Maxine Waters: Congress Can Remove Trump Without Impeachment

no the govt doesn’t own all the land. We have property rights in the united states

sure taxes are something we pay to the govt...with out money...that we earn...it’s not the govts money til we pay it to them

correct people move if they don’t like the taxes that’s part of the problem NY is having...people have moved...

 

I said that because what he said. I know we own the land in a sense but we do have to pay our taxes or that land can be forfeited


Plus there are too many peeps living in the nyc area anyways.

 

lines and such cerainly if we don’t pay property taxes...and that’s part of the problem NY is having...people are fleeing the state because their tax policies

 

Why I find it to be a funny point of contention imo

 

Why I find it to be a funny point of contention imo

 

Funny how those cuts/bailouts are passed out like candy... doesn't seem very capitalistic

 

tax cuts are passed out like candy??? i wish that were true.

i agree bailouts are silly

 

It's not. The federal government shouldn't be picking favorites. But they do, very often now.

 

They are if your in the right class

 

The left is going to to lose their collective minds when he wins reelection.

 

never seen one class only get a tax cut

 

if you think the rioting is bad now..

 

This thread is Fake News

 

She's never been the brightest. The route she is talking about still requires 2/3rds vote, not just in the Senate, but also the House, which is a higher bar than impeachment.

 

Was this $1 trillion GOP offer you speak of the total sum of the package, or was it just an amount for the state/city "relief" /sarcasticquotes section?

 

Weird

 

1 trillion was all Republicans offered they never moved whereas Democrats were at 3.4t and they went down to 2t

 

Both sides do it, don’t kid yourself

 

If you are trying to say the rich, then both Democrats AND Republicans are guilty of helping the rich at the expense of the poor. Always has been.

 

I agree with your statement wholeheartedly

 

Right, so now lets go back to the point. This nearly $1 trillion dollar amount that House Dems want so they can give to states/cities is a part of a large stimulus package containing, among other things, money for the USPS and checks for all of us. Whereas this huge massive amount of money for states is an area of contention that Senate Repubs simply will never approve because 1) the money for the same purpose from the last stimulus package is only ~25% depleted, 2) the total sum is more than twice what even Democrat budget specialists say will be the 2022 tax shortfall (the reason for the money in the first place), and 3) House Dems want to expand beyond reason the qualifications for using the monies.

Aside from this issue the package would pass with minimal adjustments but as you can see Democrats are standing firm on getting a massive chunk of money that will be more than double their own projected shortfalls, when they already have cash that hasn't been spent, and rather than cut back on their own budgets to help the problem they are instead planning to massive expanding them and demand the feds pick up the bill. So its not Repubs holding up money for the USPS, its Dems.

However this is all a game anyways because House Dems don't actually want the money for the USPS. I'll give you a little present from the future here and let you know that very soon you will see Democrat motions in federal courts to have state ballot-harvesting laws rendered illegal nation wide. They don't want the USPS handling mail-in-ballots, they know they will fumble it. Dems want 3rd party (aka unions) to "render assistance during these trying times" (you watch that'll be the language) because they have already seen the massive /coughfradulent benefit of ballot harvesting.

 

Congress cannot remove the President, short of impeachment.
The 25th Amendment is initiated by the Executive branch; Congress cannot do anything with it until the EB hands it off to them.

 

They're just that - allegations, made to further a partisan narrative.

 

If the state decides to temporarily close your business for the good of the whole, the state bears some responsibility to cover your losses for that period of time.

 

Yeah, that's what I thought when I read that... Trust me, if Congress (I.E. The House by itself) could have removed our National Security threat POTUS, they would have done so already.