“Colorblind” Conservative Republicans....

That's liberal, not especially libertarian. It's what we on the left used to believe .. until we became 'religious ideologues', and started to care more about your opinions than your material circumstances. Quite a fundamental error, made universally and throughout history, by those who have too much safety and too much food.

 

It most definitely is libertarian.

The root word of libertarian is liber for liberty.

Liberty simply means letting individuals live in peace to make their own decisions, so long as they extend the same respect to other individuals.

It's also liberal in the classical sense of that word. Libertarian is just a modern word for "classical liberal".

 

Heh! You're confirming more and more my theory that you are really a right leaning troll who's been fooling us the whole time. Keep it up!

 

So you are saying there is no such algorithm that determines the percent of the 60% that voted? I would think the eligible black voters would qualify as the "THE" 100% of THOSE blacks that voted, no? Non-registered non-voters do not quantify but serve as a separate category, call them, potential voters if you may, but in no way add or detract from the overall percentage of the 60% or 100% of the total that voted..

¯\_(º¸º)_/¯

 

Although I empathize with what you want, voting based on ideology or at the least, interests, we no longer live in a country like that. Actual economic conditions used to be one of the main determinations on who would win elections. Now it's barely a ripple. As former Singaporean President Lee Kuan Yew said, "In multiracial societies, you don't vote in accordance with your economic interests and social interests, you vote in accordance with race and religion."

I think the future of the US is politics breaking more and more on ethnic and racial lines. Those trends have been in effect for a while, and as our nation becomes more diverse, I expect it will continue.

 

So what you are saying is that being white is evolutionarily superior?

How are you not a white supremacist again?

 

So now there you go blaming the white man tsk tsk !!!

 

The OP is claiming that virtually all black people vote Democrat when many eligible black people don't vote at all. Not participating in (useless) elections is not an automatic vote for Democrats. I don't see why these potential voters can't be seen as up for grabs by the Republicans, Independents, or other political factions.

 

Dont get much whiter than Joe and the DNC!

 

I agree, the Republican Party should totally and unequivecally embrace White Supremacy as their guiding principle.

 

Or is it virtually all "Black Voters"? I suppose one would have to cut thru the petty parsing of words and use common sense to see that total, by all things logical, would simply be "Voters"

 

Well, of course OP'er wont honestly say those things. It would rock his world to admit how deadly accurate you are.

 

I think turning the Republican Party into a White Nationalist party would be awesome!!!

 

It’s not a problem at all. Nobody cares that Japanese society favors the Japanese and not the Kenyan tourist who goes there and is unable to speak the language or adapt to their society. People make their own civilizations for themselves. It’s been that way forever. It’s really only a problem for one world NWO types.

No, we really can’t. You think racial “privilege” is bad now? Just wait to see how corrupt things get once the US is a defacto extension of Mexico via demographics. You think they are going to be overly burdened with the task of being good little cultural Marxists and making sure everything is fair for everyone? Only sheltered privileged types could possibly come up with these out of touch fantasies.

Because it wont harm you specifically, or anyone else who has the resources to avoid the consequences. You pass these onto others.

But since there isn’t really going to be a “level playing field” any time soon, we will keep affirmative action, and that’s alright by you. Your job isn’t being threatened, and the white guy who is being harmed probably doesn’t vote Democrat. That’s the thinking.

Look up white guilt.

There is nothing wrong with “racial privilege”. I probably would feel out of place if I went into an black barber shop in downtown Compton. They’d probably look at me funny, at the very least. I wouldn’t call that unfair or wrong, I knew it would be like that when I went in there. I’m simply out of my environment and I’m around a group of people I have nothing in common with who have a different culture than I do. A black person would be better adapted to that environment and culture, among his own people. How is this wrong? Or is it only wrong when it happens to minorities in environments that whites created?

Yeah sure you do. You love the West so much you twice voted for “fundamentally transforming” it and are in favor or replacing Westerners with non-Westerners.

