The point is you don't have one. Your religious beliefs are not necessarily shared by... the rest of the world. .
Here's another little gem from the book (pp.123-124 ): As far back as 1972, the National Coalition of Gay Organizations adopted a gay rights platform that included a demand to repeal all laws governing the age of sexual consent. It is homosexual activists within the United Nations who are lobbying to give sexual rights to underage children. In England, the campaign is being led by Outrage! and Stonewall, both homosexual organizations. The Dutch homosexual group, Association for the Integration of Homosexuality, has succeeded in lowering the age of legal sex to twelve in Holland. Assisting them was another homosexual group, the COC, which stated: The liberation of pedophilia must be viewed as a gay issue [and that] ages of consent should therefore be abolished by acknowledging the affinity between homosexuality and pedophilia, the COC has quite possible made it easier for homosexual adults to become more sensitive to the erotic desires of younger members of their sex, thereby broadening gay identity. In Canada, the effort is led by homosexual activist and NAMBLA defender Gerald Hannon. In America, aside from NAMBLA, the effort is supported by most of the major homosexual organizations such as the National Gay Task Force. Indeed, the annual homosexual March on Washington invariably releases a statement of demands which includes abolishing age of consent laws. Homosexuals in Hawaii have already successfully lowered the age of consent there to fourteen. To be frank, it is difficult to find an advocate of lowering the age of consent laws in the United States or elsewhere who is not a homosexual activist. (Child Molestation and the Homosexual Movement by S. Baldwin, published in the Regent University Law Review, Vol. 14 (2001- 2002), pp. 277-278
"Homosexualism Exposed"..... Hummmmmm. It being the 21st. Century & all, is there really much to be "exposed" of a sexual nature... Hetro, OR Homo? FFS, so long as there is no move by any side in this, ... This.... "Debate", to enshrine ANY version of Sexuality as, "State Sanctioned", what is the business!? I mean really.
In this corner, in the red trunks with pink trim - Bad Ass Islamophobes. In this corner, in the blue trunks with the white trim, Hothead Homophobes. May the worst bigot win. You can each keep sliming each other with the most filthy despicable stereotypes until one side gives up or the thread is closed.
I'm not a bigot. And not even interested in this issue which doesn't concern us. We are reluctant but forced to respond to the homos who were a laughing stock for us, but now they have suddenly become emboldened and are at the forefront of attacking Islam presently. People who stick their business in the place where another man defecates. I mean really do you think these people have any dignity, but now they have the audacity to start attacking us. It's like a pig criticizing Ms. Universe "She's not that pretty" So I apologize if this is offending anyone. But we were forced to respond because the homos picked a fight with us when they should have minded their own business
So it's islamaphbic to say what Mohammed did? I guess all imams are islamophobic. I didn't stereotype anybody I only attacked the ideology and the "prophet." Was I wrong or is all you can do is parrot out "islamophobic" when someone says something you don't like.
Yeah, that's called a renaissance. Islam desperately needs it. Well islamic ideology is backward and barbaric. If you don't want to be criticized don't come out into public. Don't broadcast your lunacy. No gay people are slaughtered in islamic countries. Thay is barbaric and we need to keep that filth out of our country. If you can behave like civilized people that's fine. But claiming some fairytale is science is laughable. You deserve to be mocked for that it's imperative that we mock that lest people's minds become polluted with it
The Child Molestation Research and Prevention Institute notes that 90% of child molesters target children in their network of family and friends. Most child molesters, therefore, are not gay people lingering outside schools waiting to snatch children from the playground, as much religious-right rhetoric suggests. Homosexuality is no more connected to pedophilia than heterosexuality is.
Red herring. The issue is not whether children are molested by strangers or people they know. That is definitely a red herring. Scratch a homo and you find a pedo. Why did the Catholic priests molest mostly boys and not girls? Scratch a homo and you find a pedo. Would a normal heterosexual man want to be a priest anyways? Research is out there that most of those priests who make vows of celibacy, especially the ones later caught abusing little boys, are homos through and through. But its not even the topic of this thread. The point I'm making which you completely missed, perhaps even deliberately, is that the people out there who are advocating for decriminalization of pedophilia are homosexualist groups. Again, please read the book (link in the OP) with an open mind and heart and discover the reality.
Nobody needs to read that garbage. Islam is against homosexuality because a magical genie says so. Any rationalization to that end is just that.
Libs brought this on themselves, they can't say we didn't warn them. This is just a taste of what they have coming to them from their pet project members.
It doesn't matter if they're born gay. What matters is that if two consenting adults want to enjoy mutually pleasurable activities, that is their business and it is both a breach of justice and a waste of resources to stand in the way. No, NAMBLA does not represent homosexuality in general. NAMBLA is problematic in that their objective inherently involves victimization of non-consenting children. This stands in contrast to homosexuality that involves consenting adults. The lines are pretty clear. Uh yeah, caused by certain strains of HPV just like cervical cancer in women, which used to be a big problem before pap smears. Does that mean that vaginal sex is vagina abuse?
(rare, often pejorative). If youre really seeking serious intellectual debate, maybe you shouldnt be using pejorative terms for people involved, especially people youre having those debates with.
What is there to debate? If 2 hairy men want to stick their cocks up each other's ass go right ahead. Just don't ask for my approval. And no matter how your try to spin it Obama style...2 hairy men can never be husband and wife and a mentally ill man in a dress is not a woman. No debate...just fact.
