Yeah, I'm fairly pleased with Trump. I'm just sick of the left wing, state run, mainstream media, propaganda campaign against him. And I'm wondering how many of those citizens who are against Trump, really just want the negative coverage to stop or have simply been brainwashed.
Wow! I'm convinced.. President Hillary is going to make you Secretary of WhoCares because you're so dang smart.
It's not just happening in blue California "Kansas Lawmakers Defect to Democrats as G.O.P. Struggles in Suburbs" https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/22/us/kansas-republicans-turn-democrat.html
And here I thought you would feel bad Pelosi kicked his butt. I'm glad you have seen the light, amigo.
When do you suppose Romney will criticize Trump again? All the hearings coming up will force Cruz/ Rubio/ Graham to join Kasich's team.
Hahaha. Pelosi made a hack partisan cheap shot. Reminds me of Harry Ried's nuclear option. How's that working out?
I've said that myself, several times. But he was NOT the choice of the majority of the American people, as many right wingers actually suggest (Indeed some suggest that he had a SUPER majority, and thus has a mandate) About 3 million more Americans did NOT want Trump to be President than those that did, that much is undeniable fact. The Constitution is a great Document but it cannot alter reality
Pelosi is now in Steny Hoyer's sights. "Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) may be stubbornly refusing to come to the bargaining table on immigration — or in any capacity — but she appears to be slowly losing the faith of her Democratic colleagues. Rep. Steny Hoyer, (D-MD), the second most powerful Democrat in the House next to Pelosi, told Fox News on Tuesday that he believes "physical barriers are part of the solution" to handling illegal immigration, upending previous statements by House Democrats that a border wall itself is "immoral" and counterproductive." DAILY WIRE, Are Democrats Set To Undermine Pelosi? Steny Hoyer, Centrist Dems Tell Speaker To 'Build The Wall', By EMILY ZANOTTI, January 23, 2019. https://www.dailywire.com/news/42570/are-democrats-set-undermine-pelosi-steny-hoyer-emily-zanotti
Newsflash... Trump didn't win the "Imaginary Popular Vote Election" because he was too busy running for President. Trump could have easily campaigned in Calif and NY and picked up millions of votes. Face it. Hillary doubled Trump's spending, had the MSM in her pocket, and still had her ass kicked onto her shoulders. Whining about the rules after you lose changes nothing.
You are confused. Trump didn't need phantom voters. He won. Remember? Fair and Square. According to the Constitution. Against the MSM and big money donations. Period. End of Story. Perhaps you're confused because you are dreaming of a Phantom Popular Vote Election, which Trump never entered and never-ever-ever tried to win.
Statements like this shouldn't increase the support among the more 'moderate Democrats, and certainly not with the Middle. https://www.hannity.com/media-room/...nt-could-be-closed-forever-over-budget-fight/
Judicial Watch uncovered some surprising stats explaining , perhaps, why Hillary did so well there. https://www.investors.com/politics/...n-live-adults-a-red-flag-for-electoral-fraud/
Yes, It was clear from the start the Pelosi was willing to keep the government shutdown as long as she thought it was politically useful for her and the DP.
DP election rigging has become routine. "U.S. Has 3.5 Million More Registered Voters Than Live Adults — A Red Flag For Electoral Fraud"
Not all Americans are as crazy as her committed supporters and once the rationals become more familiar with her anti American tactics she'll lose a great deal of support.
That rather flies in the face of their 'nothing to see here' claims and helps explain their war against the use of any Voter ID cards.
Even the Bezos TDSrs are rejecting Pelosi. "Mr. Trump’s offer should be welcomed but not accepted as the final word. There should be room to talk about the amount of money; how border security will be defined and enhanced; which categories of dreamers and TPS beneficiaries are covered; what their legal status will be, and for how long. But to refuse even to talk until the government reopens does no favors to sidelined federal workers and contractors. Unquestionably a deal would contain galling elements for both sides; that’s the nature of compromise. But a measure of statesmanship for a member of Congress now is the ability to accept some disappointments, and shrug off the inevitable attacks from purists, if it means rescuing the lives of thousands of deserving people living among us." THE WASHINGTON POST, Make a deal. Save the dreamers., The Post's View Opinion,1/19/19. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...9f77a3bcb6c_story.html?utm_term=.07c09ac7531e
