Planned parenthood leaves title x family programs because of abortion rule

First there is no support for your four million claim PP is jot closing second there are expontionally more clinics and resources other than PP especailly in rural areas. Only 3 in my state all surrounded by other providers HUGELY bigger than the planned parenthood clinics and as I said in Georgia only 5 and all in Atlanta. PP could easily spinoff its baby killing services and keep actual heath services open if it wanted to do so.

 

They, federal and state, are SEPARATE SYSTEMS........just admit you were wrong.

 

Because they may actually believe the nonsense you and other pro-abortionist claim.

 

And you disagree with that, right?

 

That's because I was quoting you! You said "PP is in the US." You didn't say that PP is EXCLUSIVELY in the US. Did you want me to misquote you?

 

Why can't you address the WHOLE post ?


First, admit I never said what YOU claimed I said , "" ""that if I walk up to a woman and stab her with a syringe and inject her with a sedating agent, that I have not violated her right to her body""


Then , read the following slowly:

If ANY patient is hysterical or uncontrollable or screaming or flailing about then they are sedated.

They can't be helped if they are uncontrollable.

MEDICAL personnel determine that. Trained medical doctors.....and that isn't you.

If a woman walks in and quietly and calmly asks for an abortion at 8 1/2 months she probably wouldn't be given a sedative BUT she would be given a psyche evaluation.


EITHER way(now read slowly) she would NOT be given an abortion.

End of discussion, it is all spelled out clearly.

 

LOL! You just proved yourself wrong !!!


"PP is in the US" is a fact.

 

Yeah, you never said that.

And you disagree with that, right?

 

Exclusively?

 

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-abortion-rule.560468/page-29#post-1070918625

 

Yeah, you never said that.

And you disagree with that, right? You think that a SANE woman should be able to have abortion at ANY point if she decides that she wants one, right?

 

"Hitmen kill human beings" doesn't make sense? Seriously? Who do they kill exactly?

 

I would be illegal for the doctor to PERFORM, not for the women to HAVE. It's unbelievable that you STILL haven't understood that!

No, but you're questioning me on why I don't think that women should be prosecuted, so surely you know that I I don't think that women should be prosecuted! If you do understand this, then why are you asking me questions such as: "so what would be the crime in having an abortion or providing one?"

Which is why I went on to make a suggestion! Which you quoted in your reply! (Below.)

Yeah, a new crime. Have you never heard of new legislation?" Or do you only accept new legislation which you agree with?

Well it's the government who would make new legislation and it wouldn't be the case that only SOME doctors are charged! They ALL would be!

 

And if abortion wasn't available and women who don't want a baby decide to just have it anyway, do you suppose if it got too difficult that some SANE women would kill their kid even if it was legal?

 

Yeah, great debating skills requires a response! If you agree with that, then you should have no problem whatsoever responding to my above replies! Good luck!

 

NO, what you said about "hitmen don't kill blobs of cells they kill human beings"" didn't make sense.


Of course you had to pretend you said something else...

 

WHY would abortion be a crime?

You can' t just say, "because I think it should be"

That isn't how laws are made.



It is still unbelievable that you think someone should get away with committing a crime because they're female...

 

I assume that you haven't finished replying to the post that you have started to reply to in your post quoted above. Otherwise I may have to remind you of the many times that you have asked me why I can't reply to ALL of your post! Anyway, you're off to a good start! Keep it going if you can!

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
WHY would abortion be a crime?

You can' t just say, "because I think it should be"

That isn't how laws are made.



It is still unbelievable that you think someone should get away with committing a crime because they're female...

I see you have no answers or rebuttals (as usual) ….and you keep going with no answers ………..

Gee, it's so telling …

 

"No answers or rebuttals?" Yeah, I think that you missed posts #761 to #764! WHO is the one who has no answers or rebuttals?

 

My post came first and you never answered the question nor refuted anything

:FoxHastings said: ↑
WHY would abortion be a crime?

You can' t just say, "because I think it should be"

That isn't how laws are made.



It is still unbelievable that you think someone should get away with committing a crime because they're female..."""


WHY would abortion be a crime?

IF abortion isn't a crime then why do you want to charge doctors who perform one??? That doesn't make sense.

 

You put that in quotation marks, but where did I say "because I think it should be?"

When did I say that abortion shouldn't be a crime?

 

I did NOT say you said it. I said:
FoxHastings said: ↑
WHY would abortion be a crime?

You can' t just say, "because I think it should be"

I did NOT say you said that. I said : ""IF abortion isn't a crime then why do you want to charge doctors who perform one??? That doesn't make sense.""


It all goes back to the question you don't answer : WHY would abortion be a crime?


IF it's because it's deemed murder then both participants are charged.

IF it is not murder then what is it?




You can dance around it all you want but you have never answered that pertinent question. WHY would abortion be a crime?

 

WHO can't just say that?

Because it would be killing a life.

 

Then it would be murder.

If a person hires another person to commit a murder, and they do, they are BOTH charged with murder.


That is the law.


I don't think that a person should be allowed to hire a murderer and go free because they are female.

I don't think anyone who hires a murderer should go free.


And the law agrees with me.


The Anti-Choicers want to make themselves appear caring by letting those who hire murderers go free but that is against the law.



Now, before you ask another irrelevant, nit picky, meaningless question try to refute what I just posted.