The phone transcript was made public - NO QUID PRO QUO The Ukrainian president has categorically denied it! So, if the two parties who supposedly participated in it have denied it AND the phone transcripts show no evidence, WHY Is John Bolton's testimony even worthy of being heard? For starters, assume there was a quid pro quo and BOTH Trump and Zelensky are lying (unprovable but assume). SO WHAT? Joe Biden and his son did corrupt things or does a son making 100k a month because of his dad's position and being saved by his dad who abused power of VP to get prosecutor fired, not corrupt? SO WHAT if Trump asked Ukraine to look into this? SO WHAT? This would've NEVER been considered impeachable in the past, it's only now, due to TDS... a serious health crisis in america today. BUT, fact remains that the two parties involved deny it so what is the value of having John Bolton say that Trump said he wanted to freeze aid in exchange for Ukraine looking into Bidens' corrupt like actions? Then it's just Bolton's words vs Trump's and Zelensky's. GOP will remove Trump under this scenario? 99.9% chance that they do not. SO WHAT IS THE POINT? Romney and the other 2-3 senators are just worrying about their seats, that is all. THEY WILL NEVER VOTE YAY to remove Trump over this, they are cowardly just trying to figure out not what is the right thing to do (end this bogus political wet mess now) but what is right for them. Grow some cojones Romney and do the right thing! but hey, i wonder, maybe we do need the Bidens and Bolton to testify. Bolton will turn out to be a disappointment, a man saying X when Trump and Zelensky say Z... with no evidence to prove anything (and a nice juicy book to sell off this drama). Bidens? How will they explain all that corrupt like behavior? Maybe, oh maybe, we do need to hear from witnesses.