Federal Judge In Sentencing General Flynn Drops Bombshell On FBI!

NOt a miranda situation. NO custody, No charge, No arrest.

And if you think Flynn needed to be educated on the perils of lying to the FBI, I think that is a rather telling statement about what "all the best people" mean.

 

I see what you are saying. Its the prosecution that are the criminals and all these investigations are an abuse of power by trump's own justice department.



Shut down the Justice Department. They are all criminals criminally trying to make trump and his cronies criminals by investigating and indicting them and then trying them and then sentencing them. Its a giant criminal conspiracy and Trump the Just is the target!

Go get em.

 

So? I guess criminals never lie and FBI agents are infallible lie detectors. Never believed a lie to your face before? Of course you have, you support trump.

 

And you, with your 2500 dollars burning a hole in your pocket.. Trump simply replaced two criminal franchises, be it the Obama Cabal or the Clinton Cartel.

 

Come Tuesday, we will see if Judge Sullivan is honest or just another part of the problem.

 

No miranda required.

And trump was warned about Flynn being a problematic pick by numerous people, including Yates and Obama.

Remind us all again, why was Flynn fired by Trump?

 

The "unmasking" has nothing to do with Flynn being caught up in the US spying on Russians. There was no FISA warrant to listen to Flynn. The warrant was to listen to Russians. If Flynn got mixed up...that was on him.

No one went after Flynn...Flynn was a willing participant on all counts.

It is not for a judge to claim Flynn's Miranda rights. That has to be done by Flynn.

 

You say that no one went after Flynn while the original 302 write up has not been submitted to the judge.

You are only correct in saying that they were not after Flynn. They were trying to illegally take down Trump.

 

the only GOP crying on Brennan Comey and Clapper were the losers that lost the HRC investigations like...Nunes and Chaffetz

 

hahahahahaha! false equivalency rules!

 

Yeah, but lying is. A crime to which Flynn CONFESSED. If you think Flynn forgot what he discussed just weeks earlier with Kislyak then I've got a bridge in the Mohave Desert to sell you.

 

any beachfront available?

 

The unmasking protocols were in no way followed in Flynn's case. The mere conversation between a citizen and the Russian ambassador (or any other foreigner) in no way shows any need for unmasking. Do you have any idea how many citizens talk with the ambassador?? probably in the thousands. And there is nothing more common and expected than a National Security Advisor talking with the ambassador. Flynn was unmasked (and leaked -- a crime) for the FBI for only one evident reason -- to set him up. And try to set him up they did. Unfortunately the FBI people who interviewed Flynn, Strzok and McCabe IIRC, found nothing wrong, no lying in their opinion. But it was close enough for the girls Mueller goes with -- his witch hunt needed it.

 

You got yourself all tied up in knots. If a citizen talks with a foreigner who is being surveiled under a FISA warrant, it is not on him, for heavens sake. It is a heavy onus on the surveillers to take great care that the citizen is not exposed.
Since when was Flynn a willing participants? ANS: since after he was hammered and threatened.
So, you think that a person being arrested doesn't get his Miranda rights unless he asks for them?????? You get one more think.

 

That is the fake, feeble pretense being touted by Flynn's nutboy spawn and the ideological media's parrots.

It is laughable.

It is highly likely that Flynn, with his extensive experience in matters of government protocol, would have encountered the concept of telling the truth when under oath without needing an attorney to inform him of it.

Flynn has confessed that he had lied to FBI investigators about his contacts with Russian officials in that meeting.

"They tricked me, Lyin' Don! They never
said I should tell the truth under oath!"​

 

Where did you get the idea that Flynn was under oath during his conversation with the FBI??? HINT: look behind you...... lower.....

 

Bull twaddle ... on many accounts. You don't need "legal expertise" to know that Clapper was not charged. You do not need legal expertise to know that lying to congress is a felony.

You are engaging a fallacious appeal to authority and disingenuous ignorance. This is typical of the denial response of some religious right zealot when they come across information that conflicts with religious belief ... "Avoid the bad thought by all means possible - including irrational gibberish and demonization of the messenger.

In your case it is not religion but your partisan political and necessary illusion bubble.

 

Did he lie or did he just not remember accurately?

 

All the information he had was that this was just a conversation not an interview. And what did he supposedly lie about?

 

That the best you can do. These are gestapo tactics.

Any one of these should have raised alarm bells before doing any prosecuting.

1. Told he could appear without a lawyer.

2. The interviewing FBI agents said they did not think he was lying.

3. Coming up with records for the interview six months later with no original records for the interview.

The sole purpose of prosecuting Flynn was to get Trump. It made no difference that they ruined someone else in the process. This should be alarming to everyone in the US. .I don't know what else you can call it except prosecutor abuse of power.

 

The interviewing FBI agents did not think he was lying.

 

And he had his fingers crossed behind his back when he lied to the FBI?

Wow. What a wily rascal.

 

According to Flynn, they threatened him with more jail time if he did not confess and they threatened his family. Since we do not know what was said by Flynn in the recorded conversation or what was said in the FBI interview, we don't know that he forgot or anything else. Apparently they found some kind of difference in stories. Whether he forgot or it was an omission. It still comes down to the FBI agents who did not think he lied.

 

his contacts with russians and the subject of those discussions. What was he fired for again?