White folks involved in crime are not wealthy. You do recall that you get an attorney free of charge as a part of your defense?
white folks who are found guilty are not wealthy iagree, if they were wealthy then they would be innocent but since white folks earn 40% more than black folks on average they are proportionately wealthy and as such will be able to afford a better lawyer which means they will have a lower statistic than blacks in terms of guilt for crimes. im not entitled to any defense lawyer, ihave to pay at least £1,000 for a basic guy.
It isn't the big earners that are creating a disparity in convictions. Black people are simply committing WAY more than the 13% equivalent to their race in America. Let's not pretend otherwise, it's making excuses where none exist.
Yes, nobody said anything about unarmed "felons". Someone did say "recent shootings over the years occur when people are breaking the law and refuse to comply" and I gave a clear example of that, then you cried about moving the goal posts. Those in or near poverty, no matter the race, commit the most crimes. No one argues that. The issue is you blame a race for the unprofessional treatment by the police and black cops disagree with that assessment.
Several of those people were armed. All of those people were resisting, several were drugged up. None of them were just sitting around doing nothing when the cops showed up. Not one. I'm blaming black culture for creating a huge disparity in crime in America. Over 30% of black males are felons and the most dangerous thing to a black man is...another black man. There's the answer.
merely stating that since whites earn 40% more on average and thus will be able to afford a defense then they will likely have less convictions. another reason for low white criminal convictions is because they run the courts. look at tony bliar for example, he should have been charged for war crimes and be locked up in the but his tribe run the Hague. white tribalism is very real lets not pretend it doesnt exist.
My bold. Quite right, along with Bush. There have been attempts at a citizen's arrest but it hasn't worked. I don't think it's white versus black though, he's just smart enough to avoid it. He was a lawyer, after all.
Nope. I already tossed your "victims" into the proper bin; 1. mcdonal had a knife and was a danger to others, but the jury said guilty so we can go 50/50 on that. 2. eric garner, like anyone who understands choking, can't say "I can't breathe" unless you can breathe. no charges were filed, you lose. 3. the jury found the officr who shot scott's actions criminal but not murder. you lose. 4. floyd was yelling about not breathing for over ten minutes before the police laid a finger on him and that idiot died from a meth/fent overdose, and nothing was lost that day. but you lose again. 5. castille was driving around high and smoking weed with a CHILD in the car. his dumb ass tells the cops he has a gun and won't stop reaching for it like a irrational clot, and got shot. nothing was lost. you lose. So there you have it. The victim card being played is another reason people are losing sympathy for criminals. But keep apologizing for them, that's helping America!
None of which discounts the fact that the judges and jury are all white. You fail to acknowledge white tribalism is a real issue in the criminal justice system, never mind society as a whole. You must be quite nervous to see many of your tribe now starting to see what america truly stands for.
You're back to blaming whitey and pretending these criminals were not criminals. I get it, black people are all victims and do nothing wrong, it's the cops. That's too funny. The good news is bad guys will get smoked for doing what they do, and nothing is going to change the attitude of a criminal culture.
So what you are saying is "black culture" is the cause of crime? The 55% of African Americans who are middle class and above and members of that culture, I would wager, consider that a racist statement. Poverty or near poverty anywhere in the world, no matter the race, has an increased incidence of crime. There's your answer.
tony bliar laughs at your naive musings but iagree, whites will never admit the pure evil they have done over the last 500 years. There is no sentence worthy for the horrifying practice of the slave trade.
that doesn’t seem to address why 13% of the US population commits over 60% of violent crime. It’s not poverty, is people making excuses for poor behavior.
whites are pure evil. I’m going to guess you’re waiting on a terminal somewhere to escape to Africa where you can make certain no black people suffer at the hands of the people that kill them the most...I mean whitey. Hilarious.
Perhaps thirteen percent of the nation's population should cease committing fifty percent of the nation's violent crime.
If the judge and jury are all white and white folk earn 40% more than black folk and can therefore afford a top lawyer its hardly surprising that whites are found not guilty most of the time. Even a simpleton can see that even if he cant see that america was the blueprint for the nazis.
I think I did. Do you think the 55% of members of black culture who are middle class and above are out committing crimes? They are no more prone to illegal activity than other members of their class. Logically it's not culture. What could it be? What other variable is totally obvious?
