Should trans individuals be banned from teaching grade-high school?

Discussion in 'Opinion POLLS' started by Turin, May 5, 2023.

?

Should trans individuals be banned from teaching grade-high school?

  1. Yes - In public schoools only

    1 vote(s)
    2.0%
  2. Yes - In All school

    18 vote(s)
    36.0%
  3. No - Maybe in private school

    4 vote(s)
    8.0%
  4. No - In all schools.

    27 vote(s)
    54.0%
  1. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,236
    Likes Received:
    39,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I would say their phycological state of confusion about their sex is causing the distress and disability and therefore it is a mental disorder.

    Depends on the mental disorder don't ya think?
     
  2. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,157
    Likes Received:
    33,014
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You are the one that believes gay people not being forced into the closet is the reason you are not getting enough babies.

    You are trying to blame gay people when it is policies that you support that is actually causing the birth decline.

    Do you support free healthcare for children? Free world class education? Free housing?

    I think it is best to support families regardless of their makeup
     
  3. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    79,033
    Likes Received:
    19,958
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    We are animals, just like other creatures.
    We don't have special characteristics. But perhaps a larger brain.

    Human biology is about 88% hetero. The other 12% is made up of LGBTQ.
     
  4. robini123

    robini123 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,701
    Likes Received:
    1,583
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Are you a psychologist? If not then do you have a a link to a peer reviewed study that concludes it is a mental disorder? If not then I argue that laws and bans should not be passed based upon people’s prejudices.

    If we are to ban teachers with mental illnesses then we will have to ban many as humans suffer from a wide variety of mental illnesses. I argue that there is no such thing as a human that reaches the age of majority without the baggage of one mental disorder or another.
     
    Last edited: May 31, 2023
  5. AARguy

    AARguy Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2021
    Messages:
    14,265
    Likes Received:
    6,652
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    All it takes is a caring parent, not a PhD to make this decision.
     
  6. LiveUninhibited

    LiveUninhibited Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Messages:
    9,730
    Likes Received:
    3,008
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender dysphoria is definitely a mental disorder. But so are various forms of anxiety and depression. It's laughable to state that mental disorders per se make one unfit to teach. It's not at all that simple.
     
    robini123 likes this.
  7. robini123

    robini123 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,701
    Likes Received:
    1,583
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I disagree. It takes someone trained in psychology to make such assessment. Parents can come to their own conclusions but they will be based upon ignorance as opposed to knowledge in terms of deciding is a teacher is mentally fit or not to teach.
     
    Last edited: May 31, 2023
  8. AARguy

    AARguy Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2021
    Messages:
    14,265
    Likes Received:
    6,652
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Valuing any academic pursuit more than the love of a parent is tyranny... and evil.
     
  9. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,458
    Likes Received:
    14,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I thought conservatives were supposed to be about freedom.

    Wanting to ban the mention of lbgt issues in schools, banning drag queen shows in libraries, and now talking about banning lbgt teachers, is pure authoritarianism just like the Soviets and the Nazis.

    So much for "freedom".
     
  10. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    16,925
    Likes Received:
    13,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    This. I don't want our assistant secretary of health to be teaching. I don't want that person in high powered positions at all. But, most trans people are just honest people who want to live their lives. Most that we personally know are passable, as they are truly treating their dysphoria and take their outward appearance very seriously.
     
  11. AARguy

    AARguy Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2021
    Messages:
    14,265
    Likes Received:
    6,652
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So... how about we teach your 5 year old sister how to give oral sex... or teach your five year old brother about anal sex with practical exercises? Is THAT your idea of "freedom"?
     
  12. AARguy

    AARguy Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2021
    Messages:
    14,265
    Likes Received:
    6,652
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So... how about we teach your 5 year old sister how to give oral sex... or teach your five year old brother about anal sex with practical exercises?
    Is that YOUR idea of FREEDOM?
     
  13. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,236
    Likes Received:
    39,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    OH geeezzzz a bacteria is a creature and you see no difference between us and them...................that's just too rich................:roflol:

    Human biology is a heterosexual species, when you can show me a new life created through homosexuality let me know. And 2% engage in homosexuality as a behavior.
     
  14. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,236
    Likes Received:
    39,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You are the one who believes in ending heterosexuality and banning families with both mothers and fathers in them. If you are going to make up arguments for me then I will make them up for you.

    How does less heterosexuality and more homosexuality sustain let alone increase birth rates?

