11 Commission and their report. This one (#20) applies to the light poles:

    20. There is no evidence that the 9/11 Commission conducted any criminal/scientific/forensic investigation in accordance with universally accepted standards appropriate for such an investigation. Especially within the vast scope required by a major historical event such as 9/11. Much of the contents of the 9/11 Commission Report is unvetted and/or unsupported by legitimate evidence (any evidence obtained via the use of torture is illegitimate/unreliable - see #16).

    With regard to the light poles, not only did the 9/11 Commission fail to forensically analyze what happened to them but they were never even mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report. As a result, we will never know what really happened to them and that means all we have left is theory.

    IMO far more important than the light poles is the issue with failure to conduct a forensic match of the serial numbers from the allegedly recovered debris to the parts logs of the 4 claimed planes as required by NTSB airplane crash investigation protocol. A serial number match (a fairly simple procedure) would PHYSICALLY identify the actual aircraft with 99.9% certainty. That this was never done and that FOIA requests for such a match were categorically denied leads one to conclude that the US government is covering up the true identity of the recovered parts and that these are very likely NOT from the officially claimed airliners (AA77, AA11, UA93 and UA175). If they were from those planes, they would be eager to prove it.
     
    Last edited: May 11, 2017
  25. usda_select

    usda_select Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 28, 2016
    Messages:
    832
    Likes Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Who is "we"? You have a mouse in your pocket?

    The rest of the world knows what happened, Flight 77 knocked them down on the way to hitting the Pentagon.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page