"Justice Thomas: SCOTUS should reconsider contraception"

And after that, we're banning crocs and cargo shorts.

 

Tell us what did he say then

 

LOL, is that a good question in your mind? Why would a state do that? In what universe would it make any sense at all to ban contraceptives?

 

I don’t care about Roe, just trying to show you that your strict constructionist view of the Constitution is faulty and thus your arguments against Roe are also

 

LoL.

First public education clearly failed you, and then what should be a natural curiosity about the world around you failed to develop.

Tough hand there.

 

religious fanatics taking over the court.... told you they were gonna go after contraception next.....

some religions hate our free country and want a theocracy pushed on them by the government

 

No one is proposing any such thing.

 

I'm dying laughing.

 

Right.

 

Not a question if they do it, but rather according to the SCOTUS, as created in the precedent they just set, they could do it, along with an array of other activities.

 

One of the reasons I have always supported same-sex marriage is precisely because I'm in a heterosexual interracial marriage and I can see how thinking such as Thomas's could absolutely be coerced to ban the very thing he's been in enjoyment of for so long.

 

the reality is, banning Contraception would mean many many more unwanted children in the world, which costs society much much more

 

Dying is appropriate, your done, when another can’t exchange, can’t even answer questions regarding his words, he’s finished, the only thing he has left to offer is corny emojis

Say goodnight Gracie

 

Oh oh they're heading for the cliff en masse.

 

Have you ever been to a Star Trek convention?

 

Several of us tried explaining things you should have learned in the 7th grade, but you're just not getting it.

That's not our fault.

Also, it's "you're", not "your".

 

Well gee, the congress could do a lot of things. What precedent do you think the SCOTUS is setting by overturning rulings based on substantive due process? Do you know what precedent means?

 

So you think Thomas would actually be in favor of outlawing his own marriage? I'm sure he knows divorce is still an option for him if he's no longer happy being married to a white woman.

 

Again, even if it were technically possible WHY THE F*** WOULD ANY LEGISLATURE PURSUE IT??? Is your view of democracy that low?

 

There was no president for the supreme Court fabricating a right to abortion out of whole cloth.

Even Ruth bader Ginsburg said it was a bad ruling

 

Agreed. Now who is proposing banning contraception? Oh that's right: NO ONE!

 

You won't be wondering for long I'll bet.

 

But the cost doesn't matter until they are actually born. After that it matters a lot.

 

Women aren't "People"?

 

It is now.