Which is why you buy a quality gun with a quality mag. Or are krap makers that make iPhone cases your preferred magazine maker? https://www.magpul.com/products/organization-and-gear/phone-cases
Magpul is a reputable vendor. We've all seen your demonstrated experience with firearms and the laws surrounding them
If you call Wilson or Chip McCormick crap in the 1911's No one knows the system like Larry Vickers who calls for rotation or replacement about every three years and he's probably about right. AR's are a bit tougher but not incredibly so. MagPul's are very good but Tango Down IMHO have the rep. Glock and many/most AK's are simply indestructible.
You buy an M1 tank, complete with heat and sabot rounds capable of opening a bank vault to prove me wrong.
https://www.gunsamerica.com/blog/magpul-on-glock-pmag-17-gl9-ok-we-screwed-up/ On the other hand their HIGH QUALITY T SHIRTS do seem to fit CAPTAIN AMERICA types https://www.amazon.com/Magpul-T-Shi...01ALQ6IIA/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8
So you'e saying I'm right on the nose and trying to flatter me to distract me? That's weird kid, hang out with people your own age.
Yes, You should know, I am sure there are mirrors on your side. You seem well suited and superbly qualifed.
best AR 15 magazines-Lancer with the steel lips the old stainless steel military contract ones Magpuls are very good. better than standard military Best pistol mags--Mec Gar is what I run in my 2400 dollar CZ CTS steel gun. they are the best. Glock factory mags are very good too
I run magpul magazines in my many AR 15s but the MCX I keep next to me in my office for use against home invasions is fed with Lancers. Magpuls are pretty good though. Their GLOCK magazines I run in steel for PCC events. Those who say Magpuls are crap is a poser. And before you start with nonsense, I have been shooting competitively 45 years and have held master ratings in every thing from ISU skeet and NCSA clays to several pistol events.
In some states, there are laws written regarding the legality of knives that are so vague that even many charged with enforcing the law have difficulty understanding what is and isn’t allowed. The result is that Enforcement often becomes capriciously discretionary; have the wrong look about you piss an officer off and you could be charged with a weapons crime or a weapons charge can added to any other offense to compound the original offense. Such laws can be discriminatory as charges My be more likely leveled against a minority. These vague laws become weapons themselves. Libs have an incremental agenda to impose conformity of thinking, constrain liberty, and promote the supremacy of government over the individual and use a never ending array means to achieve their goals. They demonize non conformists by hyjacking and re-defining and the meaning of common words and phrases (think assault rifle, common sense, full auto, semi auto, reasonable, etc), use dishonest propoganda, slander where expedient, and seek incrementally to generate laws that help them achieve their goals. While on on hand, they continually attempt in recasting and subverting the protections for the individual of the Constitution, they will hide behind the words (think 1st) when they find it expedient...many seeing the Constitution as mailable to their needs. Creating bans, implementing registration, are all part of crafting a tool kit that enables them to persecute the unconforming. In the case of guns, if they can’t get a majority to support repealing the 2A, they seek creating laws that set penalties that are designed to remove gun rights from non conformists... have illegal magazines, have an unregistered gun, etc. and you become a criminal subject to losing your rights. The issue of gun rights with the faux justification of saving lives is a cover for removing or silencing political opposition; those that promote gun rights and that own guns is a relatively easy way to identify that opposition. Banning high capacity mags, semi autos, congress doesn’t have the authority to Amend the Constitution without ratification by the states.
Congress can change and or add or subtract gun laws at will, all they need is agreement, you need to get over this, as it is fact. The gun laws that exist and there are many are proof of this. You people and I mean that with diddain are not grasping that there are gun laws that all people abide by. Where did they come from? the sky?
What is your time in the mile and how much can you bench press. Any turd can pull a trigger as the retard in Texas just proved. Magpul makes cell phone cases.................... You have a competitive cell phone case too?
Wow Mom jokes, amazing, is this your intellectual function level? My Mom died in 1993, thanks for playing, you may pick up your consolation prize on the way out.
Yep, PA is one of those states. http://www.ydr.com/story/news/watch...le-at-risk-of-criminal-prosecution/427791001/
No room for the chainsaw bayonet with that stuff. http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...assault-rifles-can-modified-chainsaw-bayonet/
Except for the fact that it cannot. Except for the fact that it does. Which has never been stated otherwise. But there is not enough political appetite to actually engage in such a course of action, especially when it comes to the notion of eliminating the second amendment from existence.
Are law enforcement, the military, and government agencies most users? Magazines do indeed wear out and break over time, so the dismissal of the point is not valid. If congress attempted to outlaw capacity, based solely on the premise that it can do so if it wants, manufacturers can subject them to the same limitations, thus putting military and law enforcement in a bind.
Didn't talk about your mom kid. Go play outside, the adults are talking. Though you did ask earlier who passes amendments, your mom? So I find it kind of incredulous that you're sensitive about such things.
I am 58, at 25 it was about 4.25. Don't recall bench press, I was a finalist for the 80 and 88 olympic team as a shooter, not a weightlifter or track guy.