"Trump admin has no strategy for election security, and no one's in charge"

Given we have been told that russia cannot hack our vote tallies or election machines, what security are you addressing here? You want to shut down social media? Any media that tells the truth about future candidates? Execute whistle blowers that russia can use the truthful info to affect a canidate? What?

Our elections, IMO, and I think historical fact backs this us, are at greater threat from americans. Not russians. Consider the sanders candidacy and the banana republic and collusion between the dnc and MSM. Consider voter rolls being expunged, in areas that the common wisdom said would in large numbers vote for sanders in new york. I have not heard a single democrat, hillary voter, raise hell about this, here!! Give me a f***ing break here!

Obama even told us our elections are safe from russians. In 2016. Who said they were not? Oh, perhaps hillary? The DNC? Consider that source boys.

 

Mueller wasn't appointed to prosecute a crime. He was appointed to placate the lefts base, who were stirred nearly to violence by the left wing medias 24/7 anti-Trump drumbeat, simply because he won the election. That's why it's referred to by Trump and many others as a witch hunt. One would think that the DNC and Clinton campaign using foreign spies and Russian nationals, the FBI, wiretaps, embedded spies, the full resources of ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN and MSNBC would collectively be able to find this supposed collusion if it existed, especially since the left says that Trump is an unhinged, undisciplined moron.

 

So you opine but ignore the statutes and rule of law. Rosey and Mueller are Republicans, and Mueller is a patriot.

 

Just reminding you of an aspect not present in you posts. Many people who are smarter and more experienced than me, say there was never a need for a SC...and that it was a mistake or even nonsensical. I can understand and support both, either a SC or not. Don't get me wrong, If Trump or anybody actually conspired with a foreign government to subvert our election, I'd be the first one to call out the "read aim fire" cadence.

 

And they are partizan and politican shills being paid to opine, your point? You are up against the Republican SC, the Republican DAJ, the Republican DOJ and the statutes and rule of law. What you or I believe is not relevant here, the process is legal and warranted.

 

There is no proof that the supposed leaked NSA document is authentic.

As far as we know, the document was created by a bunch of Russians.

 

The PF trolls NEVER DEBATE THE ISSUES...it is beyond their scope.


A few of the PF left do...thankfully....

 

Then why was she incarcerated? Come on man, that's a pure desperation post.

 

You speak the truth. Debate does not interest them.

 

LOLOL.. Trump is nothing if not disorganized and chaotic. His cabinet people have begun to ignore him and just do their jobs.

 

You still don't understand Uranium One.. That's really troubling.. Neither does Trump.

 

Bullshit and bullshit. THIRTEEN HILLARY DONORS, an Obama Adm. LAWYER, and a SENIOR FBI OFFICIAL SO CORRUPT HE WASS FORCED TO RESIGN WHEN THE HOUSE DISCOVERED IT, all say otherwise.

 

The first three words of the quoted post are totally applicable to the quoted "post".......you have come full circle, congrats!

 

Who are the PF trolls you are referencing? Tks.

 

Are the Black Panthers going to be intimidating voters again, otherwise what sort of security do we need? Or is this one of those 'we lost' must be the Russians things?

 

FYI ... "Reality" is about to hit home for "Winner" ... Your fellow patriot praying the judge accepts the terms of the 5 year plea agreement ... instead of imposing the 10 years it deserves.

 

So you are still avoiding the actual PDF............well that was easy!

 

Nothing in that PDF says registries were altered. That's your bogus claim.

 

Read it again, nothing in it that says they were not and what about the second doc that Winner was going to leak? And were the RU Fed in there to study English? Brushing up on critical thinking skills would help.

 

Show me the 2nd doc ... There's nothing in that PDF that supports your bogus claim. Debates aren't won, nor are facts established through fatigue. If anything in that PDF could help you save face, you'd have posted the snippets. It is the citation YOU provided right?

 

What's you assessment of the first doc? Why were the RU Fed there and what would you have done if you were there? That's called critical thinking......I'll wait for you to provide an honest answer and while you are at it, why was this doc TOP SECRET if it does not matter?

 

Oh! it matters ... 5 year minimum in a federal prison. I think very critically of posters who refuse to admit that their claims aren't supported by the citations they make me waste my time reading. No US agency, or states election board reports voter registries were altered ... period. "Winner's" PDF included. YOU read it again ... and when YOU find something that proves registries were altered, post it ... along with that 2nd doc you're babbling about.

 

I'll take this "commentary" as a pure dodge so 'll ask you the questions again:
1.What's you assessment of the first doc?
2.Why were the RU Fed there and what would you have done if you were there? That's called critical thinking......I'll wait for you to provide an honest answer and
3.while you are at it, why was this doc TOP SECRET if it does not matter?

 

My assessment is that voter registries weren't altered. Tell me what part, in fact post the part that makes you insist otherwise OK? Maybe I do need help with my critical thinking ... As to what I'd have done ... followed my chain of command. If not satisfied, mailed the docs to each member of the "gang of 8". I'm former active military, I know to follow SOP. Nothing "Winner" leaked posed any eminent danger. Lock it up!

 

So , with your critical thinking cap on, why were the RU Fed in there? If it were you, what would you have been doing in there and why was this TOP SECRET?