SCOTUS Flips Trump the Bird

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Bob0627, Dec 8, 2020.

  1. Bow To The Robots

    Bow To The Robots Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25,855
    Likes Received:
    5,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ad hominem fallacy. I am not the topic of this thread.

    FFS do I really have to explain why every American has a stake in every vote cast in every state?

    If course it is. The USSC holds the special distinction as the final arbiter of all matters with regard to the Constitution and the law. It is the last check in the system checks and balances and thus adjudicates on behalf of the people.
     
  2. Bow To The Robots

    Bow To The Robots Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25,855
    Likes Received:
    5,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry, summary dismissal =/= "hearing it."
     
  3. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    16,925
    Likes Received:
    13,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    You should pay attention to facts. Talking point memos rarely contain facts.
     
  4. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    16,925
    Likes Received:
    13,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Right. In order for them to have heard it, they had to believe it had something resembling merit. LOL.
     
  5. CenterField

    CenterField Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2020
    Messages:
    9,738
    Likes Received:
    8,378
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    They did hear it. They heard it and summarily dismissed it.
     
  6. Bow To The Robots

    Bow To The Robots Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25,855
    Likes Received:
    5,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Strawman. You don't get to move the goalposts. The topic of this thread is one specific court. You should know this, yunno since it's your thread and all...

    See above. Then remember again this alleged "steal" you speak of is also not the topic of this thread. Please try to stay on topic.

    C. None of the above.
     
  7. Bow To The Robots

    Bow To The Robots Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25,855
    Likes Received:
    5,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thank you for acknowledging the court did not hear this case.
     
  8. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Did the air go out of your balloon now?
     
  9. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    16,925
    Likes Received:
    13,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    What's your point? SCOTUS not hearing the case is even worse. It means that the case is so lacking in any merit whatsoever, they already know the answer.

    That's not actually a point of pride for Team Trump. LOL.
     
  10. Bow To The Robots

    Bow To The Robots Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25,855
    Likes Received:
    5,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ad hominem fallacy. I am not the topic of this thread.

    That said, Biden's mental state as demonstrated when he speaks is a hair better than Reagan's at the end of his term. Thing is, Biden isn't even at the beginning of his term. Errr, Harris' term...
     
  11. Bow To The Robots

    Bow To The Robots Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25,855
    Likes Received:
    5,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam. The Court dismissing the case in summary is proof of nothing.
     
  12. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The lawsuit was dismissed by 2 courts before it got to SCOTUS, you should know this but maybe you don't.

    The entire premise for Trump's circus act is that the election was stolen, a massive fraud, please try to stay on topic.

    That wasn't one of the choices.
     
  13. Bow To The Robots

    Bow To The Robots Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25,855
    Likes Received:
    5,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But this topic is? The SUPREME COURT. Legal actions typically start in lower courts so your pallid defense is moot.

    Ad hominem fallacy. You should know that I am not the topic of this thread.

    You offered unproven allegations in a rebuttal. If you want to discuss this "steal," you should start a thread on it.



    I can see your false dichotomy.
     
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2020
  14. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    16,925
    Likes Received:
    13,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Actually, it's 100% proof that they didn't want to hear this case.

    Anyone who believed a CONSERVATIVE SC was going to get involved in a state's rights issue, was delusional. Be careful what you wish for.
     
  15. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    16,925
    Likes Received:
    13,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    How you can listen to Trump day after day and believe that Biden is the one with issues, is beyond me. Cult mentality is what it is, though.
     
    ChiCowboy likes this.
  16. squidward

    squidward Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    37,112
    Likes Received:
    9,515
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Retract your incorrect OP yet?
     
  17. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I haven't defended anything worth defending. I merely gave you 2 choices.

    Neither am I. Hypocrite much?

    This is about a steal. Either there's massive election fraud perpetrated by nearly everyone who is not Trump and his sycophants, or there's massive election fraud being perpetrated by Trump and his tools. So I asked you to pick one.

    I can see your false choice selection.
     
  18. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    8,576
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because the air went out of your balloon?
     
  19. Bow To The Robots

    Bow To The Robots Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25,855
    Likes Received:
    5,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your pedantics are showing. Proof of nothing rationally-related to the topic.

    Clever, but not a states' rights issue: When a state violates its own laws -- as the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania did -- the rights of the people are infringed by said state, and the remedy is adjudication in the federal courts. There is a clause tacked onto the end of the 10th Amendment: "nor prohibited by it," meaning delegated powers to the United States include jurisprudence. States do not have a right to invaldiate the votes of the people by fudging their own rules governing elections. Hence, the various legal actions on behalf of the people in the federal court system up to and including the USSC.
     
    squidward likes this.
  20. ChiCowboy

    ChiCowboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    23,076
    Likes Received:
    14,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Says the guy who cites every logical fallacy known to man.


    Which court ruled that PA violated its own laws?
     
    Bob0627 and Curious Always like this.
  21. Surfer Joe

    Surfer Joe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Messages:
    24,400
    Likes Received:
    15,544
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How’s it feel beating a dead horse?
     
  22. Curious Always

    Curious Always Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    16,925
    Likes Received:
    13,463
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    1. When the SCOTUS says they won't hear a case, it literally means they don't want to hear the case. What makes you think otherwise?
    2. The SC of PA said the state violated no laws. They are the final arbiter of these things in PA. SCOTUS will not comment on it. They proved this yesterday, by saying they won't hear the case.

    Each state's Supreme Court has the final say on that state's internal issues. SCOTUS doesn't get involved in state's rights. The very best chance you have of that is with a liberal court, but even that is iffy.

    You all wanted a very conservative court. You have one. Now you get to see what that means. Psst: It doesn't mean republican court and it doesn't mean loyal to Trump, court.
     
    ChiCowboy likes this.
  23. Spooky

    Spooky Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2013
    Messages:
    31,814
    Likes Received:
    13,377
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Over 90 mysterious deaths with people involved closely with the Clintons.

    If you think that's a coincidence then there is no help for you.
     
  24. Bow To The Robots

    Bow To The Robots Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25,855
    Likes Received:
    5,926
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ad hominem fallacy. I am not the topic of this thread.


    None. And that is the issue. Because the evidence is there, prima facie.
     
  25. ChiCowboy

    ChiCowboy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2015
    Messages:
    23,076
    Likes Received:
    14,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're your own straight man. Lol.



    Yes, that is the issue. Yet you claimed it as fact. What's that logical fallacy called?
    Medium rare. Extra horseradish.
     
    Curious Always likes this.

Share This Page