The Progressive Agenda means the Right to Earn a Living Wage for All Americans.

"While companies have been under significant pressure over the past decade to invest in the domestic manufacturing sector, many of the companies bringing the most jobs back to America are not necessarily doing so for political reasons. Some of the most common reasons cited for reshoring manufacturing jobs are to capitalize on the brand value of the Made in USA label, proximity to the U.S. customer base, the country’s skilled workforce, and government incentives." Evidently, much of this was in the works before Trump according to USA TODAY

 

Your thread is DEAD! You've lost the arguments. Get over it and wait for the results of the 2018 election.

Come the next election in Nov., SURPRISE! again.

Steve

 

Yet another BOGUS allegation with absolutely ZERO substantiation.

 

Another vapid trolling post duly noted and ignored for derogatory reasons.

 

Pretty much EVERYTHING that is POSITIVE about the current economy was put in place BEFORE the BLOTUS began infesting the Oval office.

Nothing that he has done has been for the benefit of hardworking Americans.

 

That is Liberal bull crap. During Obama's 8 years in office, over 300,00 manufacturing was lost. What is bringing them back is a cut in what was the highest corporate tax in the whole industrial world and record regulations against them. along with rising wages and shipping cost abroad. If the Democrats get back in power, they have stated they will do away with the tax cut and put back on many of those regulations. How smart is that? You people need to open your eyes and stop believing that Liberal bull ****. As late as 2013, a full 77% of all jobs created that year were all part time jobs.They want to take us back to what caused all those service and part time jobs. What chased out 300,000 manufacturing jobs. It doesn't take rocket science to know you can't keep repeating the same thing over and over and expect a different outcome.

 

You may have the most closed mind on this forum

 

Another stupid commit. Did you see the kind of jobs coming back I posted? Many are in the automotive industry. One of the best paying jobs in the industry for Blue Collar workers and union personal. They say for every job created in those plants, it creates 6-8 more jobs outside the plant to service it. The kind of jobs being created will lift many out of poverty and off low paying service and part time jobs. One only has to look at the millions who have gotten off welfare and food stamps to know your wrong in what your saying.

 

Obama was a defeatist who seems to like the idea of Americans losing good jobs to china and the slow growth economy that creates

Trump thinks positive and is bringing jobs back to America

 

Highly ironic on your part duly noted for the record.

 

"They say"?

Who exactly is "they"?

 

Creating a better business environment means more jobs for American workers by returning jobs to America

Now if we could get on with the effort to deport illegal aLiens who are filling some of those jobs...

 

Your BLOTUS has done NOTHING whatsoever as far as "creating a better business environment" goes.

 

Most people are pleased with the trump economy

Obama was a welfare baby loser with little knowledge of the private sector

 

Economists. It isn't hard to figure out if you use your head. That plant needs all kinds of parts to make those cars and trucks. They don't make most of the parts there, they are brought in. They need people to make those parts. They need trains and trucks to bring in those parts and take out the finished product. They need people to service that plant. They need people to feed those employees. When you have thousands more working, they are buying, taking vacations, flying, paying taxes.They are getting new homes etc. Now do you know how they figure it?

 

Obama was prescient when he pointed that your BLOTUS didn't "build" the current booming economy that he INHERITED.

 

Your failure to cite any of these imaginary "economists" who make this allegation is duly noted.

Supply chains for manufacturing is nothing new so pretending that this is something that your BLOTUS is responsible for is nonsensical. It is worth noting that Carrier still laid off all those workers when it moved to Mexico because the supply chain for the parts was available where the workers are paid less.

As far new homes are concerned Millennials can't afford them because they are still SADDLED with the Republican/Libertarian DEBT of college loans. Your BLOTUS has not done SQUAT to help out the LARGEST voting bloc in the nation.

 

Meaning obama does not deserve credit for the end of the recession since bush probably made the moves that obama took credit for later

 

Wrong, as usual!

The Republican/Libertarian fiscal malfeasance is what "built" the 2008 economic collapse. Bush jr was instrumental in much of the legislation that resulted in the collapse.

Obama was responsible for "building" the economic RECOVERY that your BLOTUS is disingenuously taking credit for.

 

No

By your logic the culprit would be clinton before bush took office

 

They mustn't lay blame on big government's economic 'solutions' to "unfairness", "inequity" and "social injustice", so leftists, the conspicuous champions of "fairness", "equality" and "social justice", will never acknowledge the truth. They orchestrated Occupy Wall Street to deflect from the truth.

The foundation for the economic collapse was "built" by the Clinton administration's National Homeownership Strategy...a particularly stupid bit of fascism that systematically coerced private sector mortgage lenders into freeing up trillions of dollars in Social Justice Loans for "underserved communities" (read: poor minorities).

What happened thereafter was 100% rational human behavior...risk shedding and profit taking. Big government's 'solution' even included a receptacle in which lenders could shed the risk; Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

And to profit taking, it would seem even the economic geniuses on the left would understand that freeing up mountains of easy money to be spent in a specific segment of the economy (housing) would bump up against the immutable economic law of Supply and Demand.

 

Clinton started the home loan policy but bush partipated in it and even bragged about rising black home ownership

In washington stupidity is a bipartisan problem

 

No. Your guy almost single-handedly, overturned a maxim that states, it merely takes multibillion dollar budget surpluses to make more money.

 

A belief that obama embraced wholeheartedly

 

Obama turned our economy around; upward trends have been happening since His administration.