The Pentagon on 9/11 - MODERATOR WARNING ISSUED

LOLOLOLOL

If you actually consulted experts, you wouldn't be making a fool of yourself on here.

 

Again, the opinion of a troll who's incessantly trolling is still worthless. Worse, where in hell were you educated or were you?

I guess that was also a typo. Talk about making a fool of yourself.

 

I'm not the one seeing ghosts, Bob.

Btw, I spent my working life cutting, bending, and welding steel, not sitting behind some desk.
When I was in school, only girls and gays took typing.

Of course the spelling and grammar always police show up when they have nothing valid to say about the subject on hand.

 

But this isn't an air accident, this was a criminal attack using aircraft. Therefore it is not the NTSB's domain.

 

Again, airplane crashes are ALWAYS the domain of the NTSB and federal crimes are the domain of the FBI. That's because the expertise on airline crashes lies strictly with the NTSB, not the FBI. This is why the claim was the FBI took over the investigation with the ASSISTANCE of the NTSB. And the other claim that the NTSB ASSISTED with the parts identification for which we have not one crumb of evidence. Because airplane parts identification is strictly the domain of the NTSB, not the FBI. Furthermore, the NTSB investigated the Egyptair crash which was a suicide that killed all on board, a crime. Why do you have such a problem with this simple concept (or more likely trying to resist/deny it as best as you can)? Who are you being an apologist for as usual?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EgyptAir_Flight_990

 

And here I thought you were a pilot. You never sat behind a desk growing up either.

That sounds very misogynistic and homophobic.

Because of your incessant trolling posts you've been analyzed for your background. You're way too transparent so the conclusion is obvious (to me anyway).

Anyway you're not the subject of this thread, I really don't care about your silly opinions. You've shown over and over again you rarely make any sense and your logic is off the rails. Your only expertise is trolling. So there is no valid discussion to be had with you.

 

I thought you didn't believe in psychology? ...

 

I don't, I try to personally assess posters' mentality based on their posts.

 

(from post #1044)

It would be about twenty percent shorter at an angle as your plane shows. It still protrudes way past the edge of the gate-lifting mechanism.

(image post #1044)
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-pentagon-on-9-11.482175/page-53#post-1069614078

Compare that with this.
https://256stuff.com/cgi-bin/pix?/gray/thoughts/2001/20010912/pictures/pentagon/000_m.jpg&nc&nb

 

that's called psychology Bob ... most people have an understanding of most sciences whether they have studied or not ...

 

You must be an exception. Someone who has no clue what the difference is between science and pseudoscience shouldn’t be trying to explain anything about the pseudoscience known as psychology. As already explained to you from the videos I posted psychologists agree it’s pseudoscience and not science. But you’re here contradicting experts. Just like you’re here contradicting engineers. Stick to what you know best, using the juvenile term “troofer” every chance you get. You show you don’t know very much else. And that I’ve assessed about you day 1.

 

I didn't fly for a living Bob, strictly for fun and adventure. Though one time I brought a few cases of whiskey to a remote native village.
misogynistic and homophobic is a copout, back in the early 60's, it was life.
Bet you took home economics too.

And of course there is no valid discussion with me.
I want direct answers to direct questions, something you refuse to do.

Do you hear voices.

 

you posted 2 vids and claim that psychologists agree that psychology is a pseudoscience? ... please explain schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anxiety, depression etc ...

and you continue to try and psychologically profile me? ... how ****ed up is that? ...

 

Because if you don't agree with him, or ask him questions he doesn't want to answer,
It's you, who has the mental disorder, and needs psychiatric help.

 

I'm wondering why, after the government murdered all these thousands of people, and the many more in the coverup.
Why aren't they killing the people who ratted on them.
It seems they would have prime targets, the book writers, the people on social media sites,
yet these people keep spewing accusations, not in the least bit worried the government will come after them.

Another point.
The government can't even sue for defamation of character, because a very important defense is,
No rational person would believe them.

That's what Larry Flint used when Jerry Falwell sued him for a phony add he posted in his mag.

 

How many more do you need?

This thread is about the Pentagon on 9/11. Not only is this discussion off topic but it’s not my job nor my interest to explain invented “diseases” to you.

I already had you pegged from day 1 so there’s no need for me to “continue” to waste my time on a subject I have zero interest in.

I’m still waiting to see if you actually want to discuss the topic of this thread on an adult and intelligent level. So far I see no indication of that ever remotely happening.

 

please post sections again ... let's try to to stay on topic here ...

 

I’m ok with that. I’d prefer the below issues but I have no problem if you choose something else.

Post #731 (last sentence)
Post #733
Post #750 (second paragraph, last sentence)
Post #768
Post #771

 

Hey Bob.

Aren't you afraid of the government coming over to your house and killing you,
because you discovered what really happened, and you're telling everyone.

 

The conspiracy theory is a useful propaganda tool, and related to the false flag operation, a classical military strategy. The one advanced by the 911 Commission may be the best example of that.

 

Here are some psychologists analyzing people who still believe the official story.

Scientific View - Why you can't believe the truth about 9/11 - Because your scared of the Truth


http://www1.ae911truth.org/faqs/821-why-do-good-people-become-silentor-worseabout-911-.html

I find that younger people are much more objective when they look at the proof that the government, with possible help from the outside, planned and carried out the attacks. Older people usually experience cognitive dissonance and go into denial.
https://www.britannica.com/science/cognitive-dissonance

 

post #731 ... Chandler was only the narrator of the presentation ... I would rather discuss Coste's findings ...

 

Many would rather discuss ANYTHING BUT the many failures of the official narrative.

 

True but he claims Coste changed his mind about the Pentagon issue and the post was in response to your belief that Chandler "must be coming to his senses", which was a silly belief.

Well instead of saying that just go for it. What would you like to discuss in terms of Coste's findings? Some of the choices I listed are part of Coste's findings.

 

I don't believe that Chandler had any issues with Coste's findings ... although I thought he sounded uncomfortable at times ...

please list your choices again ... I am sure they have to do with parts matches which is only seconds of the hours long video presentation ... I repeat, hours long which I watched in it's entirety that focuses very well on the scientific evidence of what happened to AA77 and the Pentagon ...

please drop your parts matches spiel for awhile and look at the other evidence of AA77 crashing into the Pentagon ...