    No I do not believe doctors and nurses should work for free and provide healthcare to all the children. No I do not believe teachers and administrators should work for free providing a world class education to all the children. No I do not believe land should be free and carpenters and plumbers and electricans should work for free to build houses for everyone.

    Which should we encourage and promote?
     
  15. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,414
    Likes Received:
    31,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Can you show me evidence that all members of our species procreate? That's literally what you are claiming, and that's hot garbage. According to your logic, redheads don't exist because they are too rare.
     
  16. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,414
    Likes Received:
    31,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There isn't a single human being on the planet that is so dumb that they think that being okay with gay people means that you want everyone to be gay. There are lobotomized pet rocks capable of better thinking than that.
     
    Nemesis likes this.
  17. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,414
    Likes Received:
    31,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your question assumes that we can only promote everyone having babies or no one having babies. It isn't an honest question.
     
  18. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,157
    Likes Received:
    33,014
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I have never said anything that could remotely be construed by any logical person as that.

    You however seem to believe gay people shouldn’t have representation and should keep their lives private. Is that not what you are pushing?

    I never said it did. Most studies have put the number of gay people around 10% for decades. Self-assessment is just now catching up.

    Free means to the end user, paid for by taxes. So you don’t really care for the well being of a child and “protecting” them from rainbows is as far as you are willing to do. Zero personal sacrifice outside of demanding you get to control their surroundings.

    Got it

    My answer isn’t going to change. We should encourage and promote loving and stable families regardless of their makeup.
     
    yardmeat likes this.
  19. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,236
    Likes Received:
    39,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yea like the stuff you make up for me, you keep doing it and I will keep doing it.

    And you however seem to believe we should end heterosexuality and and homosexuals should not keep it private and just have sex on the street. See I can do it too.

    2%

    Right it's not free. So you want to take control of all children and just leave out the parents and the government pay for everything and everyone can sacrifice everything they own to support it.

    Got it

    Why should we promote homosexuality. What is vital and necessary about it. You said for population control but when I pointed out our population has started to shrink you said I shouldn't blame it on homosexuality. Well which is it?
     
  20. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,236
    Likes Received:
    39,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    We SHOULD encourage and support ALL engaging in heterosexuality and a nuclear family and having babies we should even sanction it. It is vital and necessary to our survival as a species and society.
     
  21. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,236
    Likes Received:
    39,255
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    More hyperbole I didn't say "want everyone to be gay". Should we encourage and support and sanction homosexuality? If so why.
     
  22. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,414
    Likes Received:
    31,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The idea that everyone in the country should have a baby is complete nonsense, and you know it. That isn't required for the survival of our species or society. NO species has ever done that. Ever.
     
  23. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,414
    Likes Received:
    31,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It isn't hyperbole. That's literally your argument: that we can only promote everyone having babies or no one having babies. That is LITERALLY what you've argued. Your argument dissolves without this ridiculous assumption.
     
  24. cd8ed

    cd8ed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    42,157
    Likes Received:
    33,014
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Except I can immediately deny when you “make up” something I have said. You don’t seem to be able to deny it or even respond to simple questions regarding it.

    Simply false, studies done as far back in the 50’s when gay men were being arrested for being homosexual using a penile plethysmograph show that around 9% - 10% of the male population showed attraction to other males.
    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0306312714562103?icid=int.sj-abstract.citing-articles.19

    As society has moved more towards tolerance and acceptance, more people have the freedom to openly identify as who they are.

    Such hyperbole. If you had a point you wouldn’t need to do that.

    I believe that funds should be allocated to public programs to help families that are in need. Children should be given free food at schools, said meals should be nutritionally sound. All healthcare should be provided at no cost to the patient as long as they are a minor.

    I have never said we should promote homosexuality for population control. Wtf are you even talking about.

    I simply do not care what the family unit is comprised of — they deserve equal support. If it’s two women, fine. If it’s an adoptive elderly heterosexual couple, wonderful. If it’s a single biological father, good for him. They all deserve support so that children can grow up healthy and happy with the highest chance of success.

    Want to know to to kill that completely? Defunding schools. Malnutrition. Housing insecurity. Spousal abuse in the home. Orphanages. And telling children that their family isn’t good enough.
     
  25. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    79,033
    Likes Received:
    19,958
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    We are on the animal taxonomy. Something most learn in grade school.

    You're full of crap thinking human biology is a heterosexual species. They make up the majority.
     

Share This Page