Have the people in those countries been surveyed on whether they want their countries to be majority non-white, non-Western in the future? Have we? Or was that decision made without the consent of the people?

Except that’s not going to happen. If Hispanics gain more power they will empower their own people at the expense of others. You’re really just about tearing down whites. You haven’t thought ahead past that.

Why should poor whites have to compete with uneducated impoverished 3rd world economic migrants who wash ashore, here? Poor whites need to have their wages deflated and live in poverty so they could avoid losing their jobs to people who need endless Government handouts and work for next to nothing? Why do you care more about illegal aliens than you do with poor Americans? Is it their brown skin that you find enticing, or is it about how they vote? Either is a likely explanation.

Mexico defines Hispanics very well, since most of our Hispanic population is Mexican. And no, they are not as American as the descendants of Austrian immigrants. We had white immigrants for most of our history because they were able to assimilate into the white Western society we built.

It’s not a deflection. Your stated goals don’t match up with the results of the policies you support. Inconsistency defines progressivism, but once we start from the foundation that your ultimate goal is to replace whites with non-whites in America for political reasons - then and only then do your arguments make sense.

 

I’m in favor of any strategy that reverses the course of the last 50 years. There’s not a single GOP issue that will matter once the majority of the country is non-white.

This “one day blacks and Hispanics will be patriotic Murricans like us and vote Republican” is a boomer talking point not based in reality. You need to start with the foundational position that these groups are never going to not play identity politics. Why would they? They have nothing to gain by doing this. There is strength in numbers and they are going to side with their race over white Western ideas on how the country should be run. At a fundamental level, these minority groups want your stuff, and they want to have more power. Siding with you isn’t going to do that for them. That’s how you get 97% voting trends.

 

The GOP could usher in the most prosperous period ever for blacks and they would STILL vote Democrat if the GOP was perceived as the white persons party. That’s where this voting bloc is coming from. Look at Trumps speech when he announced the lowest unemployment level for blacks ever. Those black caucus members didn’t cheer, did they?

 

if the GOP took specific actions to promote more jobs, better education, better healthcare, more job training, better nutrition, better infrastructure in urban areas, blacks would pay attention and vote accordingly.

but Republicans dont believe investing in the future, especially for black people

 

Or ... I can take the poster's words at face value especially since his historical posts suggest that behaviors, patterns, etc are tied to race. So him trying to paint a "race" as a monolith is the correct assumption. Nice try though (;^).

 

Most white voters vote Republican so your last point isn’t true.

But what is your evidence that blacks would vote Republican if the GOP stopped supporting cops and started taking the side of holy people like Saint Trayvon and Pope Michael Brown? The Democrats already do these things, so why would blacks switch? Do you think the amount of increased blacks and other minorities would counteract the alienation that many white voters would experience with this new left-friendly direction you’d want to take the party in? Or do you not care about those people? Screw them, right? They don’t matter, they shouldn’t have any representation.

 

The Founders didn’t support degeneracy by calling it “freedom” like today’s libertarians. They believed in things like strong moral character, and actually limited immigration to whites with strong moral character. You really think they would have wanted dudes who chopped off their dicks, calling themselves women, being in the country the Founders just fought a war to establish? Clown world.

 

okay, so change the image

 

"degeneracy" is Alt-Right codeword for "race-mixing"

 

We used to have something called community in this country. It’s what would naturally form when you had a collective of people in the same area, with similar languages, backgrounds, races, and a shared purpose. Your ideas work in an environment of no community. Now in the age of rabid individualism you have Akbar across the street who got here last year from Saudi Arabia, Lupe from Mexico next door, and Tyrone living behind you. What choice would you have in that situation except to be a libertarian?

 

Bad logic. HE said being non white is an evolutionary advantage. Why don’t you criticize him for that supremacism, aside from the obvious hypocrisy?

 

Nah they wouldn’t do that Ronstar-of-